Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Post New Thread Reply

Register GFY Rules Calendar
Go Back   GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum > >
Discuss what's fucking going on, and which programs are best and worst. One-time "program" announcements from "established" webmasters are allowed.

 
Thread Tools
Old 12-04-2010, 08:44 PM   #51
SuckOnThis
So Fucking Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: In my head
Posts: 6,844
Quote:
Originally Posted by SallyRand View Post
The Warmonger, Barack H.Obama is sending valiant American warriors to fight, be wounded and in many cases die, FOR JUST FUCKING WHAT?

WHERE IT THE HOPE?

WHERE IS THE CHANGE?

WHERE IS THE HOPE FOR CHANGE?

It's Viet Nam all over again but TWICE OVER!:

Goddamn there is some seriously retarded people on this planet, are you collecting any type of disability?
SuckOnThis is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2010, 08:46 PM   #52
The Demon
Confirmed User
 
The Demon's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 7,336
Quote:
Goddamn there is(ARE) some seriously retarded people on this planet, are you collecting any type of disability?
Fixed, perhaps you shouldn't be calling anyone retarded..
__________________
Greed is Good
The Demon is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2010, 08:48 PM   #53
Bill8
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,901
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Demon View Post
If you don't have an answer to the rhetorical point that certain factions don't blame Obama but instead continue blaming the right, better to be silent or emphasize some other issue. Stop attempting to be a pseudointellectual.
de nada. and by definition I am a psuedointellectual, this is gofuckyourself.

An Answer To The Rhetorical Points

to the extent that Bush and teh republicans are liable for the wars, they should be held responsible for them, and they will be, and are.

Republican base attempts to transfer that blame to obama are shallow and obvious, and except for the republican base, nobody takes them seriously (polls shouldn't be trusted, but polls do seem to agree on this).

to the extent that obama is continuing republican AND democratic policies of pro war, and continuing to fund these wars long after it's become clear they were insane mistakes at best, he and democrats should and will be held liable for that, and they will, because substantial numbers like myself will never put a check next to obamas name for anything ever again.

Democrat base attempts to excuse obama for acting like a republican dickhead are disgusting to me personally, but are fundamentally no better or worse than what the republicans did, are doing, and will do.

so ultimately, it's about a draw on the asinine political and rhetorical behavior meter.

personally I blame obama more, because he campaigned in a way that took advantage of peoples hopes, lied, and betrayed everyone to the corporations. he was weak when we needed somebody willing to fight like hell.

but Bush started the war, it will always be Bush who started the war, and republican base attempts to rewrite history in their own minds is pathetic to watch.

that it's pathetic will not stop your side from doing it. that it's disgusting will not stop my side from doing it.

that means, as a rhetorical point as a whole, it's a null. no effect, a rhetorical dead end. thats why its popular, it's a useful distraction to trap an unskilled opponent.

because it's a dead end, I dont usually bother to address it, but what the hell, right, since we're buddies and all.

blah blah blah - one of the problems with a rhetorical dead end is that it's impossible to be original with it. the endless loop keeps out any new information.

Last edited by Bill8; 12-04-2010 at 08:50 PM..
Bill8 is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2010, 08:50 PM   #54
kane
Too lazy to set a custom title
 
kane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: portland, OR
Posts: 20,684
I listened to all three of these and the guy has a lot of good stuff to say. But he really mentions nothing about a double dip economy. What he does say is that things aren't great (obviously) and that unless we make some changes in the way we are dealing with these problems they will not get better.

The only part he mentions a double dip is when he says some stuff about how now that we have spent all this stimulus money and the fed has manipulated the economy there needs to be an end game. The fed and the government will eventually have to pull out and how they go about that is what will determine a double dip. If they have a bad plan for ending things, it could get very ugly very quickly and we could double dip. If they pull it off though, it might not happen.

So to me, it seems like he is saying we might have a double dip recession, not that we absolutely will.
kane is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2010, 08:50 PM   #55
minicivan
Confirmed User
 
minicivan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 943
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Demon View Post
I would ask for proof of this stupidity but I sense you'll either ignore the question or continue going off on a tangent.
Thats like being asked to prove that water is wet. All I ever see you do is attack the typically liberal politics with the typical conservative position. And ironically, you do it with the same narrow mindedness as slutboat.

It wouldn't surprise me if you both ended up on a rooftop together, sniping people at a mall with high powered rifles someplace.
minicivan is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2010, 08:53 PM   #56
The Demon
Confirmed User
 
The Demon's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 7,336
Quote:
Originally Posted by minicivan View Post
Thats like being asked to prove that water is wet. All I ever see you do is attack the typically liberal politics with the typical conservative position. And ironically, you do it with the same narrow mindedness as slutboat.
So you prove that you have absolutely no idea what the "typical conservative position" is, and that you don't read well to lump my posts in with slutboat. Glad we got that straightened out.

