Looks like 3D "injury" related lawsuits might be the hot new trend

[$5 submissions]

If you missed the boat on Fen-phen, asbestos, vioxx, or some other product liability circus, it appears there might be some litigation frenzy over the recent release of new glasses-free 3D hardware and content products in the market.

Source: http://apnews.myway.com/article/20110120/D9KS1FDO1.html

Optometrists say as many as one in four viewers have problems watching 3-D movies and TV, either because 3-D causes tiresome eyestrain or because the viewer has problems perceiving depth in real life. In the worst cases, 3-D makes people queasy, leaves them dizzy or gives them headaches.

Researchers have begun developing more lifelike 3-D displays that might address the problems, but they're years or even decades from being available to the masses.

That isn't deterring the entertainment industry, which is aware of the problem yet charging ahead with plans to create more movies and TV shows in 3-D. Jeff Katzenberg, CEO of Dreamworks Animation SKG Inc., calls 3-D "the greatest innovation that's happened for the movie theaters and for moviegoers since color."

Theater owners including AMC Entertainment Inc. and TV makers such as Panasonic Corp. (PC) are spending more than a billion dollars to upgrade theaters and TVs for 3-D. A handful of satellite and cable channels are already carrying 3-D programming; ESPN just announced its 3-D network will begin broadcasting 24 hours a day next month.

[ottopottomouse]

It's going to be hilarious if all the people who splash out on a 3D TV so they can show off end up feeling seasick watching it.

[CaptainHowdy]

Suffer little children...

[$5 submissions]

Originally Posted by ottopottomouse

It's going to be hilarious if all the people who splash out on a 3D TV so they can show off end up feeling seasick watching it.

I'm sure an attorney would take their case. Class action anyone?