White House Insider: "Everyone Stunned At How Little Barack Obama Understands"

[wehateporn]

http://newsflavor.com/politics/us-po...understands-4/

The one thing that almost everyone did agree with was how ?idiotic?, ?moronic?, ?pathetic?, ?self-serving?, ?arrogant?, and ?scary? President Obama?s role was during the process. Those are actual descriptions used against the president, and most of them came from Democrats. Everyone stunned over how little Barack Obama understands about anything.

Harry Reid came out of a meeting with Obama over the weekend ?visibly shaking? he was so angry at how little the president seemed to care about the process and related details of the agreement, and how flip and dismissive he was toward Senator Reid. ?Just get something for me to sign Harry?? The primary concern of the Obama White House was the possibility of the debt ceiling issue carrying forward into the 2012 election cycle.

[Harmon]

This doesn't surprise me one bit.

[cykoe6]

Originally Posted by wehateporn

"Everyone Stunned At How Little Barack Obama Understands"

I know I certainly am.

[wehateporn]

I guess a CIA asset just needs to get the job done, not understand

http://www.lewrockwell.com/orig10/ross-s3.1.1.html

[Barefootsies]

Originally Posted by wehateporn

I guess a CIA asset just needs to get the job done, not understand

http://www.lewrockwell.com/orig10/ross-s3.1.1.html

Canadian Illuminati?

[Sly]

The constant mention of the 2012 election cycle bothered me.

[wehateporn]

Originally Posted by Barefootsies

Canadian Illuminati?

Perhaps Obama has some of these playing cards from 1995

[ottopottomouse]

He's a figurehead and doesn't need to understand anything.

[Minte]

Originally Posted by wehateporn

http://newsflavor.com/politics/us-po...understands-4/

The presidents teleprompter guy was out sick that day. He had to *wing it*.

[AsianDivaGirlsWebDude]

Yeah, as if Dubya was a mental heavy lifter...





Newsflavor, what a great source (of totally biased BS and propaganda). Ulsterman, the author of the article you cited is an anonymous poster, which no doubt bolsters his credibility (with like-minded lemmings).

Intro to Ulsterman

For the past several weeks, a writer who goes only by "Ulsterman" has produced a series of interviews with a nameless "White House Insider," who he claims has close access to the inner workings of the Obama Administration. Since the first appearance of the "Insider" in September, "Ulsterman" has published more than a dozen supposed interviews with his own personal Deep Throat.

Some people have completely bought into these stories, while others have been more skeptical.

And for good reason. "Ulsterman" offers no evidence that he's an actual reporter, or that he has any legitimate contacts. The websites that he submits articles to, such as Newsflavor, are for user-submitted content, and have no editorial oversight. He is an anonymous person claiming to interview a second anonymous person. And as time has gone on, more people have begun to believe that the "Insider" is nothing but an attempt at a hoax, as the "interviews" have become increasingly conversational and unprofessional, resembling bad fiction more than actual conversations with a valued asset.

The important question is: can it be proven that "Ulsterman" has made up stories? The answer is: yes. "Ulsterman" has repeatedly made up individual subjects, given them fake jobs and employers, and fabricated whole interviews with these imaginary people.

With "the Washington Insider," he kept his fake person anonymous, so that his fraud couldn't be exposed directly. But in multiple other articles, he wasn't so careful, and he simply presented fiction as if it were news.

In all, "Ulsterman" has used fabricated interviews in at least seven articles he wrote and published between September and November. Four of these articles he has already scrubbed. Below, you will see each of those seven articles exposed as the lie it is.

CONTINUE ARTICLE HERE

And there's more...

The Unbelievable Adventures Of Ulsterman, Super-Journalist
May 04, 2011 3:20 pm ET by Ben Dimiero

Yesterday, noted conspiracist, Islamophobe, and Fox Business regular Pam Geller forwarded an explosive allegation: that the military had "overruled" President Obama's order to abort the Osama bin Laden kill mission. As we detailed, Geller is so committed to trying to make Obama look bad that she was willing to casually accuse the military of essentially committing sedition. (Geller later updated with a second story that contradicted the details of the first.)

Her source for the allegation and the update was an anonymous writer named "Ulsterman," who regularly posts articles at "NewsFlavor" and other sites with user-submitted content. Ulsterman can be found tackling tough issues like whether Julia Roberts has gotten a "boob job" or if "a few more pizzas really account for the considerable increase in her breast size." Of more interest, however, are Ulsterman's series of "interviews" with a "long time D.C. insider" making fantastical allegations about the goings-on in the Obama administration.

Ulsterman's interviews with the "White House Insider" don't pass the smell test.

