View Single Post
Old 03-24-2006, 06:06 PM  
SilentKnight
Megan Fox's fluffer
 
SilentKnight's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: shooting pool in Elysium
Posts: 24,818
Quote:
Originally Posted by corvette
Our AUP is not there just to protect CCBill against Visa issues, it is also there to protect CCBill legally and financially, and we process for other credit cards other than Visa and we have to comply with ALL association rules, not just Visa.

In and of itself, CCBill does not make more money by rejecting sites. First and foremost, we are in business for the long haul and will not engage in practices that put CCBill at risk.

SilentKnight, I happen to know a lot about how our Policy Review Department works and the reasoning behind all of our policies, I can answer any and all questions you have about our policies, no problemhahaha8230;if you really want to know, icq me 45471840

And if I donhahaha8217;t talk to you, have a good weekend
I'm seldom on icq - but if you'd be so kind as to provide answers here in the forum, I'd be appreciative...I'm sure a few others would be interested in hearing them as well.

My questions are rather basic and straightforward - why does CCBill outlaw processing for sites that contain material protected under the 5th Amendment and Charter of Rights - content that can easily be viewed in a large number of mainstream Hollywood movies these days (i.e. - extreme pain or violence, consumption of blood).

And why is the onus placed on webmasters to police the content of links twice removed, and how does a webmaster ascertain the content of a paysite link without paying to access the member's area?

For example - as it stands now, if I have a link to a site that unknowingly contains something in their member's area that contravenes CCBill's acceptable content, I'm still at risk of losing MY processing. Therefore, I'm left with the choice of either losing the potential affiliate revenue...or risk the possibility of CCBill pulling the plug on MY sites.

We're currently processing with Verotel, but have considered using CCBill in the past on some of our sites. But since we handle primarily bondage & fetish production (all content legal in both U.S. and Canada) and the majority of our links deal with the same subject matter - CCBill's policies give me cause for concern.
SilentKnight is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote