More porn should be made like this...

[Harmon]

http://www.youjizz.com/videos/just-married-2247293.html

[Intrinsic]

[CurrentlySober]

That to me, is simply porn for women...

[Harmon]

[CurrentlySober]

Originally Posted by Harmon

I thought you had me on 'Ignore'



Theres a 'better one' if you want it

[drmadcat]

i would not wank over that

[Harmon]

[CurrentlySober]

Originally Posted by Harmon

I'm gutted ! So upset

[Paul Markham]

Originally Posted by CurrentlySober

That to me, is simply porn for women...

A similar product can be shot for men. Just not on a cut price budget. Well it can but the people who can do it aren't working for a cut price.

Must show this to my stalker Cherry, so he can see how it should be done.

I loved it.

[marlboroack]

This is the Michael Jordan of Porn, all slowmo and shit. I knew you watched free porn.

[L-Pink]

That's how I make love to the ladies ..... but with a much bigger cock of course.

.

[Captain Kawaii]

Thats cool stuff. Nicely done... Perfect for the couples market.

[seeandsee]

Originally Posted by Harmon

http://www.youjizz.com/videos/just-married-2247293.html

thanks for jrk material, nice

[marcop]

There's something creepy about that. And the music doesn't work with the video... it's kinda foreboding and sets completely the wrong tone for the action.

[Harmon]

Originally Posted by marcop

There's something creepy about that. And the music doesn't work with the video... it's kinda foreboding and sets completely the wrong tone for the action.

No, instead let's muster up some 80's funkadelic keyboard/drum machine music and throat fuck a chick until she pukes. That makes better sense.

[marcop]

Originally Posted by Harmon

No, instead let's muster up some 80's funkadelic keyboard/drum machine music and throat fuck a chick until she pukes. That makes better sense.

Would that be an improvement? Really?

[mike1k]

her so thats how you make love.

[Chosen]

Beautiful

[Cherry7]

Originally Posted by CurrentlySober

That to me, is simply porn for women...

and for men with an IQ over a 100.

[scarlettcontent]

awesome porn at its best

[Cherry7]

Originally Posted by Paul Markham

A similar product can be shot for men. Just not on a cut price budget. Well it can but the people who can do it aren't working for a cut price.

Must show this to my stalker Cherry, so he can see how it should be done.

I loved it.

Notice those sudden changes? Those are shots. They are used by the editor to create the scene. Notice the use of close up and wide shots.

But of course you know this, you have written a book about it.

And you have a scene coming out which I am sure will blow that away, after all you had $3000 to spend on one solo girl shoot.

[topsiteking]

Originally Posted by Harmon

No, instead let's muster up some 80's funkadelic keyboard/drum machine music and throat fuck a chick until she pukes. That makes better sense.

[CaptainHowdy]

Most porn it's already free if that's what you mean .........

[Harmon]

Originally Posted by topsiteking

Yeah, he doesn't get it.

[Harmon]

Originally Posted by CaptainHowdy

Most porn it's already free if that's what you mean .........

Another clueless guy...

[Sophie Delancey]

It's maybe a little too soft and etherial for my tastes, but the production values are amazing. I'd love to see more of that in porn, so that's what we're doing with The Art of Blowjob.

[96ukssob]

Originally Posted by CurrentlySober

I thought you had me on 'Ignore'



Theres a 'better one' if you want it

you are a creepy looking man, i must say

[Harmon]

Originally Posted by Sophie Delancey

It's maybe a little too soft and etherial for my tastes, but the production values are amazing. I'd love to see more of that in porn, so that's what we're doing with The Art of Blowjob.

Yes you are doing just that. Keep on keepin on.

"Soft" may be what people need. Maybe is they saw some sensual acticity instead of jam my cock rape style in your asshole, show the fat camera guy the hole with cum gurgling out, people would get somewhat emotionally attached and not mind paying for it.

Who fuckin knows...

[Paul&John]

I'm pretty sure it's from X-art (x-cash), the content over there looks extremely hot..

just check out this gallery

[Barry-xlovecam]

Wide screen cinematography, good background, audio, camera work, etc.

However, there are no Academy Awards for the best porn entries.

Nice stuff (high class) that would appeal to the women in the audience ...

[CurrentlySober]

Originally Posted by bossku69

you are a creepy looking man, i must say

[marcop]

Originally Posted by Harmon

Yeah, he doesn't get it.

[CaptainHowdy]

Originally Posted by Harmon

Another clueless guy...

No, I get it. That's porn for feminine men.

[Harmon]

Originally Posted by CaptainHowdy

No, I get it. That's porn for feminine men.

https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1032222

https://gfy.com/showpost.php?p=18317079&postcount=2

You like guys that are dressed like women and would like to fuck them in the ass... they don't have a vagina, and hopefully they need to shave as often as you and I. The have balls and cock. It's a guy.

[Paul Markham]

This isn't a hard scene to shoot. Soft focus filter, mood lighting and a loving passionate couple just left to get on with it. Some angles were missed and some were wrong, like the knee in the camera lens, the shooter should of been a touch higher. He should of also tried to shoot from slightly behind, close up and to the couples left, capturing penetration and the girls pleasure. But we can all look at work afterwards and pass comments on how it could of been done.

Maybe a better intro or even an intro would of been nice.

The problem with shooting this is paying for it. Phone Viv Thomas and ask him his price.

http://hosted.x-art.com/galleries/sh...php?PA=2227940 nice.