Quote:
It wouldn't surprise me if you both ended up on a rooftop together, sniping people at a mall with high powered rifles someplace.
OHHH you must be one of those insecure social rejects who believes he's a free thinker and unique because he says "both parties are two sides of the same coin!!"
__________________
Greed is Good
The Demon is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2010, 08:56 PM   #57
The Demon
Confirmed User
 
The Demon's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 7,336
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill8 View Post
de nada. and by definition I am a psuedointellectual, this is gofuckyourself.

An Answer To The Rhetorical Points

to the extent that Bush and teh republicans are liable for the wars, they should be held responsible for them, and they will be, and are.
Which was never a question so the point is moot.

Quote:
Republican base attempts to transfer that blame to obama are shallow and obvious, and except for the republican base, nobody takes them seriously (polls shouldn't be trusted, but polls do seem to agree on this).
And on the other side, Democrats base attempts to transfer the blame to Bush and the Republicans are equally shallow and obvious and except for the Democratic base, nobody takes them seriously. And you'd need to show what "polls" prove this because I can show you the exact opposite.



Everything else I agree with.
__________________
Greed is Good
The Demon is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2010, 09:04 PM   #58
minicivan
Confirmed User
 
minicivan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 943
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Demon View Post
So you prove that you have absolutely no idea what the "typical conservative position" is, and that you don't read well to lump my posts in with slutboat. Glad we got that straightened out.
We can play semantics all night long. Do you really care what I think? You seem pretty defensive for me being so wrong.


Quote:
OHHH you must be one of those insecure social rejects who believes he's a free thinker and unique because he says "both parties are two sides of the same coin!!"
Actually, I already said the same. I don't think i am anything other than someone who is honest with himself about his own views and experience and the obvious fact that with those views and experience, come personal bias... personal bias which I don't attempt to disguise as "being right". As a reasonable person, I realize that in our two party system, which is also fundamentally a system of two opposing views, that my view represents just one side and being that I understand that it represents only one side, as well as being a biased viewpoint, I understand that I can also be wrong.

But you can't be wrong. Angry lunatics are never wrong. Truth be told, you probably have little interest in politics, your real issue is anger. Politics is simply where this anger has manifested itself, how you have externalized it and probably plays a large role in how you manage to rationalize it - because after all, if those idiots "got it", you wouldn't be angry.

Last edited by minicivan; 12-04-2010 at 09:07 PM..
minicivan is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2010, 09:13 PM   #59
Bill8
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,901
Quote:
Originally Posted by kane View Post
I listened to all three of these and the guy has a lot of good stuff to say.
Schiff has a lot of good points. His critiques aren't bad.

but it's not clear to me what his overall plan to address the fundamental transformation of the US economy actually is, or would be.

i guess it would be a "full laissez faire" plan - the only way to keep the managed economies from cleaning our clocks is by completely "unmanaging" american business.

which fails to explain why the managed economies are winning against the least managed economy in the top twenty nations, but what the hell right, you have to admit it sounds good, beat the socialist economies by unleashing business, and let the corporations run free.

i don't think most economists would agree that Schiff is an economist. but economists have been wrong about everything that happened these past few years, so maybe Schiff is the economist, and the others who failed to predict the contraction are a bunch of stooges.
Bill8 is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2010, 09:40 PM   #60
12clicks
Too lazy to set a custom title
 
12clicks's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: God's right hand
Posts: 19,788
Quote:
Originally Posted by GatorB View Post
actually the economy is improving. The only reason why the rate went up is that more people decided to actively look for work which you only do if you have a sense there are companies hiring.
Ahahahaha!

Seriously, what do you do for a living?
__________________
I'm not a dinosaur, I'm a crocodile. I've seen dinosaurs come and go and I'm left unimpressed.
12clicks is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2010, 09:43 PM   #61
GAMEFINEST
Make STACK$
 
GAMEFINEST's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: sexy time
Posts: 14,431
this is during holiday times, wait til they temp jobs get laid off..
__________________
Compound interest.
GAMEFINEST is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2010, 09:45 PM   #62
Bill8
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,901
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Demon View Post
And on the other side, Democrats base attempts to transfer the blame to Bush and the Republicans are equally shallow and obvious and except for the Democratic base, nobody takes them seriously. And you'd need to show what "polls" prove this because I can show you the exact opposite.
again, remember, this argument is a loop, its a null, can't go anywhere, can never be finished.

