Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Post New Thread Reply

Register GFY Rules Calendar
Go Back   GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum > >
Discuss what's fucking going on, and which programs are best and worst. One-time "program" announcements from "established" webmasters are allowed.

 
Thread Tools
Old 01-23-2013, 01:17 PM   #1
XSAXS
Confirmed User
 
XSAXS's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 651
What's a site REALLY worth?

So I'm fucking around thinking about the future of the porn biz and somehow landed here (Roald, I'm a fan):

http://www.worthofweb.com/website-value/freeones.com
Daily Visits: 864,819
Daily Pageviews: 3,978,168
Daily Revenue: $5,967
Monthly Visits: 25,944,573
Monthly Pageviews: 119,345,038
Monthly Revenue: $179,010
Yearly Visits: 311,334,881
Yearly Pageviews: 1,432,140,451
Annual Earnings: $2,148,120
Estimated website net worth: $20,342,583


Interesting. So I proceeded to here:

http://www.worthofweb.com/website-value/thehun.net
Daily Visits: 204,287
Daily Pageviews: 939,719
Daily Revenue: $1,410
Monthly Visits: 6,128,601
Monthly Pageviews: 28,191,563
Monthly Revenue: $42,300
Yearly Visits: 73,543,208
Yearly Pageviews: 338,298,758
Annual Earnings: $507,600
Estimated website net worth: $4,027,194


Then here:

http://www.worthofweb.com/website-value/sex.com
Daily Visits: 614,109
Daily Pageviews: 2,824,902
Daily Revenue: $4,237
Monthly Visits: 18,423,276
Monthly Pageviews: 84,747,072
Monthly Revenue: $127,110
Yearly Visits: 221,079,317
Yearly Pageviews: 1,016,964,860
Annual Earnings: $1,525,320
Estimated website net worth: $13,555,349


Then this:

http://www.worthofweb.com/website-value/myfreecams.com
Daily Visits: 1,441,834
Daily Pageviews: 6,632,436
Daily Revenue: $9,949
Monthly Visits: 43,255,019
Monthly Pageviews: 198,973,087
Monthly Revenue: $298,470
Yearly Visits: 519,060,226
Yearly Pageviews: 2,387,677,042
Annual Earnings: $3,581,640
Estimated website net worth: $34,954,929


Finally, here:

http://www.worthofweb.com/website-value/porntack.com
Daily Visits: 135,312
Daily Pageviews: 622,434
Daily Revenue: $934
Monthly Visits: 4,059,350
Monthly Pageviews: 18,673,009
Monthly Revenue: $28,020
Yearly Visits: 48,712,197
Yearly Pageviews: 224,076,107
Annual Earnings: $336,240
Estimated website net worth: $1,674,385


Discuss...

Is Freeones worth 5x TheHun? Is Porntack possibly worth 43% of TheHun after being in business only 6 or 7 months?
XSAXS is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2013, 01:19 PM   #2
geedub
Confirmed User
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: concrete jungle
Posts: 3,488
Considering I put in some of my best money making domains and their calculations are WAY off, I would same those numbers are horribly wrong.
__________________
Reliable web host that actually cares, tell em geedub sent ya. Vacares
geedub is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2013, 01:25 PM   #3
Penny24Seven
So Fucking What
 
Penny24Seven's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 6,287
the site you are getting that info from is not even close on the sites I own and have entered
__________________
Our site is coming soon. It will be one of the best ever! I know so. Brian and Penny
Penny24Seven is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2013, 01:26 PM   #4
Roald
SecretFriends.com
 
Roald's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: May 2001
Location: IMC Headquarters
Posts: 27,877
I love these sites!!!

PS all the numbers are way too low. Just sayin ;)
__________________


WE ARE BUYING PAY SITES! CONTACT ME



ClubSweethearts | ManUpFilms | SinfulXXX | HOT * AdultPrime * HOT


Paying webmasters since 1996! Contact: r.riepen @ sansylgroup.com | skype:roaldr | icq:
Roald is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2013, 01:28 PM   #5
CaptainWolfy
Playa
 
CaptainWolfy's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Somewhere on the Earth
Posts: 8,439
are u for real!? omfg.. :S
CaptainWolfy is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2013, 01:34 PM   #6
XSAXS
Confirmed User
 
XSAXS's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 651
I'm not disagreeing with either of you at all. But all the sites in my OP (except MyFreeCams) are traffic sites -- not subscription sites.

For example, iFriends.net comes back at only $692 daily and $1.1Million total value. But that is ridiculously low. iFriends isn't what it once was, but those numbers are insanely off.
http://www.worthofweb.com/website-value/ifriends.net

SO... WorthOfWeb's algorithm/estimation has to be based almost solely on traffic values -- not subscription values.
XSAXS is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2013, 01:43 PM   #7
georgeyw
58008 53773
 
georgeyw's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 9,864
Anyone who actually uses those types of sites is a total complete and utter retard.

