View Single Post
Old 01-17-2006, 07:56 AM  
TMM_John
Confirmed User
 
TMM_John's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 6,658
Quote:
Originally Posted by MikeSmoke
I have no idea what MPA was doing or saying in Vegas this year, but some of this rings a familiar bell.
A year ago when I was considering both products, John et. al were very upfront and helpful; Oystein talked trash about NATS and claimed things about it that just weren't true.
After that, when I was looking for a DRM solution, I looked at Playa DRM and saw who was involved with it and decided I didn't want to go there. Glad I made that decision.
Now I've been looking at members' area software. I like CARMA and probably am going with it, but I never even took a look at one other company's product.
Professionalism DOES go a long way. But there's a difference between aggressive marketing and shots at the competition on a board well-established for trash talking --- and honesty in actual one-on-one dealings.
I laugh at the first.
I make decisions based on the second.
Thank you very much Mike. I'm sorry I almost missed this. This is the exact kind of thing I speak of. When someone calls me about NATS and asks about MPA I give them my honest take on it. That it's a good product, a more simple product (which means it's a bit easier to learn for some things), but less flexible and configurable than NATS. I get way too many phone calls telling me things people from MPA have said about us that are totally off base and that really eats away at me. My exact point, and I'm glad you brought it up clearly. Sorry I missed it before.
TMM_John is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote