Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Post New Thread Reply

Register GFY Rules Calendar
Go Back   GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum > >
Discuss what's fucking going on, and which programs are best and worst. One-time "program" announcements from "established" webmasters are allowed.

 
Thread Tools
Old 01-09-2013, 01:42 PM   #51
Voodoo
♥ ♦ ♣ ♠
 
Voodoo's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Porn Valley, CA
Posts: 10,590
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rochard View Post
A criminal isn't a criminal until after they have committed the crime. We cannot identify who will become a criminal in advance, but we can identify people who are mentally ill and attempt to restrict them from buying and owning firearms.


Fiddy FacePalms
__________________

"I'm selflessly supporting the common good, but only coincidentally looking out for No.1."
Voodoo is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2013, 01:43 PM   #52
Tom_PM
Porn Meister
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 16,443
Quote:
Originally Posted by PornoMonster View Post
NOPE. Well Kinda.
But it is the People that go crazy.

If there were never AR-15's invented, this person would of killed those kids with a shotgun that holds 100 rounds, or hand guns. Handguns just like the college shooting, one was a .22


It only takes less than one second to drop a clip / magazine and slap in another, for any gun.
That is why responsible gun owners who think for themselves will not have a problem whatsoever with regulations or yes, even bans on manufacture and sale of large capacity ammo clips. Just get used to it, it's not the end of the world, or even of the 2nd amendment.

I'd rather that crazy nut had to take that few seconds to slap a new clip on, so would anyone.
__________________
43-922-863 Shut up and play your guitar.
Tom_PM is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2013, 01:51 PM   #53
Voodoo
♥ ♦ ♣ ♠
 
Voodoo's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Porn Valley, CA
Posts: 10,590
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rochard View Post
A criminal isn't a criminal until after they have committed the crime. We cannot identify who will become a criminal in advance, but we can identify people who are mentally ill and attempt to restrict them from buying and owning firearms.
Ok, so it's more important to restrict mentally "ill" people from owning a firearm, but it's not just as important if not more important to restrict mentally "ill" people from having children?

Please explain.
__________________

"I'm selflessly supporting the common good, but only coincidentally looking out for No.1."
Voodoo is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2013, 01:52 PM   #54
L-Pink
working on my tan
 
L-Pink's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Florida/Kentucky
Posts: 39,152
The Batman movie killer was a neuroscience doctoral student at the University of Colorado School of Medicine, I'm pretty sure the crazy fucker would have aced whatever general mental health test he was faced with.
L-Pink is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2013, 01:52 PM   #55
Voodoo
♥ ♦ ♣ ♠
 
Voodoo's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Porn Valley, CA
Posts: 10,590
So, mentally ill people shouldn't have the right to protect themselves or their families. I get it now. That's a pretty fucked up thing to say.
__________________

"I'm selflessly supporting the common good, but only coincidentally looking out for No.1."
Voodoo is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2013, 01:56 PM   #56
Tom_PM
Porn Meister
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 16,443
Arguing against a test for a license only drives people to think that a hardware ban is the answer. I'm just saying that it's probably more realistic to get on board with one or the other.
__________________
43-922-863 Shut up and play your guitar.
Tom_PM is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2013, 02:40 PM   #57
Rochard
Jägermeister Test Pilot
 
Rochard's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: NORCAL
Posts: 72,875
Quote:
Originally Posted by PR_Tom View Post
That is why responsible gun owners who think for themselves will not have a problem whatsoever with regulations or yes, even bans on manufacture and sale of large capacity ammo clips. Just get used to it, it's not the end of the world, or even of the 2nd amendment.

I'd rather that crazy nut had to take that few seconds to slap a new clip on, so would anyone.
This is exactly what I'm talking about. We have more laws and restrictions about cars than we do firearms. They can take away your driver's license and refuse to register your car - and even impound it - but firearms are fine. No problem.
__________________
“The choice is no longer between right or left. The choice is between normal and crazy.”
- Sarah Huckabee Sanders

YNOT MAIL | THE BEST ADULT MAILING SOLUTION
Rochard is online now   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2013, 02:42 PM   #58
Rochard
Jägermeister Test Pilot
 
Rochard's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: NORCAL
Posts: 72,875
Quote:
Originally Posted by Voodoo View Post
Ok, so it's more important to restrict mentally "ill" people from owning a firearm, but it's not just as important if not more important to restrict mentally "ill" people from having children?

Please explain.
But we do in fact have restrictions on mentally ill people - it's called child protective services. If you mentally ill or unable to care for you children, they will take your children away from you.

