It's kind of interesting.
I can see both side of the story and each has their own validity.
But ask yourselves this: Who is she to you ?
Once you figure that out. Then each has their rightful position.
But the fact still remains.. There's a person in the industry who's pretty close to death.
So obviously it's going to effect different people in different ways on many different levels.
So how is Sleazy wrong for voicing his opinion on a tragic accident that could easily be labeled as negligence(not saying that it is..just going of apparent info).
Then again, would we defend and donate if the scenario involved her in a speeding car hitting something resulting in the same position without insurance ?