Here's a snippet of one of the "insider's" answers from an interview Ulsterman published yesterday regarding the bin Laden mission. The "insider" purports to describe the dynamic in the room during the "now famous photo" of Obama and his national security team during the bin Laden raid. Apparently, Obama's national security team just pretended he wasn't there:

Another interesting tidbit regarding this is that the Vice President was already "up to speed" on the operation. A source indicated they believe Hillary Clinton had personally made certain the Vice President was made aware of that day's events before the president was. The now famous photo released shows the particulars of that of that room and its occupants. What that photo does not communicate directly is that the military personnel present in that room during the operation unfolding, deferred to either Hillary Clinton or Robert Gates. The president's role was minimal, including their acknowledging of his presence in the room.

And here's another comment from "the insider" from earlier in the interview:

Panetta then made plans to proceed with an on-ground assault. This information reached either Hillary Clinton or Robert Gates first (likely via military contacts directly associated with the impending mission) who then informed the other. Those two then met with Panetta, who informed each of them he had been given the authority by the president to proceed with a mission if the opportunity presented itself. Both Gates and Clinton warned Panetta of the implications of that authority - namely he was possibly being made into a scapegoat.

We are supposed to believe this "insider" is privy to the intricate details -- right down to a play-by-play of conversations between the Director of the CIA, the Secretary of State, and the Secretary of Defense -- of some of the most important and closely guarded national security meetings in recent history, and chose to share this unvarnished information with an anonymous blogger who writes for a user-submitted content farm?

Last year, Ulsterman published a series of "insider" interviews alleging that there was a scandal of some kind breaking soon -- a scandal so serious that it could only be discussed using clichés. The supposed conversations about this scandal read like high school-level fiction written by someone that has read too many Tom Clancy novels:

Specifically on the White House scandal again - I was told a report was coming soon. Something from a mainstream media outlet. Have you heard something similar? Where did you hear that? Your newspaper days coming back to you now?

Here's just one example, documented by a website committed to detailing Ulsterman's fabrications. Last November, Ulsterman ran an article at Newsflavor about a Mount Royal University "professor" named "Jan Wendt" who had supposedly declared conservatism a "mental illness" in a study that was going to be published in the "Canadian Journal of Naturalism."

However:

There is no Professor Jan Wendt at Mount Royal University. There is also no such publication as the Canadian Journal of Naturalism. If there was, a sociological study on partisan belief would not be published in a naturalism journal.

Jan Wendt is a fictional creation of "Ulsterman," and so are all the quotes he attributes to her. And not only is the interview with her a complete fabrication, but the photograph that "Ulsterman" attached to the "interview" was taken from a stock photo website.

I placed a call to Mount Royal University this morning, and they confirmed that there is no record of a "Jan Wendt" teaching at their institution.

In addition to his "insider" interviews, Ulsterman has published other outlandish stories, including a tale of "Sex and Murder In The Land of Obama" sent to him "via a message to my Facebook account."

Though Ulsterman acknowledged he hadn't been able to verify the details of the story by the time he published, he posted it and decided to let the "readers to determine for themselves the validity of what the author of this story claims to have seen."

The story is a first person account of a young man allegedly walking in on Obama in the middle of a drug-fueled gay sex tryst in a Chicago bathroom. The man Obama was allegedly having sex with was "murdered ten years later shortly after Barack Obama declared he was running for President":

I know what I saw and I know what I heard. I know who I saw. Maybe it was some kind of phase he was going through at the time. Maybe he was experimenting with a different lifestyle. Maybe the death of that man was just a coincidence. I don't know the answers to that. I just know what I know. I just know what I heard and saw.

On that night I heard Barack Obama in that conference room with another man. I saw Barack Obamastep out of that room with another man. I smelled what I think was some kind of drug they were using. And I know that the other man who was in that room with Barack Obama was murdered about ten years later shortly after Barack Obama declared he was running for President of the United States.

That is my story. I hope that you share it. If something happens to me now, you will know why.

After publication, Ulsterman updated with information uncovered by his "Facebook Army" that "would support some of the specific claims" of the original story. Including, apparently, the revelation that the drug smell "would most likely have been 'poppers', a drug that is used predominantly within the gay community":

Since publication, many within the Ulsterman Facebook Army have come forward with evidence that would support some of the specific claims made within the recollection above. The strange smell coming from the conference room would most likely have been "poppers", a drug that is used predominantly within the gay community. Its smell is said to alter quickly from sweet to that of "rank, dirty laundry".

ADG

[tony286]

that article doesnt have an agenda right lol What the right has done from the beginning, the black guy doesnt belong there. But its all said in round about ways.

[wehateporn]

AsianDivaGirlsWebDude,

It's certainly beneficial for the bankers to put someone who appears dumb in charge; they follow your orders and stitch the people up, and the population just blames their actions on low IQ

[12clicks]

intelligent people don't need an article to understand the guy is an eloquent dope completely in over his head.

