Quote:
Originally posted by EscortBiz
all BS aside its good news that things are getting better legally
|
While I kinda disagree with this particular law, this is true, it does seem that from a legal perspective that prosecutors are starting to lay off pornographers. But I still think consent is needed in this voyeurism case.
Especially since this article references little girls? Upskirts of girls without consent is bad, but upskirts of little girls (18 or under) and without consent, I kinda draw the line there.
WG