Thus, you now claim that that bush is not responsible for the wars, by saying that dems are trying to transfer the blame.

the blame cant be transferred, because bush started the wars. you can blame the dems for mismanaging the wars now, but can't change the timeline and claim they are trying to transfer blame, because Bush's blame is not theirs to transfer.

your one rhetorical move is to say teh incumbent dems supported the wars too, so bush doesn't have all the blame, but the incumbent dems are trying to transfer their responsibility onto bush. I'm guessing that was what you meant to say.

however, bush was commander in chief, despite the fact that the dems at the time were craven sacklickers that should spend their rest of their lives ashamed (but wont), Bush was still the man who pulled the trigger.

---

good, the mention of polls without a reference was the one real weakness in the endless loop of that argument. an information challenge, always effective.

lets see if google helps me find teh polls I read - i don't keep a list of this stuff...

I recall this cbs poll "the iraq war was a mistake" - but that's not the one I was thinking of http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_1...56-503544.html

no, searched a bit and haven't found it yet, a poll result I believed I read earlier this year, since I'm not willing to keep searching, i say touche on the information challenge.

Last edited by Bill8; 12-04-2010 at 09:47 PM..
Bill8 is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2010, 02:49 AM   #63
SomeCreep
:glugglug
 
SomeCreep's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Where the Wild Things Are
Posts: 26,118
Quote:
Originally Posted by GAMEFINEST View Post
After the holidays, I sense a huge slowdown coming...
People have been saying that since the market hit bottom in March of 09. The truth is high unemployment will persist for years, but the economy and businesses will continue to grow just fine, albeit at a slower pace than before.
__________________

Webair Hosting

I use and recommend Webair for hosting.
SomeCreep is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2010, 03:14 AM   #64
mikesinner
Confirmed User
 
mikesinner's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 5,646
Just wait until the new whack job filled senate and house seats after xmas.

Let them really fuck things up. Then we will see how bad it can get.
__________________

My Best Sponsors MPl l Camsl CUMSHOTSl LESBIANSl FETISHl BJ RACESl TEEN BJl BSDMl VODl USE YOUR PC TO CURE CANCER
mikesinner is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2010, 06:42 AM   #65
The Demon
Confirmed User
 
The Demon's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 7,336
Quote:
Originally Posted by minicivan View Post
We can play semantics all night long. Do you really care what I think? You seem pretty defensive for me being so wrong.
I don't think you understand what semantics means.



Quote:
But you can't be wrong. Angry lunatics are never wrong. Truth be told, you probably have little interest in politics, your real issue is anger. Politics is simply where this anger has manifested itself, how you have externalized it and probably plays a large role in how you manage to rationalize it - because after all, if those idiots "got it", you wouldn't be angry.
Using your logic of "personal bias", I guess you would qualify as an angry lunatic as well? Also, you'll have to show me the "anger" in my posts.. Lets just be honest. You just want to see yourself type in the hopes people will find you intelligent or "unique", so you use a very common argument which is ridiculously out of context. Next time I would like to you to think for yourself, which would be ironic because that's what you're pretending to exhibit.
__________________
Greed is Good
The Demon is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2010, 06:43 AM   #66
The Demon
Confirmed User
 
The Demon's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 7,336
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill8 View Post
Schiff has a lot of good points. His critiques aren't bad.

but it's not clear to me what his overall plan to address the fundamental transformation of the US economy actually is, or would be.

i guess it would be a "full laissez faire" plan - the only way to keep the managed economies from cleaning our clocks is by completely "unmanaging" american business.

which fails to explain why the managed economies are winning against the least managed economy in the top twenty nations, but what the hell right, you have to admit it sounds good, beat the socialist economies by unleashing business, and let the corporations run free.

i don't think most economists would agree that Schiff is an economist. but economists have been wrong about everything that happened these past few years, so maybe Schiff is the economist, and the others who failed to predict the contraction are a bunch of stooges.
Schiff would argue that the least managed economy has the worst organization in the world, the FED, which is responsible for most of the recessions/depressions of the 20th century. It's responsible for the financial/housing bubbles as well.
__________________
Greed is Good
The Demon is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2010, 06:57 AM   #67
Minte
Babemeister
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Madison
Posts: 7,081
Small businesses that have money to invest won't spend a dime until a decision is made on tax increases. The indecisiveness of this administration is keeping things flat.
My mainstream business is up 26% this year. We already added 30 more jobs but could've easily added 50. We run 24/7 and our back log and receivables are at record highs.

