Bah....Now I'm wading in with my
Firstly, Having followed this thread from the beginning, I first want to say that it should be REQUIRED reading for anyone new to the adult industry.
Secondly, and this is more opinion that law, but I'm pretty sure that A S H C R O F T et al (meaning the entire criminal justice system) are going to apply a much more lenient interpretation of the whole gray area of the PRODUCER argument.
If the images ARE underage (which is still up for debate in this matter), being associated with ANY part of the process of profiting from Child Pornography is going to do serious harm to the reputation of WebLegal, as legitimate and as trusted as that organization seems to be. No matter what the law says, or what your photographer says, the general consensus among the public (and this is one of those issues that transcends the rule of law) is that child pornographers are a plague - and most people are going to steer clear of ANYONE who has even the slighest stigma of CP. I think the burden of proof is strong enough in this matter that those image galleries for sale should be REMOVED until this is resolved.
Thirdly, this is hardly the appropriate "forum" to discuss this matter. I'm fairly certain that GFY is going to be shut down one day as soon as somebody decides to yell "LIBEL" and sue the whole User list. WebLegal, I'm sure you had better things to do today then defend your reputation all day long. What a shitty waste of time, but I wish you good luck.
Again, only my
, ignore if your veins start popping.