And when that happens, the very next day you can go out and buy a firearm.
__________________
“The choice is no longer between right or left. The choice is between normal and crazy.”
- Sarah Huckabee Sanders

YNOT MAIL | THE BEST ADULT MAILING SOLUTION
Rochard is online now   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2013, 02:43 PM   #59
Rochard
Jägermeister Test Pilot
 
Rochard's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: NORCAL
Posts: 72,875
Quote:
Originally Posted by Voodoo View Post
So, mentally ill people shouldn't have the right to protect themselves or their families. I get it now. That's a pretty fucked up thing to say.
So now your saying we need to arm the mentally ill.
__________________
“The choice is no longer between right or left. The choice is between normal and crazy.”
- Sarah Huckabee Sanders

YNOT MAIL | THE BEST ADULT MAILING SOLUTION
Rochard is online now   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2013, 02:43 PM   #60
Rochard
Jägermeister Test Pilot
 
Rochard's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: NORCAL
Posts: 72,875
Quote:
Originally Posted by L-Pink View Post
The Batman movie killer was a neuroscience doctoral student at the University of Colorado School of Medicine, I'm pretty sure the crazy fucker would have aced whatever general mental health test he was faced with.
Perhaps. But I'm guessing most would not.
__________________
“The choice is no longer between right or left. The choice is between normal and crazy.”
- Sarah Huckabee Sanders

YNOT MAIL | THE BEST ADULT MAILING SOLUTION
Rochard is online now   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2013, 02:47 PM   #61
BlackCrayon
Too lazy to set a custom title
 
BlackCrayon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 19,631
i don't get why so many people seem to think since no method is foolproof, that the best course of action is to do nothing at all.

seatbelts don't prevent all auto deaths, so lets get rid of them.
food inspections don't catch everything, so they're out too
it can go on and on
__________________
you don't know you're wearing a leash if you sit by the peg all day..
BlackCrayon is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2013, 02:48 PM   #62
L-Pink
working on my tan
 
L-Pink's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Florida/Kentucky
Posts: 39,152
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rochard View Post
Perhaps. But I'm guessing most would not.
So out of the last two sensational cases one would have passed and the other used the legally obtained guns of a family member. See where I'm going with this …… ?

And just who administers these mental tests? Tests that will become part of a permanent record stating someone is mentally incompetent. Who gets sued the first time I get rejected? Trained mental health doctors won't touch this issue and neither will their insurance companies. Will the tester get sued by survivors if someone later shoots up another school? So who gives the test, a government employee? Etc, etc, etc ……… Ideas like this sound good provided we all live in Disneyland.

.

Last edited by L-Pink; 01-09-2013 at 02:55 PM..
L-Pink is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2013, 02:51 PM   #63
crazydollars
So Fucking Banned
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 146
Any attempt to confiscate weapons in the US will trigger an armed rebellion and overthrow of the federal government.
crazydollars is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2013, 02:59 PM   #64
xenigo
Confirmed User
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Oakland, CA
Posts: 8,067
Laws forbidding the mentally ill from owning firearms are already on the books.

http://m.ncsl.org/issues-research/ju...tally-ill.aspx

I don't know why we're discussing this as if it's some new concept.
xenigo is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2013, 03:08 PM   #65
xenigo
Confirmed User
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Oakland, CA
Posts: 8,067
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlackCrayon View Post
i don't get why so many people seem to think since no method is foolproof, that the best course of action is to do nothing at all.

seatbelts don't prevent all auto deaths, so lets get rid of them.
food inspections don't catch everything, so they're out too
it can go on and on
It is interesting logic isn't it? "Well they're just gonna use a knife..." Ya right.

I don't think these gun proponents understand that crimes involving guns are completely different than those committed using knives. Different type of person, different type of situation, etc. Guns are an appealing tool for murder because of the flexibility and distance it puts between the assailant and the victim. Knives are extremely intimate. But gun proponents see them as being the same thing for whatever reason.
xenigo is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2013, 03:10 PM   #66
vdbucks
Monger Cash
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 2,773
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rochard View Post
This is exactly what I'm talking about. We have more laws and restrictions about cars than we do firearms. They can take away your driver's license and refuse to register your car - and even impound it - but firearms are fine. No problem.
Your driver's license and vehicle are not in the 2nd amendment.

This country only became a country of it's own because of people with guns. Guns, violence and violent people with guns who wanted a little fucking thing called freedom and independence are what built this country. Trying to compare that to an automobile is just ignorant.