If the Bush taxes are extended you will see hiring go up. If we have to give our extra money to the government we won't be hiring any time soon.
__________________
You might not be as anonymous as you think you are.
Minte is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2010, 08:35 AM   #68
TheSenator
Too lazy to set a custom title
 
TheSenator's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: NJ
Posts: 13,334
Quote:
Originally Posted by Minte View Post
Small businesses that have money to invest won't spend a dime until a decision is made on tax increases. The indecisiveness of this administration is keeping things flat.
My mainstream business is up 26% this year. We already added 30 more jobs but could've easily added 50. We run 24/7 and our back log and receivables are at record highs.

If the Bush taxes are extended you will see hiring go up. If we have to give our extra money to the government we won't be hiring any time soon.
I think the opposite would be true too. I don't think you are gonna be canceling your vacation because you have to pay more in taxes. You may not be able to get your golden toilet but you would still have enough for that Italian tile.

This is how I understand the Bush Tax Cuts.

__________________
ISeekGirls.com since 2005
TheSenator is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2010, 08:42 AM   #69
Paul Markham
Too old to care
 
Paul Markham's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: On the sofa, watching TV or doing my jigsaws.
Posts: 52,943
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vendzilla View Post
depends if the incoming congress can make changes that will make the businessmen of the US more confident about expanding and investing than they have been in the last 4 years
Some have been. Only problem is they invest overseas. Saw a thread here today about out sourcing in the Philippines. Phone the bank and your odds of getting through to India are high. Look at the labels on everything you buy.

Full employment won't happen by building Malls full of imported goods.
Paul Markham is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2010, 09:05 AM   #70
Paul Markham
Too old to care
 
Paul Markham's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: On the sofa, watching TV or doing my jigsaws.
Posts: 52,943
Quote:
Originally Posted by SallyRand View Post
I know that and my point was intended to be implied. Barack H.Obama and His Gang of Thugs intend to strip the "rich"; that is, those with a gross income of over $250K per year of much of that figure, thereby moving them downward into a sort of financial Twilight Zone; taxed as "rich" but ending up with less than those who effectively earn less.

Barack H.Obama couldn't run a lemonade stand, he has never run a business and outside of being paid as a "professor" and "community activist" has never held a real job and therefore has NO respect for those like us WHO WORK FOR A LIVING!
Much like Bush not sure about Palin. But in general a lot of politicians have never had a real job.

As for taxing the rich. Who else do you tax to pay the bills? Not the poor as they haven't got enough to rake in the billions needed. And what ever they get taxed they will try to pay as little as they can to avoid taxes. Look at the wages of tax attorneys and accountants. Not the poor paying them.

There's only one thing to get an economy rolling and full employment. Production and manufacturing in the country.
Paul Markham is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2010, 09:29 AM   #71
Minte
Babemeister
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Madison
Posts: 7,081
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheSenator View Post
I think the opposite would be true too. I don't think you are gonna be canceling your vacation because you have to pay more in taxes. You may not be able to get your golden toilet but you would still have enough for that Italian tile.

This is how I understand the Bush Tax Cuts.

Golden toilets and decadent lifestyle is only the end result of successfully running a business. I don't know any owners that are content with status quo.

The prime motivator is growth. And to facilitate that growth it takes cash and manpower. I'm not getting into an argument about business 101 today. It's fairly clear that business has cash on hand. What will happen to that cash on hand remains the big question. It can either be reinvested or paid out as a tax.

When that question finally has an answer, people that make the decisions on how to grow will.
__________________
You might not be as anonymous as you think you are.
Minte is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2010, 11:19 AM   #72
Paul Markham
Too old to care
 
Paul Markham's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: On the sofa, watching TV or doing my jigsaws.
Posts: 52,943
Quote:
Originally Posted by kane View Post
I think any real growth we have have as far as job and industry creation will be in the technology industries. We can't compete on a manufacturing front so we will have educate people and develop technology that we can sell or make for other people.
Agreed. More education means more investment in the education system. This has to be done at all levels from primary through to university level. Grants for those talented enough, from poorer families, to make sure the best go to universities. Which will mean higher taxes. To be paid for by the lower 90%, who haven't got enough, or the wealthier 10%

Will need to be done for at least a decade before the results start to show.

And it will need a shift in earnings. Pay scientists, engineers, etc. Decent wages so earnings in high tech industries rival earnings for lawyers and doctors.

Still it will be an elite few at the top who really benefit. Especially if the goods these high tech industries invent and develop are manufactured over seas. So are they to pay the bulk of the taxes to maintain the infrastructure of the US or not?

Of course this elite few spending more on Mercedes, Rolls Royce's and Lamborghini's will help the economy no end.

