|
Nila Sagedevan, Commercial pilot and aeronautical engineer.
Greg Szymanski's radio show, The Investigative Journal, on the Republic
Broadcast Network
"The government wants us to believe that a person who couldn't even solo a small Cessna took over the
controls of a Boeing 757 jetliner and performed complicated maneuvers even myself or other experienced pilots
could have never performed.hahaha8221; "It's just not going to happen and, from my point of view, is impossible. If this was
fabricated by the government so was the rest of the 9/11 story."
"You mean to tell me, the supposed inexperienced 5'8" Arab terrorist overpowered the pilot, who weighed more
than 185 lbs and trained in the military. And then after that overpowered the co-pilot in the same manner, a person
who also weighed upwards of 185 lbs," "I am not sure if anyone has been in the cockpit of one of one of these big
jets, but I will tell you there isn't much space. How in the world would one man pull out two big pilots in cramped
quarters while, at the same time, maintaining control of the airline? Again, it's just not going to happen.hahaha8221;
"In the beginning right after 9/11, like most people, I believed most of what I heard about 9/11, not really giving
much thought to a government conspiracy. However, about a year ago when I began gathering information related
to my expertise as an aeronautical engineer and pilot, I began to see clearly how the government story regarding
the four flights, their paths and their pilots didn't make sense.hahaha8221;
"Now I am firmly convinced after looking at an enormous amount of evidence, as well as using well-establishing
aviation principles, that something else crashed into the Pentagon since it couldn't have been a commercial
jetliner."
"First of all, the supposed pilot would have been overwhelmed just looking at the complexity of the cockpit controls,
he would have had no idea what to do, but we are led to believe that he was able to turn the jet around, head back
to Washington D.C. and then bank at high speeds and at a low altitude, hitting a target which would have looked as
small as thimble from the air. Again, it's impossible and you don't really need an expert to make this final
determination."
"The evidence indicates that the airplane was flying low before it reached the Pentagon lawn since several light
poles were sheared off several hundred yards away form the building. With that in mind, the plane was traveling at
about 400 knots at about 20 feet off the ground for a long distance prior to hitting the Pentagon. hahaha8220;
"This in itself is an impossibility since the airplane would have been kept from hitting the ground by a cushion of
air termed 'ground effect.' No pilot in the world would have been able to control the plane while maintained that air
speed at 20 feet off the ground for that long a distance. Again, it's just impossible but here I will admit that an expert
is needed in order to explain the standards of lift and drag associated with flying a large airliner. hahaha8220;
"I really don't understand how anyone could give the government's story any credibility after seeing the original
pictures taken of the small hole left in the Pentagon wall by whatever flew into it. I am not totally sure what the
military used but one thing for sure, it wasn't a 757 jetliner."
"I think if someone just looks at the hole left and then looks at the size of 757, experts aren't needed to determine it
was an impossibility that a big jet hit the Pentagon wall, especially when there was very little wreckage visible after
the crash."
|