Wow, wow, wow, this is pretty messed up - GoFuckYourself.com

digitaldivas · 01-23-2013, 08:03 PM

...fucking "woman haters"

http://gizmodo.com/5971914/site-accu...wn?tag=privacy

2013 · 01-23-2013, 08:06 PM

sounds like a nalem scam

AllAboutCams · 01-23-2013, 08:10 PM

I can not see the booking form
Some great looking girls on there

digitaldivas · 01-23-2013, 08:22 PM

i say it gets shut down by Spring, if not before...

JamesM · 01-23-2013, 08:30 PM

extortion
incoming lawsuit .

aztecboi2003 · 01-23-2013, 10:16 PM

Some of those women are prostitutes. I know this for a fact as I post ads for one lady who is on there.

EddyTheDog · 01-23-2013, 10:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aztecboi2003

Some of those women are prostitutes. I know this for a fact as I post ads for one lady who is on there.

Whats your point?

johnnyloadproductions · 01-23-2013, 10:56 PM

This is just a spin off of sites that post mug shots and then will take them down for a fee, extorting ex cons essentially.

Unlike criminal convictions that are documented, this site feels hearsay is good enough... The site owners are in for a surprise very soon if they leave this up any longer. Huge civil cases.

L-Pink · 01-23-2013, 10:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by johnnyloadproductions

This is just a spin off of sites that post mug shots and then will take them down for a fee, extorting ex cons essentially.

Unlike criminal convictions that are documented, this site feels hearsay is good enough... The site owners are in for a surprise very soon if they leave this up any longer. Huge civil cases.

Extortion is a felony.

.

digitaldivas · 01-23-2013, 11:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by L-Pink

Extortion is a felony.

.

bean-aid · 01-23-2013, 11:17 PM

Fucked up shit... one of the girls is going to have friends who don't put up with that shit. Then the owners are buried deep in the ground saving a lot of tax payer dollars for an investigation.

Markul · 01-24-2013, 05:51 AM

I'm submitting my ex-wife. Hoo-rah!

spazlabz · 01-24-2013, 06:19 AM

in their faqs they say they have been sued several times and won each time... serious doushbaggery right here. The extortion is the fee for the work they have to do to remove a profile, yeah right

CaptainHowdy · 01-24-2013, 06:33 AM

They should be given the option of hook their way out of the 100 buck fee ...

alex.missyouth · 01-24-2013, 09:13 AM

Unbelievable

_Richard_ · 01-24-2013, 09:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by digitaldivas

...fucking "woman haters"

http://gizmodo.com/5971914/site-accu...wn?tag=privacy

these guys are so cutting edge and liberal, they just want to do all the thinking for the women!

Quentin · 01-24-2013, 10:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by spazlabz

in their faqs they say they have been sued several times and won each time... serious doushbaggery right here. The extortion is the fee for the work they have to do to remove a profile, yeah right

That statement in their FAQ is an obvious lie.

How do I know?

Look up the domain creation date; it's October 28, 2012. There is no way in hell that they have been sued, and the cases have been fully adjudicated, "on many occasions" in the amount of time that site has existed. No way.

The wheels of civil jurisprudence simply do not turn that quickly.

Let's say someone filed a lawsuit against them the day after that domain was created; by now, they might have been through a pretrial hearing or two on matters of jurisdiction and standing... maybe. In all likelihood, though, the case wouldn't even be that far along.

If what they'd like us to believe is that they have been awarded multiple very quick summary judgments and dismissals in that time, because the cases never got past the first motion to dismiss, then I'm still calling bullshit.

Judges aren't quick to dismiss a case that appears to have at least some merit, and despite their claim about being covered by Section 230, the fact that they charge to have profiles removed would definitely give a judge pause, even if he thought their CDA argument was compelling.

The legal information in their FAQ was written by someone with a decent basic understanding of Section 230 of the CDA (although, most likely, much of that text was lifted from another site, possibly one with a more legitimate claim of having ironclad Section 230 immunity), but IMO, the author of it also happens to be entirely full of shit.