If only economics was as easy as posers on GFY think.
Paul Markham is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2010, 11:22 AM   #73
Barefootsies
Choice is an Illusion
 
Barefootsies's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Land of Obama
Posts: 42,635
Quote:
Originally Posted by GAMEFINEST View Post
whats next?
You're going to buy yourself a beer, then cry in it.
__________________
Should You Email Your Members?

Link1 | Link2 | Link3

Enough Said.

"Would you rather live like a king for a year or like a prince forever?"
Barefootsies is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2010, 11:48 AM   #74
Vendzilla
Biker Gnome
 
Vendzilla's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: cell#324
Posts: 23,200
Signs of the government actually working together is rising, extending the Bush tax cuts with the deal that would also extend unemployment benefits is in the works. It's a temporary extension, but working together in the lame duck session is a good start. The unemployment benefits have been extended more than any other time in history, would be nice to see the government working together and ease some business concerns about Obama running wild. Thus they would start expanding and developing new business and stop the need for unemployment extensions. Now they need to do something about shipping jobs overseas.

Hopefully we can get rid of Obama care for something that might work, cost of healthcare shooting up is not helping business expand in the US
__________________
Carbon is not the problem, it makes up 0.041% of our atmosphere , 95% of that is from Volcanos and decomposing plants and stuff. So people in the US are responsible for 13% of the carbon in the atmosphere which 95% is not from Humans, like cars and trucks and stuff and they want to spend trillions to fix it while Solar Panel plants are powered by coal plants
think about that
Vendzilla is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2010, 11:56 AM   #75
The Demon
Confirmed User
 
The Demon's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 7,336
You see more and more Democrats coming over to the GOP's side. It seems that things are slowly going to get done now that the Republicans control the majority. If things stay the same, they'll experience an even bigger backlash than the Democrats.
__________________
Greed is Good
The Demon is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2010, 12:54 PM   #76
SuckOnThis
So Fucking Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: In my head
Posts: 6,844
Quote:
Originally Posted by Minte View Post
Small businesses that have money to invest won't spend a dime until a decision is made on tax increases. The indecisiveness of this administration is keeping things flat.
My mainstream business is up 26% this year. We already added 30 more jobs but could've easily added 50. We run 24/7 and our back log and receivables are at record highs.

If the Bush taxes are extended you will see hiring go up. If we have to give our extra money to the government we won't be hiring any time soon.


The exact opposite is true. If a business owner is making a million in profit and they know they know they are going to pay a high tax rate they are going to reinvest that money in their company rather rather than sit on it and pay the taxes. Bush lowering the highest tax rate did nothing but hurt the economy.
SuckOnThis is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2010, 12:57 PM   #77
The Demon
Confirmed User
 
The Demon's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 7,336
Quote:
Originally Posted by SuckOnThis View Post
The exact opposite is true. If a business owner is making a million in profit and they know they know they are going to pay a high tax rate they are going to reinvest that money in their company rather rather than sit on it and pay the taxes. Bush lowering the highest tax rate did nothing but hurt the economy.
You know, the numbers would actually disagree with this retarded assertion. The tax cuts at best, helped the economy and at worst, didn't hurt it. And no, if tax rates go up, the business owner will just take the money offshore and misreport on his taxes. You'd have to be an idiot to "reinvest" into your own company with the tax rates rising.
__________________
Greed is Good
The Demon is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2010, 01:12 PM   #78
SuckOnThis
So Fucking Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: In my head
Posts: 6,844
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Demon View Post
You know, the numbers would actually disagree with this retarded assertion. The tax cuts at best, helped the economy and at worst, didn't hurt it. And no, if tax rates go up, the business owner will just take the money offshore and misreport on his taxes. You'd have to be an idiot to "reinvest" into your own company with the tax rates rising.

Maybe someday if you ever graduate from your step dads basement and start making some serious cash you'll know that one reason people invest money is to avoid paying taxes. After Clinton raised taxes we had the best economy ever, but you probably were in diapers at the time so you don't remember.
SuckOnThis is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2010, 01:21 PM   #79
Minte
Babemeister
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Madison
Posts: 7,081
Quote:
Originally Posted by SuckOnThis View Post
The exact opposite is true. If a business owner is making a million in profit and they know they know they are going to pay a high tax rate they are going to reinvest that money in their company rather rather than sit on it and pay the taxes. Bush lowering the highest tax rate did nothing but hurt the economy.
The fact remains. Whether the Bush tax cuts were good or bad is moot. They are inplace.

The issue is the uncertainty of whether they will continue or not. Business can sit on it's hands and money while the administration makes the decision.

