Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Post New Thread Reply

Register GFY Rules Calendar
Go Back   GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum > >
Discuss what's fucking going on, and which programs are best and worst. One-time "program" announcements from "established" webmasters are allowed.

 
Thread Tools
Old 09-23-2011, 03:09 AM   #1
u-Bob
there's no $$$ in porn
 
u-Bob's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: icq: 195./568.-230 (btw: not getting offline msgs)
Posts: 33,063
ICANN's Promises Aren't Simply Speculation, They're Outright Fantasy

http://adage.com/article/cmo-strateg...antasy/229594/

Quote:
...
There is no reason to believe the benefits for companies and consumers touted by ICANN and others who would benefit from new TLDs would actually occur. One only needs to look at the "success" of the last string of new TLDs ICANN introduced in the past 10 years -- .biz, .travel, .jobs, .tel, .name, .coop, .museum, and .mobi -- to see that ICANN's promises are not just speculation but are, in fact, fantasy.

Nor is there any evidence that we need new names due to the scarcity of available domain names in the existing TLDs. Even past ICANN Chair Ester Dyson debunked ICANN's theory of scarcity. The truth is that search engines like Google, Yahoo and Bing solved any problems associated with finding what a consumer wants on the web years ago. And today, new search technology such as Blekko, Qyo and DuckDuckGo are improving search and innovation every day, making the search market intensely competitive. That competition and innovation offers consumers simple ways to find what they want intuitively without the necessity of remembering one of hundreds of TLD addresses. Technology found a way around complexity.

From all I've seen, no matter how one tries to justify ICANN's process or the benefits it speculates will occur, it is simply impossible to defend the economics of the ICANN proposal. That is the Achilles' heel of this entire exercise. To paraphrase an old saying, "It's the economics, stupid."

The economics of ICANN's claim of more competition and innovation just doesn't add up. That's proved by the failure of the dozen TLDs they introduced in the past 10 years.

The economics of a claimed "need" just doesn't add up. There is no scarcity of domain names. Search engines long ago solved that problem and internet users can find whatever they want easily and quickly with a few clicks.

The economics of ICANN's justification that the purported benefits outweigh the costs to brands just doesn't add up. Even with the protections offered under the program, the costs are staggering. The protections offered are like putting a Band-Aid on a severed limb.

The economics of ICANN's claim of benefits to consumers just doesn't add up, particularly in a down global economy. All of the costs will be passed on to consumers, the supposed beneficiaries of this ICANN initiative, all without proven consumer benefits.

The only economics that do add up are the financial benefits to ICANN, domain-name sellers and domain name hijackers, none of whom add one iota of value to building brands, protecting consumers, or supporting vibrancy in the marketplace. And, of course, trademark lawyers will benefit as well.

Bad economics by every measure.
...
u-Bob is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2011, 07:21 AM   #2
CaptainHowdy
Too lazy to set a custom title
 
CaptainHowdy's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Happy in the dark.
Posts: 93,461
Bumpin' ...
__________________
Tjeezers.cam plus all sites $12.000,00.
Transfer within 24 hours.
CaptainHowdy is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2011, 07:36 AM   #3
backlinks.us
Confirmed User
 
backlinks.us's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 197
The only thing that will come out of new TLDs is bigger amounts of money in the pockets of ICANN.. .tel is the latest in the row of flops that are new tlds.. And like the poster said, there are many!

I hope that this somehow gets cancelled or the only result will be domainers wasting money on could be money makers and trademarks protecting their brands in a few hundred different tlds..
backlinks.us is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2011, 09:22 AM   #4
pornguy
Too lazy to set a custom title
 
pornguy's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Homeless
Posts: 62,911
They need to go back and remove .xxx but we all know they got paid way to much for that.
__________________
PornGuy skype me pornguy_epic

AmateurDough The Hottes Shemales online!
TChicks.com | Angeles Cid | Mariana Cordoba | MAILERS WELCOME!
pornguy is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Post New Thread Reply
Go Back   GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum > >

Bookmarks



Advertising inquiries - marketing at gfy dot com

Contact Admin - Advertise - GFY Rules - Top

©2000-, AI Media Network Inc



Powered by vBulletin
Copyright © 2000- Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.