Early US setterlers use to kill little girls and eat them up!

[Badmaash]

High!

So I just looking into the history of people who chant "USA, USA, USA!" and found that early American use to kill little girls and eat them for dinner

Evidence: http://uk.news.yahoo.com/early-us-se...6.html#8mkhRXk

[JFK]

CNN picked up on the bones as well
http://www.cnn.com/2013/05/01/us/jam...html?hpt=hp_c3

Oh Those pilgrims

[Barry-xlovecam]

And what country were the Jonestown settlers/colonists from?

[pornguy]

Oh yeah ONLY in America I guess. Never happened any place else.

[TheSquealer]

Did you spend anytime looking into how smoking pot makes you retarded?

[onwebcam]

People do crazy things to survive. Don't think for a second that you wouldn't if it was a life or death situtation. Ask the Rugby players who ate the others to survive http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1972_Andes_flight_disaster

[sarettah]

Originally Posted by Badmaash

High!

So I just looking into the history of people who chant "USA, USA, USA!" and found that early American use to kill little girls and eat them for dinner

Evidence: http://uk.news.yahoo.com/early-us-se...6.html#8mkhRXk

Yeppirs. They tasted just like fried chicken.



It's shake and bake and Ah hepped.


.

[Rochard]

Originally Posted by Badmaash

early American ....

They weren't American, being as the United States didn't exist in 1609. In fact, they were British.

[Badmaash]

Originally Posted by Rochard

They weren't American, being as the United States didn't exist in 1609. In fact, they were British.

Blimey..............

[sperbonzo]

Originally Posted by Rochard

They weren't American, being as the United States didn't exist in 1609. In fact, they were British.

Beat me to it... They were british in every way. Accent, citizenship, and the adults were mostly born in the UK.

Ironic considering the way the OP first presented the story.....






.

[Nickatilynx]

Mike, therefore so Washington et al were British... so they were, omfg..fucking terorists!!! ;)

This a better fact not taught in the US.

That the pilgrims did not come to america seeking freedom. They came to America to build a theocracy...no political nor religious dissent was tolerated.

They actually came for the exact opposite reason.

;)

[Badmaash]

Originally Posted by Nickatilynx

Mike, therefore so Washington et al were British... so they were, omfg..fucking terorists!!! ;)

This a better fact not taught in the US.

That the pilgrims did not come to america seeking freedom. They came to America to build a theocracy...no political nor religious dissent was tolerated.

They actually came for the exact opposite reason.

;)

Flamin' Heck!

[sarettah]

[Nickatilynx]

oh...additionally... ;)

The accent of the original founders of the colony and for that matter Shakespeare himself , sounded closer to the modern American accent than any current British accent.

It has been postulated the reason for this was the isolation of North America and thus it prevented it from being corrupted by neighbouring countries.



Sorry to digress, but I thought you might find these facts interesting..

[sarettah]

Originally Posted by Nickatilynx

Mike, therefore so Washington et al were British... so they were, omfg..fucking terorists!!! ;)

This a better fact not taught in the US.

That the pilgrims did not come to america seeking freedom. They came to America to build a theocracy...no political nor religious dissent was tolerated.

They actually came for the exact opposite reason.

;)

Um, Nickwhatastinx, The pilgrims did not go to Jamestown, they landed a bit further up the coast then that and a few years later than that.

That's ok, you're British-Canadian, so I understand that you have a few problems understanding the actual history of this hemisphere ;p


How you doin?


.

[vegasbobby]

1776, delegates from the 13 colonies unanimously issued the Declaration of Independence, which established the United States.

Your only off around 150 years.
Do you any news about US cavemen? And we can hate the US for what they did. .....??????????????????????

[seeandsee]

people are such evil in global look over history

[Nickatilynx]

Originally Posted by sarettah

Um, Nickwhatastinx, The pilgrims did not go to Jamestown, they landed a bit further up the coast then that and a few years later than that.

That's ok, you're British-Canadian, so I understand that you have a few problems understanding the actual history of this hemisphere ;p


How you doin?


.

Very well my old friend , and you.

Also..Re read my post.

This was a merely an additional fact. Not related.



I forgive you cause , you must be nearly as old as Markham , and no one lets him have the remote for the TV.

[Nickatilynx]

Originally Posted by vegasbobby

1776, delegates from the 13 colonies unanimously issued the Declaration of Independence, which established the United States.

Your only off around 150 years.
Do you any news about US cavemen? And we can hate the US for what they did. .....??????????????????????

Yeah those fucking traitorous terrorists!!