70% of the GNP is from SMALL business. These are not companies that are making many millions in profits. These are businesses that have struggled to stay alive during this recession. A tax increase is a big deal.
__________________
You might not be as anonymous as you think you are.
Minte is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2010, 01:35 PM   #80
CyberHustler
So Fucking Banned
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 26,062
Just stopping by to say absolutely nothing...
CyberHustler is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2010, 01:41 PM   #81
minicivan
Confirmed User
 
minicivan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 943
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Demon View Post
I don't think you understand what semantics means.
Really? Semantics.. meaning you were most likely going to go ahead and start splitting hairs with word definitions, uses and meanings to position some of your arguments as libertarian or something not conservative as a weak attempt to save face.

At the end of the day, you are a broken record. Slutboat is a broken record. You are constantly on the right of an issue, criticizing the left, using the same tired arguments and retorts.. just as he is constantly on the left, criticizing the right with the same tired commentary. For both of you, there is no other right answer if it is not in line with your respective liberal or conservative bias. The attraction you have to each other is the fact that you are both polar opposites in your views, yet ironically very similar in your personalities and personal flaws.

I could waste further time on your pointing out the irony of you suggesting someone else think for themselves on an issue - but why keep killing pixels.

Last edited by minicivan; 12-05-2010 at 01:44 PM..
minicivan is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2010, 01:44 PM   #82
Vendzilla
Biker Gnome
 
Vendzilla's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: cell#324
Posts: 23,200
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Demon View Post
You see more and more Democrats coming over to the GOP's side. It seems that things are slowly going to get done now that the Republicans control the majority. If things stay the same, they'll experience an even bigger backlash than the Democrats.
there are a lot of senate seats up 2012, so yes, they will vote more conservative in the next year
__________________
Carbon is not the problem, it makes up 0.041% of our atmosphere , 95% of that is from Volcanos and decomposing plants and stuff. So people in the US are responsible for 13% of the carbon in the atmosphere which 95% is not from Humans, like cars and trucks and stuff and they want to spend trillions to fix it while Solar Panel plants are powered by coal plants
think about that
Vendzilla is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2010, 02:07 PM   #83
moeloubani
Confirmed User
 
moeloubani's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Ontario
Posts: 4,235
lol what? bush started those wars...not obama

if you guys leave now then you basically went in to the country destroyed it and left it all fucked up - giving millions of people a perfectly legitimate reason to go fuck the United States up
moeloubani is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2010, 02:08 PM   #84
moeloubani
Confirmed User
 
moeloubani's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Ontario
Posts: 4,235
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Demon View Post
You see more and more Democrats coming over to the GOP's side. It seems that things are slowly going to get done now that the Republicans control the majority. If things stay the same, they'll experience an even bigger backlash than the Democrats.
Things are starting to get done? I thought they didn't take power until next year.
moeloubani is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2010, 02:13 PM   #85
djroof
JuicyDevils.gr Owner
 
djroof's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Greece
Posts: 25,392
future is bad I think...
djroof is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2010, 02:15 PM   #86
SuckOnThis
So Fucking Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: In my head
Posts: 6,844
Quote:
Originally Posted by Minte View Post
The fact remains. Whether the Bush tax cuts were good or bad is moot. They are inplace.

The issue is the uncertainty of whether they will continue or not. Business can sit on it's hands and money while the administration makes the decision.
An issue for what? Are you saying companies are holding off hiring people because their tax rate may increase by 4.5%? If they do hire people they dont pay taxes on that money so if anything it would have the opposite effect.

This last quarter US Corporate Profits Were the Highest on Record.
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/11/24/bu...my/24econ.html

Yet unemployment remains high. This is partly due to outsourcing and partly due to a lower tax rate, and the outcome is money is being transferred from the middle class to the top 2%. If something doesnt change we will end up a 3rd world country.
SuckOnThis is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2010, 02:20 PM   #87
Agent 488
Registered User
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 22,511
Quote:
Originally Posted by minicivan View Post

At the end of the day, you are a broken record. Slutboat is a broken record. You are constantly on the right of an issue, criticizing the left, using the same tired arguments and retorts.. just as he is constantly on the left, criticizing the right with the same tired commentary. For both of you, there is no other right answer if it is not in line with your respective liberal or conservative bias. The attraction you have to each other is the fact that you are both polar opposites in your views, yet ironically very similar in your personalities and personal flaws.
sums up that clown show perfectly.
Agent 488 is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2010, 02:25 PM   #88
webairalex
Confirmed User
 
webairalex's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 253
History will repeat itself...what happends when all else fails? They take us to WAR....
__________________




Alex S
Webair Internet Development, Inc.
516.938.4100 Ext. 218
AIM: Webairalexs
Twitter: Webairalex
EMAIL: [email protected]
WEB: http://www.webair.com
webairalex is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2010, 02:27 PM   #89
djroof
JuicyDevils.gr Owner
 
djroof's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Greece
Posts: 25,392
maybe...
djroof is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2010, 03:05 PM   #90
Minte
Babemeister
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Madison
Posts: 7,081
Quote:
Originally Posted by SuckOnThis View Post
An issue for what? Are you saying companies are holding off hiring people because their tax rate may increase by 4.5%? If they do hire people they dont pay taxes on that money so if anything it would have the opposite effect.

