View Single Post
Old 03-04-2006, 01:44 PM  
SmokeyTheBear
►SouthOfHeaven
 
SmokeyTheBear's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: PlanetEarth MyBoardRank: GerbilMaster My-Penis-Size: extralarge MyWeapon: Computer
Posts: 28,609
Quote:
Originally Posted by GatorB
Anyone stupid enough to think Alba would be nude inside deserves to lose their $8.
.
?? im not catching you.. many celebs have been on the cover AND nude inside so i dont quite see the corelation ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by GatorB
They got the pics from SONY obviously SONY gave them permission to use it. She has no say in it. I'm sure her contract from SONY says they can use her publicity phots any way they wish. Perhaps she should sue SONY. And perhaps learn to READ her contract before signing it.

.
I dont know that , i was asking for clarification , we "KNOW" sony gave them the pictures, i DONT know that permission was granted to put them on the cover of a magazine.. If sony just hands out pictures for companies to use on magazine covers , then why do magazine pay huge bucks to get celebes on their covers.. and where is the royalty free collection of pictures located so i can use them.. ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by GatorB
Also are you camparing "Hitler's Friends" to Playboy? Hell Playboy is barley softcore in my book let alone hardcore. It's not like she was on HUSTLER
I'm not comparing anything to anything. and im not sure why it would be "ok" to put her pic on playboy and not on hustler ? that was sort of my point.. the content inside the magazine obviously has an effect on the image of the person on the cover..

Since you feel uncomfortable answering the original question, ill pose a tamer one.. If "homosexuals monthly" put your picture on the front and didnt pay you anything , would you be a bit pissed ? and want compensation ?
__________________
hatisblack at yahoo.com
SmokeyTheBear is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote