Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Post New Thread Reply

Register GFY Rules Calendar
Go Back   GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum > >
Discuss what's fucking going on, and which programs are best and worst. One-time "program" announcements from "established" webmasters are allowed.

 
Thread Tools
Old 02-17-2003, 04:19 PM   #1
Libertine
sex dwarf
 
Libertine's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 17,860
Pedo books

Just a question for all of you to think about: should pedophile fiction be banned or not? In other words, should books, stories, etc describing sex with minors be legal or illegal?
__________________
/(bb|[^b]{2})/
Libertine is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2003, 04:25 PM   #2
Wizzo
2011 GFY Hall of Fame!
 
Wizzo's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Back in Texas!
Posts: 15,224
I think the people reading them should hung by their genitals...
__________________
Looking for Opportunity!
Wizzo is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2003, 04:25 PM   #3
Freestyleman
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 283
of course it should be illegal !!!
those mofos should look for something which is about their age!!

Freestyleman is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2003, 04:28 PM   #4
Libertine
sex dwarf
 
Libertine's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 17,860
Mind you, I'm not talking about pictures, but fiction, stories.
__________________
/(bb|[^b]{2})/
Libertine is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2003, 04:30 PM   #5
Mr.Fiction
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Free Speech Land
Posts: 9,484
No fiction should be illegal. None.

If you do that, you might as well forget about free speech at all.
Mr.Fiction is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2003, 04:33 PM   #6
Freestyleman
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 283
but people who like stories, fiction etc. might also like to see pictures, and whats even worse, they want more than only to see pictures. so no stories/fiction at all.
i mean this has nothing to do with free speech in my opinion.
Freestyleman is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2003, 04:37 PM   #7
Mr.Fiction
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Free Speech Land
Posts: 9,484
Quote:
Originally posted by Freestyleman
but people who like stories, fiction etc. might also like to see pictures, and whats even worse, they want more than only to see pictures. so no stories/fiction at all.
i mean this has nothing to do with free speech in my opinion.
People who look at movies with murder might kill people.

People who play video games might kill people.

People who read a book about politics might kill the president.

That argument holds no water.

Free speech is the cornerstone of a free society and you cannot make writing fiction illegal, no matter what.

Would you make it illegal, then to write a story about a little kid who is abused by her father?

Any movie or story which has sex between minors should be illegal? Any story with anything illegal in it at all?

That's frightening and wrong.

No fiction should be illegal.
Mr.Fiction is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2003, 04:40 PM   #8
Libertine
sex dwarf
 
Libertine's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 17,860
Ok, since Mr Fiction is ruining my plan, I might as well reveal it: if you want to ban books which contains ex with minors, you lose a huge portion of the great works of literary history, including most of greek mythology, the bible, works of shakespeare, etc.
__________________
/(bb|[^b]{2})/
Libertine is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2003, 04:41 PM   #9
Fletch XXX
GFY HALL OF FAME DAMMIT!!!
 
Fletch XXX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: that 504
Posts: 60,840
All Charles Bronson movies would be banned due to the high graphic depiction of rape in most of them.

I caught one on one night, and i was surprised at how graphic the depiction of rape was.
__________________

Want an Android App for your tube, membership, or free site?

Need banners or promo material? Hit us up (ICQ Fletch: 148841377) or email me fletchxxx at gmail.com - recent work - About me
Fletch XXX is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2003, 04:44 PM   #10
Mr.Fiction
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Free Speech Land
Posts: 9,484
Quote:
Originally posted by punkworld
Ok, since Mr Fiction is ruining my plan, I might as well reveal it: if you want to ban books which contains ex with minors, you lose a huge portion of the great works of literary history, including most of greek mythology, the bible, works of shakespeare, etc.
Sorry man, I didn't mean to ruin the master plan!
Mr.Fiction is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2003, 04:46 PM   #11
cafeaulait
Confirmed User
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 587
Quote:
Originally posted by Fletch XXX
All Charles Bronson movies would be banned due to the high graphic depiction of rape in most of them.

I caught one on one night, and i was surprised at how graphic the depiction of rape was.
But by definition a rape is graphic, you can't really have a 'nice' rape...
cafeaulait is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2003, 04:47 PM   #12
G Sharp
So Fucking Banned
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 1,343
It really all boils down to a spectrum. There is text and hand drawn cartoons one side and CGI/photo morphing and actual photos on the other side.

The US Supreme court drew the line at CGI. Some jackoffs want to draw the line at Text.

Very troubling indeed.
G Sharp is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2003, 08:16 PM   #13
Nbritte
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Kentucky USA
Posts: 689
Interesting question but my personal opinion would be based on the context of the story if it was something that was hardcore pedo stories then yeah. But if you ban the works of every author who ever wrote anything that involved minors and sex you would have to ban Stephen King (IT), Piers Anthony and just about every book written by the author of Flowers in the Attic.

Nbritt
__________________

SexyCityCash gets in Bed with PornoDan
Nbritte is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2003, 08:20 PM   #14
Fletch XXX
GFY HALL OF FAME DAMMIT!!!
 
Fletch XXX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: that 504
Posts: 60,840
Quote:
Originally posted by cafeaulait


But by definition a rape is graphic, you can't really have a 'nice' rape...
Obviously, but that doesnt mean you show as much of it as they did in the movie.

Have you seen what I am even talking about?

For instance. In most movies when a 'sexual' scene comes up they cut to the morning after instead of showing the guys head drift down her body and go down on her, and show him grabbing her ass and jamming his tongue down her throat and sucking her tits... etc. They cut to the morning after, right?

In some movies they show more, possibly a little nipple, some of the guys butt, some tummy and so on.

But in particular its the directors choice to show further scenes of the rape instead of cutting to the 'morning after'

Unless you know of what I refer, dont judge the scene.

Its beyond obvious that rape is graphic, bvut in this sense the definition should be as followed as in regards to motion picture such as 'this movie has graphic violence' and/or 'graphic scenes of rape'

Its not as simple as 'rape itelf is graphic.'

I thought that would be beyond obvious.
__________________

Want an Android App for your tube, membership, or free site?

Need banners or promo material? Hit us up (ICQ Fletch: 148841377) or email me fletchxxx at gmail.com - recent work - About me
Fletch XXX is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2003, 08:28 PM   #15
chodadog
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 9,736
Quote:
Originally posted by Freestyleman
but people who like stories, fiction etc. might also like to see pictures, and whats even worse, they want more than only to see pictures. so no stories/fiction at all.
i mean this has nothing to do with free speech in my opinion.
It have everything to do with free speech. As much as the thought of children in erotic fiction sickens me, it is free speech. As soon as you start drawing lines in free speech, there is nothing free about it.
__________________
26 + 6 = 1
chodadog is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2003, 08:32 PM   #16
Jamdin
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Kansas
Posts: 3,560
If you ban fiction containing taboo subjects then you might as well ban non-fiction too. That would mean no more psychology profile articles/books of rapist & serial killers.
Jamdin is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2003, 08:39 PM   #17
extreme
Confirmed User
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: lalaland
Posts: 2,120
Fiction should never be illegal.
Freedom of speech is just too important.

Another thing to consider is that the people reading that kind of fiction are probably pretty harmless as long as they just do that.

The question is what they would do if they could no longer read their sick books. I doubt they would be magically cured.
extreme is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2003, 08:46 PM   #18
gothweb
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Back in the USSA
Posts: 8,849
People will ban almost anything.
__________________

Photos by Ian X.: Distinctive photos of goth babes.
Blood Money:Your traffic, my sites, our money.
MojoHost: Still the best.
gothweb is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2003, 08:53 PM   #19
Mr.Fiction
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Free Speech Land
Posts: 9,484
Quote:
Originally posted by gothweb
People will ban almost anything.
Even Pimpdog!
Mr.Fiction is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Post New Thread Reply
Go Back   GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum > >

Bookmarks



Advertising inquiries - marketing at gfy dot com

Contact Admin - Advertise - GFY Rules - Top

©2000-, AI Media Network Inc



Powered by vBulletin
Copyright © 2000- Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.