It also goes without saying that anyone who has to ask....
__________________
TripleXPrint on Megan Fox
"I would STILL suck her pussy until her face caved in. And then blow her up and do it again!"
georgeyw is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2013, 01:49 PM   #8
ottopottomouse
She is ugly, bad luck.
 
ottopottomouse's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 13,177
Quote:
Originally Posted by XSAXS View Post
SO... WorthOfWeb's algorithm/estimation has to be based almost solely on traffic values -- not subscription values.
Wasn't that blindingly obvious or did you not even look at the results you posted other than the total?
__________________
↑ see post ↑
13101
ottopottomouse is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2013, 02:18 PM   #9
XSAXS
Confirmed User
 
XSAXS's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 651
Quote:
Originally Posted by ottopottomouse View Post
Wasn't that blindingly obvious or did you not even look at the results you posted other than the total?
Yes it was blindingly obvious. But I was responding to the previous guys who were saying the numbers were way off. Based on their arguments, THEY were only looking at their own value numbers for their own sites and were not taking into account the traffic numbers -- not me. Read the fucking thread next time, douche.
XSAXS is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2013, 02:23 PM   #10
ottopottomouse
She is ugly, bad luck.
 
ottopottomouse's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 13,177
If I hadn't read the thread I wouldn't have been able to pick out a bit of your post to quote, halfwit.
__________________
↑ see post ↑
13101
ottopottomouse is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2013, 02:24 PM   #11
bean-aid
So Fucking Banned
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: the land of woke sleuths
Posts: 16,493
The multiplying factor is .69cents X daily visits. It is a 5th grade calculation at best to determine a sites worth per that site. It is absolutely 100% bullshit and should never, ever, be looked at again. /thread
bean-aid is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2013, 02:27 PM   #12
XSAXS
Confirmed User
 
XSAXS's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 651
Quote:
Originally Posted by georgeyw View Post
Anyone who actually uses those types of sites is a total complete and utter retard.

It also goes without saying that anyone who has to ask....
I would strongly argue to the contrary. While the vast majority of these kinds of sites are supremely shitty, the one referenced above is better than most. They use comparative analytics based on traffic data, pageviews, etc. Is the data perfect? No. Are the conclusions perfect? No. But does it provide a quantifiable frame of reference in some cases -- when better, more accurate data is unavailable? Of course it does.

Is Alexa perfect? No way. Is it fairly useful from time to time? Of course it is.

So really... who is the retard?

Last edited by XSAXS; 01-23-2013 at 02:32 PM..
XSAXS is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2013, 02:27 PM   #13
Roald
SecretFriends.com
 
Roald's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: May 2001
Location: IMC Headquarters
Posts: 27,877
More fun numbers

http://www.worthofweb.com/website-value/pornhub.com
http://www.worthofweb.com/website-value/brazzers.com

;))
__________________


WE ARE BUYING PAY SITES! CONTACT ME



ClubSweethearts | ManUpFilms | SinfulXXX | HOT * AdultPrime * HOT


Paying webmasters since 1996! Contact: r.riepen @ sansylgroup.com | skype:roaldr | icq:
Roald is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2013, 02:28 PM   #14
Coup
🚨 PBBC International 🚨
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: /👁\
Posts: 9,931
Did anyone post tree fiddy yet
Coup is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2013, 02:43 PM   #15
Adraco
Confirmed User
 
Adraco's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Onboard an airplane around the globe
Posts: 3,734
All those sites have a base algorithm saying something similar to
1 to 2 in 100 visitors will click a banner
each click is worth 1 cent (or whatever)
then takes estimated visitor numbers, divide by 100 and multiply by the amount per click

thereby they get an estimated daily revenue based on "normal" advertising. It is usually those numbers that are then presented.
__________________
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The truth is not affected by the beliefs, or doubts, of the majority.
Adraco is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2013, 02:58 PM   #16
PR_Phil
Confirmed User
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: knee deep in dirty diapers
Posts: 1,960
Quote:
Originally Posted by XSAXS View Post
I would strongly argue to the contrary. While the vast majority of these kinds of sites are supremely shitty, the one referenced above is better than most. They use comparative analytics based on traffic data, pageviews, etc. Is the data perfect? No. Are the conclusions perfect? No. But does it provide a quantifiable frame of reference in some cases -- when better, more accurate data is unavailable? Of course it does.

Is Alexa perfect? No way. Is it fairly useful from time to time? Of course it is.