But, since you want to bring up automobiles... Why aren't you lobbying against the banning or stricter regulation against them? They cause FAR more deaths and injuries per year than firearms do... but hey, let's not focus on facts. Let's just focus on whatever the mainstream media feeds us...
vdbucks is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2013, 03:14 PM   #67
Rochard
Jägermeister Test Pilot
 
Rochard's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: NORCAL
Posts: 72,875
Quote:
Originally Posted by L-Pink View Post
So out of the last two sensational cases one would have passed and the other used the legally obtained guns of a family member. See where I'm going with this ?? ?

And just who administers these mental tests? Tests that will become part of a permanent record stating someone is mentally incompetent. Who gets sued the first time I get rejected? Trained mental health doctors won't touch this issue and neither will their insurance companies. Will the tester get sued by survivors if someone later shoots up another school? So who gives the test, a government employee? Etc, etc, etc ??? Ideas like this sound good provided we all live in Disneyland.

.
Do people sue people now when they named mentally incompetent?

And the last two sensational cases would not have passed at all. The guy who shot the fireman should have never been allowed out of prison, and the kid in CT checked every box for being a mass murderer and even had a shrink assigned to him by his high school.

That's what I'm saying - Why didn't we catch these people? How did the mother not know his kid had the potential to do this, he checked every last fucking box. He was a loner in high school, multiple health issues, had a shrink in high school, failure at life, who locked himself up in a basement of a million dollar house to play violent video games surrounded by posters of military hardware? HELLO?
__________________
“The choice is no longer between right or left. The choice is between normal and crazy.”
- Sarah Huckabee Sanders

YNOT MAIL | THE BEST ADULT MAILING SOLUTION
Rochard is online now   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2013, 03:17 PM   #68
xenigo
Confirmed User
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Oakland, CA
Posts: 8,067
Quote:
Originally Posted by vdbucks View Post

But, since you want to bring up automobiles... Why aren't you lobbying against the banning or stricter regulation against them? They cause FAR more deaths and injuries per year than firearms do... but hey, let's not focus on facts. Let's just focus on whatever the mainstream media feeds us...
95% of the population should not have a drivers license. With that being said, you think they should be packing?

You and I both know 99% of society is mother-fucking retarded.
xenigo is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2013, 03:21 PM   #69
Rochard
Jägermeister Test Pilot
 
Rochard's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: NORCAL
Posts: 72,875
Quote:
Originally Posted by vdbucks View Post
Your driver's license and vehicle are not in the 2nd amendment.
But it's not like we can't put restrictions on the 2nd amendment - We do. Constantly.

Quote:
Originally Posted by vdbucks View Post
Trying to compare that to an automobile is just ignorant.
My automobile is designed to get me from one place to another. My assault rifle is meant to kill people in bulk. Yet you insist I register my car, but you don't care about my assault rifle.

Quote:
Originally Posted by vdbucks View Post
But, since you want to bring up automobiles... Why aren't you lobbying against the banning or stricter regulation against them? They cause FAR more deaths and injuries per year than firearms do... but hey, let's not focus on facts. Let's just focus on whatever the mainstream media feeds us...
Now we are talking.

We do need better testing to get a DL. The test should include a mental health test, and a driving test - where they take you out on the freeway to test you. And if you get more than two tickets in one year, bam, you loose your DL for a year. (By these rules I would have lost my DL multiple times.)

I'm blind as a bat, but have you ever noticed the way they position the vision tests at DMV? I am supposed to look at the chart in front of me, but there always seems to be another chart meant to be used at another position that is closer and easier to read. And the fucks at DMV honestly don't give a shit.
__________________
“The choice is no longer between right or left. The choice is between normal and crazy.”
- Sarah Huckabee Sanders

YNOT MAIL | THE BEST ADULT MAILING SOLUTION
Rochard is online now   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2013, 03:22 PM   #70
Rochard
Jägermeister Test Pilot
 
Rochard's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: NORCAL
Posts: 72,875
Quote:
Originally Posted by xenigo View Post
95% of the population should not have a drivers license. With that being said, you think they should be packing?

You and I both know 99% of society is mother-fucking retarded.
That's exactly what I'm saying. Make it like Germany where we have to pay $900 to have a DL so the fucking idiots can't have one.

I love it when gas spikes up. The people who can't afford it are always the worst drivers. Less traffic on the roads and less idiots, win win.
__________________
“The choice is no longer between right or left. The choice is between normal and crazy.”
- Sarah Huckabee Sanders

YNOT MAIL | THE BEST ADULT MAILING SOLUTION
Rochard is online now   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2013, 03:32 PM   #71
Vendzilla
Biker Gnome
 
Vendzilla's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: cell#324
Posts: 23,201
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rochard View Post
Why do you make this out to be a Obama thing when it's really a Republican thing - Signed into law in 2001 by President Bush....
Bush enacted it, Obama renewed it TWICE

Quote:
Originally Posted by Robbie View Post
Don't be silly. Several posters here on GFY have continuously posted that since they are able to get up, get in their used 1991 car and drive to the grocery store "freely"...then we haven' lost ANY rights and we are FREE!