This last quarter US Corporate Profits Were the Highest on Record.
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/11/24/bu...my/24econ.html

Yet unemployment remains high. This is partly due to outsourcing and partly due to a lower tax rate, and the outcome is money is being transferred from the middle class to the top 2%. If something doesnt change we will end up a 3rd world country.
What other reason would corporate America have for holding on to their money?

I do know the answer and will give you a hint. It's a part of the Bush tax code that is not well known to the general public, but has significant impact in the corporate world.
__________________
You might not be as anonymous as you think you are.
Minte is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2010, 03:53 PM   #91
mynameisjim
Confirmed User
 
mynameisjim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,985
In the 80's executives realized that they could swoop in, take over a company and totally gut it leaving behind a worthless shell while they walked away with millions.

During the 90's boom, it was fashionable to build companies again.

In 2000, when the boom was over, executives realized that you could use the methods of the 80's but instead of gutting companies, you could gut an entire country. And that's what happened. The banks basically gutted America and walked away with all the money leaving behind a worthless shell.

Instead of the American people realizing what happened they instead got caught up in partisan politics as if Republicans Vs. Democrats was a high school football homecoming game. So basically, nothing changed. Nobody was held accountable. And the funny thing is the American people have just been raped and while the condom is still hanging out of their assholes, they continue to stand by their respective political party.
__________________
jim (at) amateursconvert . com Amateurs Convert
mynameisjim is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2010, 04:02 PM   #92
Agent 488
Registered User
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 22,511
Quote:
Originally Posted by mynameisjim View Post
In the 80's executives realized that they could swoop in, take over a company and totally gut it leaving behind a worthless shell while they walked away with millions.

During the 90's boom, it was fashionable to build companies again.

In 2000, when the boom was over, executives realized that you could use the methods of the 80's but instead of gutting companies, you could gut an entire country. And that's what happened. The banks basically gutted America and walked away with all the money leaving behind a worthless shell.

Instead of the American people realizing what happened they instead got caught up in partisan politics as if Republicans Vs. Democrats was a high school football homecoming game. So basically, nothing changed. Nobody was held accountable. And the funny thing is the American people have just been raped and while the condom is still hanging out of their assholes, they continue to stand by their respective political party.
great summary. and now the parasites have killed their host they are going to the east for fresh blood.
Agent 488 is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2010, 04:32 PM   #93
The Demon
Confirmed User
 
The Demon's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 7,336
Quote:
Originally Posted by SuckOnThis View Post
Maybe someday if you ever graduate from your step dads basement and start making some serious cash you'll know that one reason people invest money is to avoid paying taxes. After Clinton raised taxes we had the best economy ever, but you probably were in diapers at the time so you don't remember.
As someone who pays high taxes already so morons like you can continue living on welfare, I most certainly do not want to reinvest my money into my "business", especially with the increase in capital gains taxes when the tax cuts expire. But I allow you to live with your $300 a month so I'm shocked you spend that money on the internet embarrassing yourself.

Also LOL@best economy ever. His policies inevitably set the course for the current mortgage crisis.
__________________
Greed is Good
The Demon is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2010, 04:35 PM   #94
The Demon
Confirmed User
 
The Demon's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 7,336
Quote:
Originally Posted by minicivan View Post
Really? Semantics.. meaning you were most likely going to go ahead and start splitting hairs with word definitions, uses and meanings to position some of your arguments as libertarian or something not conservative as a weak attempt to save face.
Sort of like claiming I have "conservative views", without pointing out what those typical conservative views are or what my views are? Gotcha.

Quote:
At the end of the day, you are a broken record. Slutboat is a broken record. You are constantly on the right of an issue, criticizing the left, using the same tired arguments and retorts.. just as he is constantly on the left, criticizing the right with the same tired commentary. For both of you, there is no other right answer if it is not in line with your respective liberal or conservative bias. The attraction you have to each other is the fact that you are both polar opposites in your views, yet ironically very similar in your personalities and personal flaws.
I bolded specific text to indicate that you either don't read posts or have terrible reading comprehension. Since I criticize the right(maybe not as much), just like I criticize the left, your assertions are meaningless. But please, continue entertaining us with the whole "I'm different because I think both parties are cancerous!!" logic.