So really... who is the retard?
I can see the site uses an algorithm based on impressions per user and total visits to estimate daily earnings and then comes up with a valuation that is largely based on the earnings with some adjustment for the quality of the traffic, or for the metrics the traffic provides. However it fails to take anything else into account. In essence it appears to assume that the only method of monetization for a website is CPM advertising, which is certainly not true.

so, just looking at Roalds last post, it sees Pornhub as a Juggernaut worth hundreds of millions because it has a huge amount of traffic and assumes that all sites make a similar CPM when we all know that CPM on adult traffic is much lower in adult than in mainstream, as instead of holding a credit card, the consumer is holding at least 1 penis, and needs the other hand to search for DP vids. Conversely it sees the relatively low amount of traffic that a site like Brazzers.com has with respect to Pornhub and assumes the value is again derived from that amount of traffic, when the revenue is mainly derived from a tiny portion of that traffic which becomes a member. In this case, the actual value is most likely quite low.

if we skip the reality that different businesses use vastly different monetization models, and assume that it is true that everyone just throws their site in a CPM network and lets those guys do all the selling, and we make the traffic all of equal value, we still miss many pieces of information that are equally important in certain situations. For example the intrinsic value in the name itself. 4 years ago pizza.com sold for $2.6 Million, if it were to sell now, it might sell for a fraction of that, but even it the revenue of the site was $0 and the total daily visits was 0, the domain name itself will still command for more than the $38,000 that worth of web claims it is worth.

http://www.worthofweb.com/website-value/pizza.com

now, if we forget about traffic, forget about sales, forget about the coolness of a name, there are still other issues, for example, the site says that california.com is worth about $6000, but I highly doubt the state/owner would sell it to me so I could put a Hooker Directory on it for that price.

anyways, nice to look at the numbers and pretend sites are worth billions.
__________________
PR_Phil is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2013, 03:12 PM   #17
Some Guy
Affordable Content!
 
Some Guy's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Tucson, Arizona
Posts: 1,750
gfy.com

WOW Score for gfy.com : 4.96 out of 5

Daily Visits: 325,771
Daily Pageviews: 1,498,548
Daily Revenue: $ 2,248

Monthly Visits: 9,773,140
Monthly Pageviews: 44,956,444
Monthly Revenue: $ 67,440

Yearly Visits: 117,277,679
Yearly Pageviews: 539,477,324
Annual Earnings: $ 809,280

Estimated website net worth: $ 6,649,305
Some Guy is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2013, 03:14 PM   #18
Denny
Too lazy to set a custom title
 
Denny's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 17,240
Quote:
Originally Posted by georgeyw View Post
Anyone who actually uses those types of sites is a total complete and utter retard.
__________________
Denny is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2013, 03:15 PM   #19
Denny
Too lazy to set a custom title
 
Denny's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 17,240
Quote:
Originally Posted by Some Guy View Post
gfy.com

WOW Score for gfy.com : 4.96 out of 5

Daily Visits: 325,771
Daily Pageviews: 1,498,548
Daily Revenue: $ 2,248

Monthly Visits: 9,773,140
Monthly Pageviews: 44,956,444
Monthly Revenue: $ 67,440

Yearly Visits: 117,277,679
Yearly Pageviews: 539,477,324
Annual Earnings: $ 809,280

Estimated website net worth: $ 6,649,305
__________________
Denny is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2013, 03:19 PM   #20
tfs
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Toronto
Posts: 624
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roald View Post
I love these sites!!!

PS all the numbers are way too low. Just sayin ;)
You bastard! And I mean that in a good way. Just a bastard, is all...
tfs is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2013, 03:22 PM   #21
itto
Confirmed User
 
itto's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: world wide
Posts: 1,363
Quote:
Originally Posted by PR_Phil View Post
(...) as instead of holding a credit card, the consumer is holding at least 1 penis, (...)
that just made my day!





.
__________________
itto is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2013, 03:37 PM   #22
MilaMilan Investments
Registered User
 
MilaMilan Investments's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Bangkok / New York / Amsterdam
Posts: 12
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roald View Post
I love these sites!!!

PS all the numbers are way too low. Just sayin ;)
so right ...I very much doubt Leo would sell for $ 35 million unless its multiplied a considerable amount of times ....
__________________
*** You don't agree with my opinions? Remember I am just an ignorant uneducated Cam Whore ***

* Mila Mail * www.milamilan.com - coming soon * Mila Milan - MyFreeCams Profile * MM Investments *

MilaMilan Investments is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2013, 03:44 PM   #23
iSpyCams
Amateur Gynecologist
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Medellin
Posts: 4,436
A business, online or not, is worth whatever someone will pay for it. It doesn't matter how much your business is worth if no one is ever going to buy it from you.
__________________
- As soon as I think up a good sig it's going here.
iSpyCams is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Post New Thread Reply
Go Back   GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum > >

Bookmarks



Advertising inquiries - marketing at gfy dot com

Contact Admin - Advertise - GFY Rules - Top

©2000-, AI Media Network Inc



Powered by vBulletin
Copyright © 2000- Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.