Quote:
|
Originally Posted by MikeSmoke
of course there should. but our allegedly free-enterprise system won't allow it, it doesn't fit the politically-correct agenda.
and BTW, all of the "second hand smoke" people should do their research, a number of reputable studies (including one by the World Health Organization) have concluded that the second hand smoke "health danger" is a red herring. but the establishment has gotten together to cover up those studies and prevent the wide-spread release of the findings, again for political reasons.
there's no doubt many people don't *like* second hand smoke, and that a *few" are allergic to it. that's why there should be smoking and non-smoking establishments allowed. everyone (INCLUDING smokers) should have the freedom to be in places where they're comfortable and can enjoy themselves.
smoking is bad for you and not a smart thing to do.
but sorry to burst your bubble, second hand smoke isn't killing you by proxy.
|
Why, anything you say captain impartiality! Yes, because of your post I now know that when my eyes sting because theres that much second hand smoke in the air while I'm watch a band at the pub that really it's like breathing antibiotics and antioxidants! yay.. thanks now i'll never worry again because it's not burning my eyes and magically leaving my lungs pinky clean - It's actually the sting of the smoke healing my cataracts!
I'll forward your post to the non smoker bar workers with lungcancer to tell them their illness is a red herring and they aren't dying by proxy..