Quote:
I could waste further time on your pointing out the irony of you suggesting someone else think for themselves on an issue - but why keep killing pixels.
Seeing as how you've been killing pixels for absolutely no reason, as well as lacking any ability to prove anything you've said, I think you can keep amusing us.



Quote:
Originally Posted by moeloubani View Post
Things are starting to get done? I thought they didn't take power until next year.
Quote:
You see more and more Democrats coming over to the GOP's side. It seems that things are slowly going to get done now that the Republicans control the majority. If things stay the same, they'll experience an even bigger backlash than the Democrats.
Read what you wrote and then back to what I wrote and tell me if those two are the same..
__________________
Greed is Good

Last edited by The Demon; 12-05-2010 at 04:37 PM..
The Demon is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2010, 05:10 PM   #95
SuckOnThis
So Fucking Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: In my head
Posts: 6,844
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Demon View Post
As someone who pays high taxes already so morons like you can continue living on welfare, I most certainly do not want to reinvest my money into my "business", especially with the increase in capital gains taxes when the tax cuts expire. But I allow you to live with your $300 a month so I'm shocked you spend that money on the internet embarrassing yourself.

Uh hate to break it to you, but capital gains is taxed at a lower rate than regular income even before Bushs tax cuts, and this is why you claim you wouldnt invest in 'your business'?
Please give an example how you would pay capital gains tax in the first place by investing in your own business. Admit it, you dont know a fucking thing about business, never had a business other than sucking cock, and most likely never paid a dime in capital gains tax or income tax for that matter. You seriously are one of the dumbest posers on this board.
SuckOnThis is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2010, 05:31 PM   #96
The Demon
Confirmed User
 
The Demon's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 7,336
Quote:
Originally Posted by SuckOnThis View Post
Uh hate to break it to you, but capital gains is taxed at a lower rate than regular income even before Bushs tax cuts, and this is why you claim you wouldnt invest in 'your business'?
Please give an example how you would pay capital gains tax in the first place by investing in your own business. Admit it, you doing thing about business, never had a business other than sucking cock, and most likely never paid a dime in capital gains tax or income tax for that matter. You seriously are one of the dumbest posers on this board.
when a bumbling idiot with no understanding of economics calls someone else dumb, it becomes hilarious
__________________
Greed is Good
The Demon is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2010, 06:23 PM   #97
Vendzilla
Biker Gnome
 
Vendzilla's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: cell#324
Posts: 23,200
Quote:
Originally Posted by moeloubani View Post
lol what? bush started those wars...not obama

if you guys leave now then you basically went in to the country destroyed it and left it all fucked up - giving millions of people a perfectly legitimate reason to go fuck the United States up
they became Obamas wars after he sent more troops
__________________
Carbon is not the problem, it makes up 0.041% of our atmosphere , 95% of that is from Volcanos and decomposing plants and stuff. So people in the US are responsible for 13% of the carbon in the atmosphere which 95% is not from Humans, like cars and trucks and stuff and they want to spend trillions to fix it while Solar Panel plants are powered by coal plants
think about that
Vendzilla is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2010, 06:43 PM   #98
minicivan
Confirmed User
 
minicivan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 943
Quote:
Originally Posted by SuckOnThis View Post
Uh hate to break it to you, but capital gains is taxed at a lower rate than regular income even before Bushs tax cuts, and this is why you claim you wouldnt invest in 'your business'?
Please give an example how you would pay capital gains tax in the first place by investing in your own business.
What does "income" and "capital gains" have to do with each other? Income tax does not penalize great investment decisions which is what capital gains taxes do specifically.

When rewards are bigger, people take bigger risks. When rewards are smaller, people take smaller risks. I don't know how it could be simplified any further. Capital gains plays a major role in depressing real estate investment. But hey, why does the US need the housing market to recover and grow? That can't possibly benefit anyone or increase tax revenues to the government.
minicivan is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2010, 06:46 PM   #99
The Demon
Confirmed User
 
The Demon's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 7,336
Probably the first insightful post you've made thus far, except asking why we need real estate to pick up.
__________________
Greed is Good
The Demon is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2010, 07:04 PM   #100
minicivan
Confirmed User
 
minicivan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 943
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Demon View Post
Probably the first insightful post you've made thus far, except asking why we need real estate to pick up.
Its called "sarcasm" through the use of a "rhetorical question" to which I expected no real reply. Of course, you singled it out and replied to it.
minicivan is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Post New Thread Reply
Go Back   GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum > >

Bookmarks



Advertising inquiries - marketing at gfy dot com

Contact Admin - Advertise - GFY Rules - Top

©2000-, AI Media Network Inc



Powered by vBulletin
Copyright © 2000- Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.