NaughtyVisions · 01-24-2013, 10:48 AM

I google searched a bunch of phone numbers for girls in my state, and nearly every one of them were listed on The Erotic Review, which also linked to the girls' backpage ad, where all of them were offering their "escort" services. If it wasn't for the "user submission" option, it would look to me like a site that just compiles escort listings from other places and presents itself in a shocking manner to get traffic (so hence the news article about it).

If all of these girls are posting escorting ads along with naked pics of themselves, how wrong is it really to make the jump to "potential prostitute?" Without the PP site, if I see the listings the girls themselves have up on BP and other places, I'm going to make that assumption anyway.

01-23-2013, 08:03 PM	#1
digitaldivas ..I Heart Cannibal Corpse Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: California Posts: 4,328	Wow, wow, wow, this is pretty messed up ...fucking "woman haters" http://gizmodo.com/5971914/site-accu...wn?tag=privacy __________________ ...

01-23-2013, 08:10 PM	#3
AllAboutCams Femcams.com Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2011 Location: bjcam.com Posts: 12,223	I can not see the booking form Some great looking girls on there __________________ Binance - Blockchain and Crypto Asset Exchange Chaturbate make money in cams

01-23-2013, 08:22 PM	#4
digitaldivas ..I Heart Cannibal Corpse Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: California Posts: 4,328	i say it gets shut down by Spring, if not before... __________________ ...

01-23-2013, 08:30 PM	#5
JamesM Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2012 Posts: 732	extortion incoming lawsuit . __________________ Ex GF Films \| Grab Dollars Up To 80% Rev-Share \| 255 Day Cookie \| Legal Content \| Variety of Promo Tools \| CCBill Program \| GF Niche james[at]grabdollars[dot]com \| ICQ::611-99-zero-zero-20

01-23-2013, 10:16 PM	#6
aztecboi2003 Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Marysville,Wa Posts: 1,155	Some of those women are prostitutes. I know this for a fact as I post ads for one lady who is on there. __________________ Smoking Girl Fetish Petite Ashley

01-23-2013, 08:06 PM	#2
2013 So Fucking Banned Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2013 Location: lollling Posts: 4,390	sounds like a nalem scam

01-23-2013, 10:56 PM	#8
johnnyloadproductions Account Shutdown Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: Gone Posts: 3,611	This is just a spin off of sites that post mug shots and then will take them down for a fee, extorting ex cons essentially. Unlike criminal convictions that are documented, this site feels hearsay is good enough... The site owners are in for a surprise very soon if they leave this up any longer. Huge civil cases.

01-23-2013, 11:17 PM	#11
bean-aid So Fucking Banned Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2011 Location: the land of woke sleuths Posts: 16,493	Fucked up shit... one of the girls is going to have friends who don't put up with that shit. Then the owners are buried deep in the ground saving a lot of tax payer dollars for an investigation.

01-24-2013, 05:51 AM	#12
Markul Likes Pie Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: The land that liberated porn Posts: 12,401	I'm submitting my ex-wife. Hoo-rah!

01-24-2013, 06:19 AM	#13
spazlabz Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: Kentucky Posts: 6,548	in their faqs they say they have been sued several times and won each time... serious doushbaggery right here. The extortion is the fee for the work they have to do to remove a profile, yeah right

01-24-2013, 06:33 AM	#14
CaptainHowdy Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Happy in the dark. Posts: 93,560	They should be given the option of hook their way out of the 100 buck fee ...

01-24-2013, 09:13 AM	#15
alex.missyouth Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2012 Posts: 1,870	Unbelievable __________________ skype: descargasweb

01-24-2013, 10:48 AM	#18
NaughtyVisions Confirmed User Join Date: May 2008 Location: Pennsylvania Posts: 4,204	I google searched a bunch of phone numbers for girls in my state, and nearly every one of them were listed on The Erotic Review, which also linked to the girls' backpage ad, where all of them were offering their "escort" services. If it wasn't for the "user submission" option, it would look to me like a site that just compiles escort listings from other places and presents itself in a shocking manner to get traffic (so hence the news article about it). If all of these girls are posting escorting ads along with naked pics of themselves, how wrong is it really to make the jump to "potential prostitute?" Without the PP site, if I see the listings the girls themselves have up on BP and other places, I'm going to make that assumption anyway.