All that other stuff is just dumb.

Or ask anybody that lives in Eastern Europe. They will tell you that you don't know what losing your freedom is.

We just have to keep giving the Federal Govt. MORE money and MORE power!
Just like those stupid gun owners don't "need" assault weapons...we really don't "need" all those freedoms and rights!

</stupid post by me pointing out in a sarcastic way that YEP Obama is doing everything that a real freedom loving "liberal" is against>
I agree, what do we need with rights? <more Sarcasm>

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rochard View Post
You couldn't be more wrong. This isn't about poor parenting. This is about mental health. You can have a perfect childhood, and then on your twenty-first birthday hit your head in a car accident, and suddenly your mentally retarded.
what does mentally retarded have to do with being a psycho?
__________________
Carbon is not the problem, it makes up 0.041% of our atmosphere , 95% of that is from Volcanos and decomposing plants and stuff. So people in the US are responsible for 13% of the carbon in the atmosphere which 95% is not from Humans, like cars and trucks and stuff and they want to spend trillions to fix it while Solar Panel plants are powered by coal plants
think about that
Vendzilla is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2013, 03:35 PM   #72
vdbucks
Monger Cash
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 2,773
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rochard View Post
But it's not like we can't put restrictions on the 2nd amendment - We do. Constantly.
I'd be for requiring some form of training and safety courses before you are able to get a license to own a firearm... but in reality, all that would prevent is accidental shootings.

Someone with the intent to murder someone, will do so... Whether it be with a knife, a bat, a lead pipe, a pistol or an assault rifle. When someone has decided on murder, nothing is going to stop them.

Banning guns certainly won't because to do so only takes them out of the hands of legal owners. It does nothing to take them out of the hands of criminals. Yet, no one wants to talk about that fact.

And like I said in the other thread... you don't seem to care about people who get killed, or how many, so long as they aren't killed by a gun.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rochard View Post
My automobile is designed to get me from one place to another. My assault rifle is meant to kill people in bulk. Yet you insist I register my car, but you don't care about my assault rifle.
And yet, automobiles still kill far more people than guns do. Your counter argument simply strengthens mine because a tool that is not made for killing kills and injures far more people than a tool that is specifically designed for killing.

Imagine that.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rochard View Post
Now we are talking.

We do need better testing to get a DL. The test should include a mental health test, and a driving test - where they take you out on the freeway to test you. And if you get more than two tickets in one year, bam, you loose your DL for a year. (By these rules I would have lost my DL multiple times.)

I'm blind as a bat, but have you ever noticed the way they position the vision tests at DMV? I am supposed to look at the chart in front of me, but there always seems to be another chart meant to be used at another position that is closer and easier to read. And the fucks at DMV honestly don't give a shit.
It's quite difficult to get a license in quite a few states. I know in Maryland you're required to go through courses, have x amount of hours of road driving and a few other things that I can recall before you can get a license. I don't have the stats but I think most states have similar requirements. I know Michigan doesn't however as it only took me a day to get mine there after having to have my learners for 30 days I think, can't remember, but all that was required there were written and road tests...

But regardless of all that... Stupid people do stupid things. So making it even harder than it already is in what is likely most states to get a license doesn't solve the problem.

Do you think that drunk guy is going to remember all that he had to do to get his license before he gets behind the wheel? What about that guy who just worked a 16 hour shift? What about the person whose tire blew out an lost control? The person who suddenly started spinning on ice? The person intent on running someone over?

Last edited by vdbucks; 01-09-2013 at 03:39 PM..
vdbucks is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2013, 03:37 PM   #73
L-Pink
working on my tan
 
L-Pink's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Florida/Kentucky
Posts: 39,152
Rochard:

You just don't see the big picture of this lame "mental" argument. When a person is judged to be incompetent, a guardian is appointed to handle the person's property and personal affairs because you have just been declared MENTALLY INCOMPETENT. You will probably also have your employer notified because after all you are mentally incompetent right?

Civil Law also requires a person to be legally competent in order to enter a contract, sign a will, or make some other type of binding legal commitment. Now you can't even legally get a car loan!

So yea, if a person leading a normal life is suddenly declared mentally incompetent as a result of simply trying to purchase a firearm a legal nightmare will start.


