View Single Post
Old 03-24-2006, 02:54 PM  
SilentKnight
Megan Fox's fluffer
 
SilentKnight's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: shooting pool in Elysium
Posts: 24,818
Quote:
Originally Posted by CDSmith
While I agree with most of those rules and fully agree that it's the right of the CCBill owners to decide what they will and won't process for, I do have a problem with the inclusion of "depictions of pain or violence"..... I mean really now, why is it called "acting" and is acceptable when depicted in movies and on TV, but is magically a huge no-no simply because it's on the web?

Something is wrong with such double standards.

There are plenty of fetish models, producers and actors who would take severe exception to those specific rules.
Exactly...its nothing but a double standard.

Sure, its their own company and they're free to dictate policy however they want...but that doesn't stop us from questioning their censorship practices.

If they cease doing processing for sites that link to sites that contain their banned elements - where does it all end? Hell, I'm willing to wager almost any site that contains links these days will eventually wind up leading to a porn site of one kind or another far downstream.

And while I realize they're also subject to the censorship whims of Visa...there's stuff on that list that isn't outlawed by Visa.
SilentKnight is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote