Texas republicans Voted Against Sandy Relief, But They Want Federal Aid For Explosion - GoFuckYourself.com

SuckOnThis · 04-21-2013, 06:59 AM

A pair of Republican lawmakers who voted against federal aid in the aftermath of Hurricane Sandy are now looking for federal aid in the wake of the deadly explosion in West, Texas.

Texas Sen. Ted Cruz lambasted the Sandy Aid package, voting against the measure in January. Cruz issued a statement explaining that he voted against the aid because it included a number of spending measures that were not related to disaster relief, including "Smithsonian repairs, upgrades to National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration airplanes, and more funding for Head Start."

However, in Washington Thursday, Cruz said that he was "working to ensure that all available resources are marshaled to deal with the horrific loss of life and suffering that we've seen" after an explosion at a fertilizer plant in Texas leveled the plant and nearby houses and business, claiming the lives of at least a dozen people and injuring hundreds more.

FEMA has reportedly been in close contact with officials in Texas to organize aid, relief and support to the West area.

Rep. Bill Flores, who represents West, also voted against the Sandy relief package but is now requesting federal aid for the disaster in his home district. Flores said Thursday that members of Congress with whom he has been in touch have pledged assistance.

After Flores voted against the Sandy aid package, he justified his vote by saying the package was "too large" and did "more than meet the immediate needs of Sandy victims."

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/0...n_3117356.html

bronco67 · 04-21-2013, 07:32 AM

He voted against the Sandy bill because there was some extra funding for head start, which basically helps low-income children...we know all we need to know about this fucking fool.

L-Pink · 04-21-2013, 07:45 AM

Typical, congress is not capable of honestly dealing with any issue without adding non related items to the bill.

Relentless · 04-21-2013, 08:29 AM

Unfunded aid packages are moronic.

We ought to have a 100 Billion dollar fund for natural disasters and calamities.
Instead we have 0 set aside and vote for unfunded assistance when needed.
Nobody with a brain runs a household or a business that way, and governments ought to follow that example

arock10 · 04-21-2013, 09:22 AM

Big surprise

tony286 · 04-21-2013, 09:29 AM

Because they are hypocrites

04-21-2013, 06:59 AM	#1
SuckOnThis So Fucking Banned Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: In my head Posts: 6,844	Texas republicans Voted Against Sandy Relief, But They Want Federal Aid For Explosion A pair of Republican lawmakers who voted against federal aid in the aftermath of Hurricane Sandy are now looking for federal aid in the wake of the deadly explosion in West, Texas. Texas Sen. Ted Cruz lambasted the Sandy Aid package, voting against the measure in January. Cruz issued a statement explaining that he voted against the aid because it included a number of spending measures that were not related to disaster relief, including "Smithsonian repairs, upgrades to National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration airplanes, and more funding for Head Start." However, in Washington Thursday, Cruz said that he was "working to ensure that all available resources are marshaled to deal with the horrific loss of life and suffering that we've seen" after an explosion at a fertilizer plant in Texas leveled the plant and nearby houses and business, claiming the lives of at least a dozen people and injuring hundreds more. FEMA has reportedly been in close contact with officials in Texas to organize aid, relief and support to the West area. Rep. Bill Flores, who represents West, also voted against the Sandy relief package but is now requesting federal aid for the disaster in his home district. Flores said Thursday that members of Congress with whom he has been in touch have pledged assistance. After Flores voted against the Sandy aid package, he justified his vote by saying the package was "too large" and did "more than meet the immediate needs of Sandy victims." http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/0...n_3117356.html Last edited by SuckOnThis; 04-21-2013 at 07:06 AM..

04-21-2013, 07:32 AM	#2
bronco67 Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Dec 2006 Posts: 29,035	He voted against the Sandy bill because there was some extra funding for head start, which basically helps low-income children...we know all we need to know about this fucking fool. __________________

04-21-2013, 08:29 AM	#4
Relentless www.EngineFood.com Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2006 Posts: 5,698	Unfunded aid packages are moronic. We ought to have a 100 Billion dollar fund for natural disasters and calamities. Instead we have 0 set aside and vote for unfunded assistance when needed. Nobody with a brain runs a household or a business that way, and governments ought to follow that example __________________ Website Secure \| Engine Food ICQ# 266-942-896

04-21-2013, 09:22 AM	#5
arock10 Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2006 Posts: 6,218	Big surprise __________________ Sup

04-21-2013, 07:45 AM	#3
L-Pink working on my tan Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Florida/Kentucky Posts: 39,152	Typical, congress is not capable of honestly dealing with any issue without adding non related items to the bill.

04-21-2013, 09:29 AM	#6
tony286 lurker Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: atlanta Posts: 57,021	Because they are hypocrites