.
.

Last edited by L-Pink; 01-09-2013 at 03:38 PM..
L-Pink is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2013, 03:58 PM   #74
Robbie
Leaner, Meaner, Faster
 
Robbie's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Vegas
Posts: 20,958
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rochard View Post
But it was Bush who signed the original Patriot law... Did you complain in 2001 when it was signed into law?
Yes I did. It was the govt. taking advantage of 9 guys with box cutters crashing some planes.
They fixed that problem instantly by putting solid steel locked doors on the pilots cabin.

And then Bush came up with the wrongly titled "Patriot Act" (which is totally UN-patriotic and UN-American in every way) anyway...even though it was not needed.

Now the Federal Govt. will take advantage of another situation to take away more of our rights. But since it isn't one you particularly care about...it's all "ok"

Like I said...apparently you don't "need" those rights anyway. You deserve whatever happens to this country with your attitude.
__________________
-Robbie
ClaudiaMarie.Com
Robbie is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2013, 04:03 PM   #75
Voodoo
♥ ♦ ♣ ♠
 
Voodoo's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Porn Valley, CA
Posts: 10,590
Freedom is taken. Not given.
__________________

"I'm selflessly supporting the common good, but only coincidentally looking out for No.1."
Voodoo is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2013, 04:07 PM   #76
Rochard
Jägermeister Test Pilot
 
Rochard's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: NORCAL
Posts: 72,875
Quote:
Originally Posted by vdbucks View Post
Someone with the intent to murder someone, will do so... Whether it be with a knife, a bat, a lead pipe, a pistol or an assault rifle. When someone has decided on murder, nothing is going to stop them.
Not at all.

The reason most of the people use an assault rifle is because they can quickly kill dozens without "getting wet" - meaning they can kill people in bulk with no fear of being stopped or getting hurt themselves. Their goal is to kill many - If you walk into the mall and stab someone, the end result is they will hurt one or maybe two people. With an assault rifle they will quickly shoot and most likely kill in bulk, and it will be very difficult to stop them - an assault rifle or even a firearm has a much greater range than a knife.

Quote:
Originally Posted by vdbucks View Post
Banning guns certainly won't because to do so only takes them out of the hands of legal owners. It does nothing to take them out of the hands of criminals. Yet, no one wants to talk about that fact.
I'm not saying ban guns. Fuck. I have firearms myself. I'm just saying we need some restrictions here. Anyone can buy an assault rifle. It's more difficult to buy a automobile than it is to buy an assault rifle.
__________________
“The choice is no longer between right or left. The choice is between normal and crazy.”
- Sarah Huckabee Sanders

YNOT MAIL | THE BEST ADULT MAILING SOLUTION
Rochard is online now   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2013, 04:10 PM   #77
Voodoo
♥ ♦ ♣ ♠
 
Voodoo's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Porn Valley, CA
Posts: 10,590
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rochard View Post
I'm just saying we need some restrictions here. Anyone can buy an assault rifle. It's more difficult to buy a automobile than it is to buy an assault rifle.
"We" as in YOU, or who are you including in the "We" that you speak of? I don't need restrictions. I know a lot of people that don't need them. So, the "we" isn't all of us. I'm curious who you are speaking for.
__________________

"I'm selflessly supporting the common good, but only coincidentally looking out for No.1."
Voodoo is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2013, 04:12 PM   #78
vdbucks
Monger Cash
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 2,773
Quote:
Laws that forbid the carrying of arms...disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes... Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve rather to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man. ~ Cesare Beccaria
Quote:
The beauty of the Second Amendment is that it will not be needed until they try to take it. ~ Thomas Jefferson
Quote:
They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety. ~ Benjamin Franklin
That is all
vdbucks is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2013, 04:17 PM   #79
vdbucks
Monger Cash
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 2,773
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rochard View Post
Not at all.

The reason most of the people use an assault rifle is because they can quickly kill dozens without "getting wet" - meaning they can kill people in bulk with no fear of being stopped or getting hurt themselves. Their goal is to kill many - If you walk into the mall and stab someone, the end result is they will hurt one or maybe two people. With an assault rifle they will quickly shoot and most likely kill in bulk, and it will be very difficult to stop them - an assault rifle or even a firearm has a much greater range than a knife.
And yet, if those tools weren't available they would simply use another tool. If I were intent on doing damage, I could do so with a battery powered nail gun.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rochard View Post
I'm not saying ban guns. Fuck. I have firearms myself. I'm just saying we need some restrictions here. Anyone can buy an assault rifle. It's more difficult to buy a automobile than it is to buy an assault rifle.
And again, using automobiles as a counterargument only serves to demolish your entire side of the debate. Automobiles are far harder to obtain than an assault rifle, yet far more people are killed and injured from automobiles than assault rifles, or any class of gun for that matter. Yet, you continue to ignore this fact.
vdbucks is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2013, 04:19 PM   #80
Voodoo
♥ ♦ ♣ ♠
 
