Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Dollarmansteve
Why.. what did I screw up? Seriously.. If I made a mistake tell me.. the probabilities are cumulative, so they take into account all of the potential impacts.. and there's nothing confusing about the diameter calculation. 1.8 x 10 ^ -3 is equal to 0.0018 right? which is 0.18 %? or 18/10000.
oh actually I just found one that is 5.4 x 10 ^ -3.. or 54/10000.. but that one's a little smaller, only 7 metres across, so...
Im lookin at this chart: http://neo.jpl.nasa.gov/risk/ |
if just anyone could calculate comet pats and orbit decay by scribbling a few numbers down and dividing them..wed h ave been to pluto and back by now
not trying to trash you...but seriously...come on now
just stick to calling me names etc
state the diff equations you used to base these numbers and your calculations on..lol