WebLegal,
I have to agree with others here, EVERYTIME I have bought content I have been provided with a scanned copy of some form of age ID for the model(s) concerned.
This ID is usually a passport or driving licence with all the personal details (name, address, etc) blacked out, exactly as you posted here on GFY on the last page.
Why does web-legal have to be different to the majority of other content producers I have dealt with. Why can't you provide ID on request, or better still during purchase, with all the personal details blacked out.
If you still consider providing ID ,with personal details blacked out, an invasion of the models privacy, then why did you post the afforementioned ID on GFY? Where several thousand webmasters and alike, who have not purchased the product can view it?
Whether the ID provided, with personal details blacked out, is enough to satisfy the authorities is a completely different matter, but what it DOES do is satisfy me, the webmaster, your customer.
You should have provided your CUSTOMER Newgrade with a photo ID , (with the personal details blacked out), with the ease that you posted it on GFY for thousands of non-customer webmasters to view.
Had this happened I have absolutely no doubt that Newgrade would had been satisfied of the proof of age, and you could have slept easy at night knowing that you had not provided a potential STALKER with a models personal info.
And hence this post would never have taken place, remember whoever wins this argument, mud still sticks.
My