Voodoo's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Porn Valley, CA
Posts: 10,590
... promote the general welfare and secure the blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our posterity.
__________________

"I'm selflessly supporting the common good, but only coincidentally looking out for No.1."
Voodoo is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2013, 04:24 PM   #81
Rochard
Jägermeister Test Pilot
 
Rochard's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: NORCAL
Posts: 72,875
Quote:
Originally Posted by L-Pink View Post
Rochard:

You just don't see the big picture of this lame "mental" argument. When a person is judged to be incompetent, a guardian is appointed to handle the person's property and personal affairs because you have just been declared MENTALLY INCOMPETENT. You will probably also have your employer notified because after all you are mentally incompetent right?

Civil Law also requires a person to be legally competent in order to enter a contract, sign a will, or make some other type of binding legal commitment. Now you can't even legally get a car loan!

So yea, if a person leading a normal life is suddenly declared mentally incompetent as a result of simply trying to purchase a firearm a legal nightmare will start.


.
.
And thus is the problem - we have mentally ill people who aren't being judged incompetent.

My friend John is obviously mentally handicapped. He operates on the level of a fifteen year old or sixteen year old. He's disabled from both the US Army and US Post Office, and "barely" exists as a private citizen. He's fifty years old, owns a house (with his mother's help because the banks won't allow him to have a debit card no less a home loan), yet his power and his phone gets turned off every month because he remember to pay the bills. He's been rear ended four times in two years but they are "not his fault" even though he drives a big truck, drives way too fast, stops short, and locks up his breaks more in fifteen minutes than I do in ten years.

He's armed with a AR15. He also worked at the post office, and hasn't gotten laid in twenty years. He's primed to go off.
__________________
“The choice is no longer between right or left. The choice is between normal and crazy.”
- Sarah Huckabee Sanders

YNOT MAIL | THE BEST ADULT MAILING SOLUTION
Rochard is online now   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2013, 04:30 PM   #82
Rochard
Jägermeister Test Pilot
 
Rochard's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: NORCAL
Posts: 72,875
Quote:
Originally Posted by vdbucks View Post
And yet, if those tools weren't available they would simply use another tool. If I were intent on doing damage, I could do so with a battery powered nail gun.
No. Firearms empower. With a firearm you know you will hurt people, and more than one. With a knife or a baseball bat you "might injure" one person.

Quote:
Originally Posted by vdbucks View Post
And again, using automobiles as a counterargument only serves to demolish your entire side of the debate. Automobiles are far harder to obtain than an assault rifle, yet far more people are killed and injured from automobiles than assault rifles, or any class of gun for that matter. Yet, you continue to ignore this fact.
The differences between the two are staggering. There are more cars on the roads then guns, and more drivers than gun owners. Cars are used daily, firearms are used once every other month. Automobile deaths are accidents, and when they happen they happen to multiple people - the driver, everyone in his (her) car, and whatever they hit.
__________________
“The choice is no longer between right or left. The choice is between normal and crazy.”
- Sarah Huckabee Sanders

YNOT MAIL | THE BEST ADULT MAILING SOLUTION
Rochard is online now   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2013, 04:32 PM   #83
vdbucks
Monger Cash
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 2,773
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rochard View Post
And thus is the problem - we have mentally ill people who aren't being judged incompetent.

My friend John is obviously mentally handicapped. He operates on the level of a fifteen year old or sixteen year old. He's disabled from both the US Army and US Post Office, and "barely" exists as a private citizen. He's fifty years old, owns a house (with his mother's help because the banks won't allow him to have a debit card no less a home loan), yet his power and his phone gets turned off every month because he remember to pay the bills. He's been rear ended four times in two years but they are "not his fault" even though he drives a big truck, drives way too fast, stops short, and locks up his breaks more in fifteen minutes than I do in ten years.