[Paul Markham]

The difference is, if the article is true , is that only insiders know how little Obama understands.

With Bush everyone knew he didn't understand anything. Even the people who voted for him.

And as for Reagan, well his second term was a disgrace. In any other job he would of been compulsorily retired on medical grounds.

[AsianDivaGirlsWebDude]

Originally Posted by wehateporn

AsianDivaGirlsWebDude,

It's certainly beneficial for the bankers to put someone who appears dumb in charge; they follow your orders and stitch the people up, and the population just blames their actions on low IQ

Thanks for the tip!



ADG

[wehateporn]

Originally Posted by AsianDivaGirlsWebDude

Thanks for the tip!



ADG

On around 2 minutes, you'll see who really runs the show from the shadows (look at Cheney's body langauge)

[Young]

Newsflavor? Lol

[escorpio]

Time for the democrats to trot out their standard "What about Bush?" and "racism" replies.

[JamesGw]

This story doesn't look that credible. Still not an Obama fan, though.

[dyna mo]

why would anyone think a jr. senator who ran for prez on a platform of hope & change, who stubbornly clung to forcing a healthcare package through that the majority did not want while the country was facing a massive financial meltdown, would understand anything complex?

[Sly]

I'm sitting here thinking how terrible he must feel knowing people are running around saying "at least he's better than Bush." Such a compliment!

[Agent 488]

made up quotes and story from a bullshit news source. please apply some critical thinking to the news your read and republish.

[Agent 488]

who is the source of these quotes? maybe i missed it?

[DudeRick]

Two words...
Jimmy Carter

[bronco67]

Barack Obama seems like anything but a "moron". He's appears to be Stephen Hawking compared to George W Bush.

I don't even believe the credibility of these statements made by this "insider".

[_Richard_]

haha i don't remember any threads like this, with this much information, about how stupid bush was

[Minte]

Originally Posted by tony286

that article doesnt have an agenda right lol What the right has done from the beginning, the black guy doesnt belong there. But its all said in round about ways.

I can think of a number of black guys that could do the job. The problem apparently is with this black guy.

[sperbonzo]

Don't you think it's a trifle condescending to refer to the President as "Little Barack Obama"?


Just sayin'.....





.

[dyna mo]

Originally Posted by sperbonzo

Don't you think it's a trifle condescending to refer to the President as "Little Barack Obama"?


Just sayin'.....





.

the appropriate term inside the beltway is *tar baby*

http://www.bnd.com/2011/08/04/181032...tinues-in.html

[JFK]

Originally Posted by Agent 488

made up quotes and story from a bullshit news source. please apply some critical thinking to the news your read and republish.

I like this, Thanks ADG

[SL|M!]

guy was a senator but doenst know how process works? law review editor but yet hes a dummy? ya ok. if anything this president defers way to much to congress. I never seen anyone delegate like he does.

[Paul Markham]

Originally Posted by wehateporn

Something far more interesting and telling is while these guys were kissing ass, the US was sliding down the pole. They talked up a free trade area, so they could make money sending jobs to countries that pay shit wages or just straight making money for themselves.

The recent banking crisis isn't the real problem. It's a nation putting it's financial welfare in the hands of greedy bankers.

Look at the European news to see the EU banking crisis. It's largely bankers fault and Governments who trusted them. They allowed the bankers and various other investors to put our money into schemes, projects and even countries that weren't worth it.

Greece will face another default soon.
Eire needed a bail out, might get itself in shape.
UK is cutting like mad to make up the deficit.
Italy is looking likely to default.
Spain might not, but looking grim.
Portugal is also weak.

We all know the shape the US is in.

They all over spent to make their economies and themselves look good. It was a house of cards kept up with smoke and illusion. AND our money.

The money owed was due to people buying and selling debt. In most instances it's not called investing, it's called gambling. Betting on a 3 legged horse isn't bright, but when you earn money for placing the bet, the more you place, the more you earn.

When these investors brought it to a crash, they got a bail out. Now it looks like it's going to hit the fan again. Will we keep letting these clowns play roulette with our money?

</rant>

That clip made me mad.

[Tempest]

Doesn't matter if it's fake news or not... It will be spread around the internet by those that want to believe it, or those that want to use it for their own ends, and the ignorant masses will eat it up.

[GatorB]

Originally Posted by Harmon

This doesn't surprise me one bit.

Yes if you believe something that comes from a site named newsflavor.com you are a moron.

[mynameisjim]

Wasn't the old knock on Obama by the right that he was an intellectual "elitist" with his fancy smancy Harvard law degree.

Now they are saying he's an idiot.

Which is it? Is he an intellectual elitist or an idiot?