Quote:
Originally posted by SykkBoy2
ok, so let's say the age of consent is changed to 16 tomorrow...does that make it less sick? Are you going to be one of the thousands of webmasters who'd flocked to register domains like barely16.com and create sites proclaiming "she just turned 16 yeaterday and is posing naked for us today" So are you speaking from a position of morality or legality?
The reason we don't have any naked 16 or 17 year olds on our sites is purely due to legality...
even though "non-nude" sites may not necessarily be illegal, I don't really want to have to explain that to the stormtroopers who'd be at my door....
again, legality, not morality...which side is yours?
|
exactly. i'd say almost every straight male here has checked out some girl in a public place sometime.. do you know how old she is when you check her out? no. would it surprise you half of them are "underage"? instantly it's "sick" because the law says 18, and no one wants to admit to that.
the existing child pornography laws are quite short and don't deal with this kind of stuff explicitly. it's a lot of vagueness and is subject to one's personal opinion.
i.e. what exactly is ''sexually explicit conduct'' to you?