;)

[tonyparra]

I love the comments on yahoo always better than the story:

They must have been pretty incompetent as they had an ocean full of fish on one side and a forest full of deer on the other.

[sarettah]

Originally Posted by Nickatilynx

This was a merely an additional fact. Not related.

An additional, unrelated fact thrown in for absolutely no reason. How very British of you

I forgive you cause , you must be nearly as old as Markham , and no one lets him have the remote for the TV.

Me, old ? Seems that I remember that you aren't too very far behind me on that score and the older we get the smaller that gap is ;p


edited in: In retrospect I don't think I am going to be able to forgive that Markhan comment. Markham? Really? You couldn't just stick with Baddog? You had to go full Markham on my ass? I will remember that.

End of fucking edit.


We are doing ok. We are waiting for spring to get here. Thought it was here but now they are saying snow maybe tomorrow so who knows.

.

[sarettah]

Originally Posted by tonyparra

I love the comments on yahoo always better than the story:

They must have been pretty incompetent as they had an ocean full of fish on one side and a forest full of deer on the other.

Yep, if they could have just gotten past those pesky Powhatan Indians that had them surrounded.

.

[DWB]

I hear the Dutch still eat little girls.

[Nickatilynx]

LOL

Same , it appears I left Vancouver for a colder wetter place .

Only got above 20C once this yr so far and rained in a biblical fashion.

And yes, the British have always valued facts , over opinions. ;)


fucker!!! u got me with the fast edit gambit...sob!!!

And ok , the Markham remark was a tad below the belt...I apologise.

[dyna mo]

op, stop posting, you are embarrassing stoners.

[sarettah]

Originally Posted by DWB

I hear the Dutch still eat little girls.

Oh, that is really bad. Funny, but so wrong.

Originally Posted by Nickatilynx

LOL

Same , it appears I left Vancouver for a colder wetter place .

Only got above 20C once this yr so far and rained in a biblical fashion.

And yes, the British have always valued facts , over opinions. ;)


fucker!!! u got me with the fast edit gambit...sob!!!

And ok , the Markham remark was a tad below the belt...I apologise.

You aren't in Vancouver anymore? Why would you leave heaven?

I do not even accept that apology. A comment like that requires cash, large quantities of it, in small unmarked bills.

.

[Nickatilynx]

Originally Posted by sarettah

Oh, that is really bad. Funny, but so wrong.




You aren't in Vancouver anymore? Why would you leave heaven?

I do not even accept that apology. A comment like that requires cash, large quantities of it, in small unmarked bills.

.

LOL

Russ ,add me to skype if you use it.."nickatilynx".

Then we can liase where I send the $$$$ bills or a transit van full of pikeys...difficult choice... hmm ;)

[sarettah]

Originally Posted by Nickatilynx

LOL

Russ ,add me to skype if you use it.."nickatilynx".

Then we can liase where I send the $$$$ bills or a transit van full of pikeys...difficult choice... hmm ;)

Skype? Like L-Pink says, $25.00 for 10 minutes and I need payment up front. Just so you know, that is quite a discount over what I give Serge.

.

[dyna mo]

Originally Posted by Nickatilynx

This a better fact not taught in the US.

That the pilgrims did not come to america seeking freedom. They came to America to build a theocracy...no political nor religious dissent was tolerated.

They actually came for the exact opposite reason.

;)

In "Democracy in America," Alexis de Tocqueville noted:

"Puritanism was not merely a religious doctrine, but corresponded in many points with the most absolute democratic and republican theories. It was this tendency that had aroused its most dangerous adversaries. Persecuted by the government of the mother country, and disgusted by the habits of a society which the rigor of their own principles condemned,
the Puritans went forth to seek some rude and unfrequented part of the world where they could live according to their own opinions and worship God in freedom."

....The general principles which are the groundwork of modern constitutions, principles which, in the seventeenth century, were imperfectly known in Europe, and not completely triumphant even in Great Britain, were all recognized and established by the laws of New England: the intervention of the people in public affairs, the free voting of taxes, the responsibility of the agents of power, personal liberty, and trial by jury were all positively established without discussion."

When James I succeeded Queen Elizabeth in 1603 he brought from his native Scotland an antipathy for Presbyterianism and vowed to suppress Puritanism in England. He also brought his Stuart family's insistence upon the divine right of kings and loathing of "interference" by Parliament.

His harassment of Puritans led some of them to flee to Holland, whence came in 1620 the founders of the Plymouth colony in Massachusetts.

[TheSquealer]

It's a bit odd that no one picked up on the OP's drug addled assumption that cannibalism meant "killing" the girl in order to eat her. Jamestown was rife in that year with disease and the local natives basically had them on lock down and they couldn't venture out of the fort.

