Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Phoenix
hahahaha you dont believe your calculations do you?
keep it to short sarcastic responses...much better
|
Why.. what did I screw up? Seriously.. If I made a mistake tell me.. the probabilities are cumulative, so they take into account all of the potential impacts.. and there's nothing confusing about the diameter calculation. 1.8 x 10 ^ -3 is equal to 0.0018 right? which is 0.18 %? or 18/10000.
oh actually I just found one that is 5.4 x 10 ^ -3.. or 54/10000.. but that one's a little smaller, only 7 metres across, so...
Im lookin at this chart:
http://neo.jpl.nasa.gov/risk/