![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||
Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. |
![]() ![]() |
|
Discuss what's fucking going on, and which programs are best and worst. One-time "program" announcements from "established" webmasters are allowed. |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Confirmed User
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: city of angels
Posts: 1,356
|
Google patents porn search tweaks
Google is looking to snag itself a bigger chunk of a major technological driving force - the adult entertainment market - with a patent on pornography search technologies.
The patent, issued to Google yesterday and entitled 'system and methods for detecting images distracting to a user,' seems innocent at first glance. The abstract describes it thus: "The method includes monitoring the behavior of a user with respect to a group of images that are related in some manner to a query, and using the monitored behavior to calculate the distractiveness of a particular image." Digging deeper into the patent, however, Google's real aim becomes clear: making it easier to search for pornography on the Internet. "It is to be appreciated by those skilled in the art," the patent claims, "that, with relation to Internet search engines, the most selected links tend to be pornographic in nature. "Just as with humorous images, the user tends to select pornographic images out of curiosity. Thus, the most distracting images tend to be pornographic in nature. "Instead of measuring the selection rate across all independent queries or query classes, the selection rate across all non-pornographic queries can be used to measure distractiveness score. "This takes into account that, when a pornographic query is used, pornographic images are sought. One skilled in the art can, within their own experience, surmise what a pornographic query is." Read more: http://www.thinq.co.uk/2011/1/26/goo...#ixzz1Ce21GGPi |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
(felis madjewicus)
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: In Mom & Dad's Basement
Posts: 20,368
|
Interesting. I'm too baked to read this and appreciate it though, so posting to find thread later...
![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
(felis madjewicus)
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: In Mom & Dad's Basement
Posts: 20,368
|
I thought they already had things in place to determine pornographic content in images via the colors values? Measuring metrics in the images like high percentages of fleshy tones and such? To monitor content displayed in Images. I suppose these new factors, combined with the old, would be an excellent move forward.
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |