|
PornoDoggy
I told him not to post them, he had already bought them. I do not know why he bought them. Maybe he thought he could get the documents.
Unseen
And all those debating the 2257 law.
This is about a girl who looked very young and the documents either being refused to be shown to the buyer. Or/and those documents at best being altered at worse being forged. Not about whether the Webmaster should have these documents.
Having the documents or not, will not stop the police knocking on your door and asking for them.
Two ways this scene can play out.
One system has the Webmaster going to his filing cabinet and producing the documents, the police are now happier than they were. They may look further, but they have seen the Webmaster is legit, so far.
The other system has the Webmaster making frantic phone calls to different suppliers and praying/hoping the documents exist and are real. The police are not happy and more convinced the Webmaster has something to hide.
Webmasters, your call. Go with the system you feel more comfortable with.
THE MODELS RIGHT OF PRIVACY
I will not disclose her address to anyone. The magazines we work for do not get it as they have been known to send around a rival photographer. I will not disclose it to a Webmaster I do not know. We do our best to stop people knocking on her door. we do not sell to Czech magazines or websites.
But there it ends, she gave up some of her "privacy" rights when she took her clothes off in front of my cameras for money. Then signed a model release allowing me to sell those pictures and not prosecute who I sell them to.
The idea of a Ukrainian girl coming to the States to sue a Content Provider is slim. The chances of the police checking to see if a girl is of a certain age are far more likely.
GUARD AGAINST THE MOST LIKELY, NOT THE LEAST LIKELY
|