Most of them died of starvation and disease and towards the end, some ate the remains of others as well as rats, shoe leather etc.

[dyna mo]

Originally Posted by TheSquealer

It's a bit odd that no one picked up on the OP's drug addled assumption that cannibalism meant "killing" the girl in order to eat her. Jamestown was rife in that year with disease and the local natives basically had them on lock down and they couldn't venture out of the fort.

Most of them died of starvation and disease and towards the end, some ate the remains of others as well as rats, shoe leather etc.

i did, what's the point of pointing that out though? it's only in the 2nd paragraph of the article, the op didn't get that far.

Facing a period of starvation in the winter of 1609-1610 when about 80 percent of the colonists died, some apparently tried to dig into the brain of a child who had already died, said anthropologists at the Smithsonian National Museum of Natural History.

[TheSquealer]

Originally Posted by Nickatilynx

This a better fact not taught in the US.

That the pilgrims did not come to america seeking freedom. They came to America to build a theocracy...no political nor religious dissent was tolerated.

They actually came for the exact opposite reason.

;)

Of course its taught in schools. It was a small religious sect that came to practice their religion as they wished. They chose to settle in an isolated area and build their own community based on their faith. Everyone understands that. They were not the first settlers and did not discover America. They were just one group that came over.... over a century after others.

[dyna mo]

[sarettah]

Originally Posted by TheSquealer

It's a bit odd that no one picked up on the OP's drug addled assumption that cannibalism meant "killing" the girl in order to eat her. Jamestown was rife in that year with disease and the local natives basically had them on lock down and they couldn't venture out of the fort.

Most of them died of starvation and disease and towards the end, some ate the remains of others as well as rats, shoe leather etc.

I think mostof us picked it up. I had read an article on it earlier today so I knew he was playing loose with the story. I think we kind of thought that it was probably quite on purpose and we were just joining in the fun.

I think.


Maybe.



Could be ;p

.

[sperbonzo]

Originally Posted by Nickatilynx

Mike, therefore so Washington et al were British... so they were, omfg..fucking terorists!!! ;)

This a better fact not taught in the US.



;)

Of course they were all considered rebels at the time. ((terrorism really refers to random attacks on civilians in order to spread "terror".... Kind of like the RAF night bombings in WWII.... ;) )

Anyway, Washington, et al, were absolutely British subjects and therefore considered full-on traitors, and rebels at the time. In fact, only about 25% of British colonials really backed the move to overthrow the rule of the crown. That's what cracks me up about people that are so anti-succession of states these days.... I always say, "so then why are you celebrating the 4th of July?"





.

[Badmaash]

Originally Posted by sarettah

I think mostof us picked it up. I had read an article on it earlier today so I knew he was playing loose with the story. I think we kind of thought that it was probably quite on purpose and we were just joining in the fun.

I think.


Maybe.



Could be ;p

.

Are you high or something?

[Nickatilynx]

Originally Posted by sperbonzo

Of course they were all considered rebels at the time. ((terrorism really refers to random attacks on civilians in order to spread "terror".... Kind of like the RAF night bombings in WWII.... ;) )

Anyway, Washington, et al, were absolutely British subjects and therefore considered full-on traitors, and rebels at the time. In fact, only about 25% of British colonials really backed the move to overthrow the rule of the crown. That's what cracks me up about people that are so anti-succession of states these days.... I always say, "so then why are you celebrating the 4th of July?"





.

;)

I know you knew that I knew that you knew ;)

just killing time waiting on things

[sarettah]

Originally Posted by Badmaash

Are you high or something?

Are you looking at me through my laptop cam or something? Fucking stalker is what you are dammit. There, I put masking tape over the camera that will stop you.

Did you ever notice how sticky masking tape is? Gets all sorts of stuck to the fingers, ya know?

.

[sarettah]

Originally Posted by Nickatilynx

;)

I know you knew that I knew that you knew ;)

just killing time waiting on things

I had no idea that you knew that you knew that he knew until you said that you knew that you knew that he knew so it is a nice thing to know that you knew, ya know?

.

[96ukssob]

You can't tell me you wouldnt do the same if it meant life or death..

[baddog]

Originally Posted by TheSquealer

It's a bit odd that no one picked up on the OP's drug addled assumption that cannibalism meant "killing" the girl in order to eat her. Jamestown was rife in that year with disease and the local natives basically had them on lock down and they couldn't venture out of the fort.

Most of them died of starvation and disease and towards the end, some ate the remains of others as well as rats, shoe leather etc.

That is far too much information for most to understand.