[Far-L]

Originally Posted by Harmon

http://www.youjizz.com/videos/just-married-2247293.html

It isn't that bad and it is fair to say that you and you specifically wish there were more vids like that... but ... I have to ask, from a marketing perspective that addresses the needs of customers, why? If people wanted it then I guarantee more people would be shooting it.

imho, it is utterly false to think women want this sort of thing too... most of the women I know that like some porn now and then like pro-am gonzo stuff (yes, even with hardcore anal close ups and everything) and a fair share of them like watching gay male stuff just like many guys dig watching two girls go at it.

My on soft porn:

1. Sappy pretentious classical-esque music doesn't make a scene more beautiful.

2. Soft lighting can be nice but it doesn't make a scene more passionate in and of itself.

3. Over-dubbed moaning and groaning went out with the 70's - apparently they didn't get the memo.

4. Do just married couples really have sex like that? I think a better title would've been "wake up, it's time to fuck" because that scene is going to put a lot of folks to sleep...

[Cherry7]

Music works if it is the right music.

Lighting works if it is the right lighting...

But the elephant in the room is SEX...

Why is the sex shot in exactly the same boring way time and again ?

So much so that all the male models do it by the numbers.

Sex should be the main interest of all the films and to show it in a new and exciting way is the challenge. Put some drama into it and some new ideas...

Thats why amateur is popular its real and dirty, but with a bit a creativity ......

[Agent 488]

boring ...

[Far-L]

Originally Posted by Cherry7

Music works if it is the right music.

Lighting works if it is the right lighting...

But the elephant in the room is SEX...

Why is the sex shot in exactly the same boring way time and again ?

So much so that all the male models do it by the numbers.

Sex should be the main interest of all the films and to show it in a new and exciting way is the challenge. Put some drama into it and some new ideas...

Thats why amateur is popular its real and dirty, but with a bit a creativity ......

Agreed... and to add to that...

Good, real Amateur works because regardless of good lighting, music, camera work, etc. there is actual sexual chemistry. I call it the "XXX" factor because so few people shooting these videos actually ever get that at all and most work counter-intuitively to that being the primary goal of any shoot. We have to constantly tell the producers shooting our more pro-am stuff to back off on the "directing" (I do use the term very loosely...like more loose than the vag after the 100 man gang bang loose)

[barcodes]

I always wondered what some nice time remapping/twixtor work would look like in a porn scene lol. They slowed it down a little here but I mean like a combo of that, mixed in with some really slow shots of him pulling back with her in an o style facial expression and then speeding up to him thrusting it in lmao. I don't know.

Here are some samples of the time remapping/twixtor stuff.








May turn out dumb, but I think with the right music, lighting, and remapping it in the right places it could be pretty interesting.

[digitalfantasies]

I like it... and I think they liked it too

[AnimeFevers]

Originally Posted by CurrentlySober

I thought you had me on 'Ignore'



Theres a 'better one' if you want it

You've just made 90% of the virgins on this forum jealous.

[twistyneck]

Originally Posted by Paul Markham

This isn't a hard scene to shoot. Soft focus filter, mood lighting and a loving passionate couple just left to get on with it. Some angles were missed and some were wrong, like the knee in the camera lens, the shooter should of been a touch higher. He should of also tried to shoot from slightly behind, close up and to the couples left, capturing penetration and the girls pleasure. But we can all look at work afterwards and pass comments on how it could of been done.

Maybe a better intro or even an intro would of been nice.

The problem with shooting this is paying for it. Phone Viv Thomas and ask him his price.

http://hosted.x-art.com/galleries/sh...php?PA=2227940 nice.

This is way better than anything you've ever shot. You get dumber every day.

[twistyneck]

I liked it, it is a nice change from the usual shit that is out there.

[Agent 488]

Originally Posted by Paul Markham

This isn't a hard scene to shoot. Soft focus filter, mood lighting and a loving passionate couple just left to get on with it. Some angles were missed and some were wrong, like the knee in the camera lens, the shooter should of been a touch higher. He should of also tried to shoot from slightly behind, close up and to the couples left, capturing penetration and the girls pleasure. But we can all look at work afterwards and pass comments on how it could of been done.

Maybe a better intro or even an intro would of been nice.

The problem with shooting this is paying for it. Phone Viv Thomas and ask him his price.

http://hosted.x-art.com/galleries/sh...php?PA=2227940 nice.

http://www.youjizz.com/videos/paul-m...me-183889.html

[twistyneck]

Originally Posted by Agent 488

http://www.youjizz.com/videos/paul-m...me-183889.html

See, this kind of shit is exactly what I'd expect from Paul Markham. Ugly girls, shitty lighting, crappy camera work. It is extremely ordinary, boring, second rate porn.

[GregE]

Originally Posted by Harmon

http://www.youjizz.com/videos/just-married-2247293.html

All of the usual GFY politics and harping aside, I thought that scene was rather well done myself

[tony286]

i wonder if the models were boy friend and girl friend. Because there is real tenderness which you dont see in porn or they are amazing actors.

[Mutt]

that's an X-Art video - gorgeous stuff and they are making bank.

but for me as a surfer, their videos as spank material do nothing for me, they're like Andrew Blake and Playboy videos, pretty to look at but the music, the editing, gets in the way. now shoot that style and look and just let the couple fuck, no music - now we're talking!

they seem to be shooting more European girls and couples than Americans. gotta be very expensive but it's paying off.

[potter]

x-art is killing it for sure, their content is fucking amazing