Originally Posted by AntiDia

Cease and Desists are nothing, until they sue you over them... they do that, you know... SG folks are trigger-happy. I was giving a Caveat Emptor myself because I felt bad for the OG poster of this thread, having seen a lot of crap firsthand.

I agree that no one should pose for SG, but they are pretty good at snockering in young girls who think it's not porn. You ever see them argue about if they are even shooting for a porn site or not? I have. It's weird. They used to advertise in Portland newspapers as an "Artistic Modelling Site," back in 2001... it's creepy. So many of their wannabe models are like 15, 16, and don't get it because it's presented so differently. Yeah, it sucks! I agree completely.

Did the two people in this thread who fell for SG's affiliates shit feel a little duped? That's probably a better word to have used than exploited... I'm curious... if they knew what they were getting into, they would not have put up with SG's song and dance, right?