He's armed with a AR15. He also worked at the post office, and hasn't gotten laid in twenty years. He's primed to go off.
So I guess under your law of "thinking"... that muslim kid is primed to become a suicide bomber... that german guy is primed to be a nazi... right?
vdbucks is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2013, 04:37 PM   #84
Voodoo
♥ ♦ ♣ ♠
 
Voodoo's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Porn Valley, CA
Posts: 10,590
Here's what happens in countries that have strict gun control:
__________________

"I'm selflessly supporting the common good, but only coincidentally looking out for No.1."
Voodoo is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2013, 04:39 PM   #85
vdbucks
Monger Cash
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 2,773
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rochard View Post
No. Firearms empower. With a firearm you know you will hurt people, and more than one. With a knife or a baseball bat you "might injure" one person.
I'm pretty sure as a 6'3" well built man, I could knock several heads off with a bat, I could walk through a crowd and stab several people with a knife, I could poison a ton of people with pure nicotine, I could do a lot of different things. If I am intent on killing people, I'm going to kill as many as I can, regardless of what tool I use.

Besides, none of those mass murder guys needed to use an assault rifle to inflict the damage they did. A simple hand gun could have cause just as much.

So no matter how you look at it, your arguments ignore the facts and as such, are completely invalid.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rochard View Post
The differences between the two are staggering. There are more cars on the roads then guns, and more drivers than gun owners. Cars are used daily, firearms are used once every other month. Automobile deaths are accidents, and when they happen they happen to multiple people - the driver, everyone in his (her) car, and whatever they hit.
And yet, they are not designed for killing but manage to kill far more people than guns do. Your blatant disregard of the facts do not make them any less factual. And not every auto related incident is an accident, just as every firearm related incident isn't intended.

Last edited by vdbucks; 01-09-2013 at 04:44 PM..
vdbucks is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2013, 04:43 PM   #86
L-Pink
working on my tan
 
L-Pink's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Florida/Kentucky
Posts: 39,152
I give up … shoot me.

.
L-Pink is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2013, 04:44 PM   #87
Voodoo
♥ ♦ ♣ ♠
 
Voodoo's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Porn Valley, CA
Posts: 10,590
Alcohol and Tobacco deaths dwarf assault rifle deaths.

Yet, the only discriminating factor for obtaining these is your age.
__________________

"I'm selflessly supporting the common good, but only coincidentally looking out for No.1."
Voodoo is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2013, 04:45 PM   #88
Voodoo
♥ ♦ ♣ ♠
 
Voodoo's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Porn Valley, CA
Posts: 10,590
Quote:
Originally Posted by L-Pink View Post
I give up ? shoot me.

.
Hahaha... He can't shoot you. He's giving up his guns.

Maybe throw a rock at you? Chuck a stick in your direction?
__________________

"I'm selflessly supporting the common good, but only coincidentally looking out for No.1."
Voodoo is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2013, 04:51 PM   #89
Vendzilla
Biker Gnome
 
Vendzilla's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: cell#324
Posts: 23,201
Gun bans brought to you by a government that can't balance a budget!

I can't believe people trust the government, lawyers telling doctors how to do things, makes no sense, now this.

__________________
Carbon is not the problem, it makes up 0.041% of our atmosphere , 95% of that is from Volcanos and decomposing plants and stuff. So people in the US are responsible for 13% of the carbon in the atmosphere which 95% is not from Humans, like cars and trucks and stuff and they want to spend trillions to fix it while Solar Panel plants are powered by coal plants
think about that
Vendzilla is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2013, 04:52 PM   #90
TCLGirls
Confirmed User
 
TCLGirls's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: California
Posts: 3,068
The mentally ill must be allowed to own firearms. The Constitution demands it!!

[/sarcasm]
TCLGirls is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2013, 05:25 PM   #91
Voodoo
♥ ♦ ♣ ♠
 
Voodoo's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Porn Valley, CA
Posts: 10,590
__________________

"I'm selflessly supporting the common good, but only coincidentally looking out for No.1."
Voodoo is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2013, 05:35 PM   #92
PornoMonster
Confirmed User
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,257
Quote:
Originally Posted by PR_Tom View Post
That is why responsible gun owners who think for themselves will not have a problem whatsoever with regulations or yes, even bans on manufacture and sale of large capacity ammo clips. Just get used to it, it's not the end of the world, or even of the 2nd amendment.

I'd rather that crazy nut had to take that few seconds to slap a new clip on, so would anyone.
Why, he had over 20 minutes before the police got there. He just kept shooting the same kids, he could of went to another room.

Your few seconds are meaningless in this situation.
I honestly am for some new regulations, but every thinks this is going to stop something it will not.

I believe large cap magazines jam more than smaller ones giving time to jump the gunman. HA Anyway....
PornoMonster is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2013, 05:36 PM   #93
JP-pornshooter
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: westcoast usa
Posts: 4,007
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robbie View Post
Don't be silly. Several posters here on GFY have continuously posted that since they are able to get up, get in their used 1991 car and drive to the grocery store "freely"...then we haven' lost ANY rights and we are FREE!

