Quote:
Originally Posted by corvette
We have spent a lot of time, effort and resources creating polices that we feel make us safe on a variety of fronts; legal, financial exposure, various contracts/covenants, etc...as well, it is not a secret that we are conservative in order to maintain the excellent and long-lasting relationships that we have with our upstreams
Then we have also spent a lot of time, effort and resources creating various systems, processes and procedures designed to efficiently and effectively bring the riskiest accounts to the attention of the Policy Review staff asap
It took a team of people 1 year on just the design and architecture of the Policy Review system, as well as an enormous amount of my time
Then we spend a lot of time, effort and resources constantly reviewing new accounts as well as our existing accounts.
I am going to let our record speak for itself
We feel all of our decisions come from a very reasonable standpoint, and if you do not agree, we can discuss your account on a one-off basis
|
So, in summary...you and the company spent an enormous amount of time on essentially - becoming subjectively conservative.
Fine.
But that doesn't answer my earlier question:
Why is the onus placed on webmasters to police the content of links twice removed, and how does a webmaster ascertain the content of a paysite link without paying to access the member's area?