All that other stuff is just dumb.

Or ask anybody that lives in Eastern Europe. They will tell you that you don't know what losing your freedom is.

We just have to keep giving the Federal Govt. MORE money and MORE power!
Just like those stupid gun owners don't "need" assault weapons...we really don't "need" all those freedoms and rights!

</stupid post by me pointing out in a sarcastic way that YEP Obama is doing everything that a real freedom loving "liberal" is against>
yeah sorry, but carrying a gun should not be a right but a privilege.
and in your context of being able to protect your freedom you'd need a lot more weapons than AR's.
The US govmt has drones and accurate GPS systems, you and millions of revolutionists wouldnt stand a chance.
To put things on an even keel, your right to bear arm should be extended to bear armed rockets and similar (at best), and that aint gonna happen.
AR's have no use in civilian hands, and does much more damage than it does the public any good.
__________________
"Obscenity is whatever gives the Judge an erection." -- Author Unknown
JP-pornshooter is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2013, 05:38 PM   #94
GFED
Confirmed User
 
GFED's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 8,098
Quote:
Originally Posted by KillerK View Post
There's nothing wrong with banning certain guns.
There's nothing wrong with only letting certain people vote... or only letting certain religions exist... there's nothing wrong with only letting certain blacks be free... right?
GFED is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2013, 05:38 PM   #95
PornoMonster
Confirmed User
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,257
Quote:
Originally Posted by Voodoo View Post
Alcohol and Tobacco deaths dwarf assault rifle deaths.

Yet, the only discriminating factor for obtaining these is your age.

Ha yep.

Tobacco - 18
Ar-15 - 18
Hand Gun -21
Alcohol - 21
Vote - 18
Join the Military -17
Porn - 18 ish
PornoMonster is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2013, 05:41 PM   #96
PornoMonster
Confirmed User
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,257
Quote:
Originally Posted by JP-pornshooter View Post
yeah sorry, but carrying a gun should not be a right but a privilege.
and in your context of being able to protect your freedom you'd need a lot more weapons than AR's.
The US govmt has drones and accurate GPS systems, you and millions of revolutionists wouldnt stand a chance.
To put things on an even keel, your right to bear arm should be extended to bear armed rockets and similar (at best), and that aint gonna happen.
AR's have no use in civilian hands, and does much more damage than it does the public any good.
You don't think some of the Military will stand with the American people? It is hard enough for them to shoot an enemy, then a fellow American?
Everyone in the Military Wants to be there..... Right? Couldn't be for the money, college, nothing else to do. You know how many people refused to go to the first Iraq war?
PornoMonster is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2013, 05:43 PM   #97
TCLGirls
Confirmed User
 
TCLGirls's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: California
Posts: 3,068
Quote:
Originally Posted by GFED View Post
There's nothing wrong with only letting certain people vote... or only letting certain religions exist... there's nothing wrong with only letting certain blacks be free... right?
You're correct on the first part...minors (and in many States, felons) are restricted from voting.
TCLGirls is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2013, 05:43 PM   #98
TheSquealer
BANNED
 
TheSquealer's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: In Your Head
Posts: 25,083
Quote:
Originally Posted by L-Pink View Post
The Batman movie killer was a neuroscience doctoral student at the University of Colorado School of Medicine, I'm pretty sure the crazy fucker would have aced whatever general mental health test he was faced with.
Its worth pointing out that most psychopaths also have extremely high IQ's as a general, common characteristic.
__________________
.
Yes, fewer illegal immigrants working equates to more job opportunities for American citizens.

Rochard
TheSquealer is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2013, 05:48 PM   #99
PornoMonster
Confirmed User
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,257
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheSquealer View Post
Its worth pointing out that most psychopaths also have extremely high IQ's as a general, common characteristic.
Ban Smart People! LOL
PornoMonster is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2013, 05:48 PM   #100
GFED
Confirmed User
 
GFED's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 8,098
Quote:
Originally Posted by TCLGirls View Post
You're correct on the first part...minors (and in many States, felons) are restricted from voting.
I'm talking about certain people... what if we decide that people on welfare or people that didn't pay enough taxes didn't get to vote... why not also restrict to to only those with a college degree of 4 or more years... sounds good right?
GFED is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Post New Thread Reply
Go Back   GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum > >

Bookmarks



Advertising inquiries - marketing at gfy dot com

Contact Admin - Advertise - GFY Rules - Top

©2000-, AI Media Network Inc



Powered by vBulletin
Copyright © 2000- Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.