$634 million to build the Obamacare website. - GoFuckYourself.com

onwebcam · 10-10-2013, 08:29 AM

We paid $634 million for the Obamacare sites and all we got was this lousy 404

http://www.digitaltrends.com/opinion...-website-cost/

Harmon · 10-10-2013, 08:31 AM

Seems like a bargain considering a soft toilet seat cover for the president's ashy ass is right around a billion (no TP included)

L-Pink · 10-10-2013, 08:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Harmon

Seems like a bargain considering a soft toilet seat cover for the president's ashy ass is right around a billion (no TP included)

I'll bet it's heated. That's one of the 3 requirements to make him happy.

(let's see how many get that Earl Butz reference)

Manfap · 10-10-2013, 08:37 AM

Should have asked manwin to build it.

gracesfall · 10-10-2013, 08:40 AM

Holy FUCK! What's it supposed to do? Give you a blowjob while you fill out the forms? Man, I am working in the WRONG sector.

epitome · 10-10-2013, 08:40 AM

Thanks, Rick Perry, Rick Scott and other Republican governors!

freecartoonporn · 10-10-2013, 08:41 AM

just wow....

Fat Panda · 10-10-2013, 08:46 AM

just another radical right wing fascist redistribution of wealth from the people and future generations to plutocrats and corporations

happens everyday. no news here

Rochard · 10-10-2013, 09:13 AM

Amazing. Seems it went up $134 million dollars.... Over night.

Yesterday it was only $500 million dollars.

NinjaSteve · 10-10-2013, 09:17 AM

They should give some insurance away. Damn!

onwebcam · 10-10-2013, 09:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard

Amazing. Seems it went up $134 million dollars.... Over night.

Yesterday it was only $500 million dollars.

Considering it still doesn't work I'm quite sure the figure will be in the billions shortly.

http://usaspending.gov/explore?tab=B...=detailsummary

Creatine · 10-10-2013, 09:53 AM

Looks like they just set up wordpress.

The developer must be getting paid 100 million an hour.

Barry-xlovecam · 10-10-2013, 10:10 AM

Just think -- you could of gotten a government contract and made bank ...

gracesfall · 10-10-2013, 10:28 AM

Think of how many people could have been insured for what it cost to build that clusterfuck of a website.

Rochard · 10-10-2013, 10:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by onwebcam

Considering it still doesn't work I'm quite sure the figure will be in the billions shortly.

http://usaspending.gov/explore?tab=B...=detailsummary

It's just not adding up.

The page lists how much money was spent "for the Obamacare website", but it doesn't say what it was for. It gives a grand total of $634 million, but this seems to be made up of 114 contracts, and 379 sub contracts. Going over the list I see contracts for such items as "telecommunications" in the $17 million dollar range.

Going into further detail, scroll down on that page, and it's broken down by the five most expensive items:

Adpe System Configuration
Other ADP & Telecommunications Svcs
It and Telecom- Other It and Telecommunications
Other Professional Services
It and Telecom- Systems Development

Going yet even further, it details the companies involved:

Groupe Cgi Inc
Carahsoft Technology Corporation
Everware-Cbdi North America, INC.

This is not one contract for one project or one website. This is 114 contracts and 379 sub contracts done the Department of Health and Services Department over a five year period. And most likely only a portion of it is related to Obamacare.

Rochard · 10-10-2013, 10:35 AM

here's the kicker..... Go to http://usaspending.gov/trends and take a look at how many departments the US government has then take a spin around and see what they spend.

Fucking staggering.

AsianDivaGirlsWebDude · 10-10-2013, 10:52 AM

Quote:

Here's a Map of the Countries That Provide Universal Health Care (America's Still Not on It)

ADG

iSpyCams · 10-10-2013, 10:55 AM

They shoulda talked to me, I could easily have gotten them a 5% discount.

onwebcam · 10-10-2013, 11:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard

It's just not adding up.

The page lists how much money was spent "for the Obamacare website", but it doesn't say what it was for. It gives a grand total of $634 million, but this seems to be made up of 114 contracts, and 379 sub contracts. Going over the list I see contracts for such items as "telecommunications" in the $17 million dollar range.

Going into further detail, scroll down on that page, and it's broken down by the five most expensive items:

Adpe System Configuration
Other ADP & Telecommunications Svcs
It and Telecom- Other It and Telecommunications
Other Professional Services
It and Telecom- Systems Development

Going yet even further, it details the companies involved:

Groupe Cgi Inc
Carahsoft Technology Corporation
Everware-Cbdi North America, INC.

This is not one contract for one project or one website. This is 114 contracts and 379 sub contracts done the Department of Health and Services Department over a five year period. And most likely only a portion of it is related to Obamacare.

The search is by contract number. So everything related to that contract is tied to it. You can tell "cgi federal" setup multiple "companies" just by looking at some of the names. So CGI Federal calls up his buddy in Washington and says "Hey I can't figure out how to run wordpress so we need to contract this out to someone else." Buddy in Washington makes another request for bids and CGI federal sets up another dummy corp to bid and win the other contract.

SuckOnThis · 10-10-2013, 11:05 AM

Geocities, a day late and a dollar short.

O MARINA · 10-10-2013, 11:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by onwebcam

We paid $634 million for the Obamacare sites and all we got was this lousy 404

Should have used oDesk.

Barry-xlovecam · 10-10-2013, 11:16 AM

Quote:

Here's a Map of the Countries That Provide Universal Health Care (America's Still Not on It) ^^^

That is a real embarrassment for one of the richest nations in the world.

Colmike9 · 10-10-2013, 11:19 AM

Which GFYer scammed the government?..

Rochard · 10-10-2013, 11:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by onwebcam

The search is by contract number.

It is not a search by contract number, but instead is a search by "prime awardee". And it's not one "awardee", and it's not for one contract or even one project, but instead hundreds of contracts and projects.

On the right hand side it's broken down by project number and amount. For example, the most expensive contract in the past five years is HHSM500T0012, which is only $58 million for "Adpe System Configuration". That's a far cry from $600 million.

Another quick serach tells me that "Adpe System Configuration" really stands for Automatic Data Processing and Equipment, which doesn't even tell us what it's for.

Again, you taking the total amount spent on contracts by the US Health & Services Department (whatever the name is) and saying it's all for Obamacare, when the truth is it's for nearly 500 different items.

This is more bullshit like the death panels.

L-Pink · 10-10-2013, 11:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard

And most likely only a portion of it is related to Obamacare.

Nope ??...

brassmonkey · 10-10-2013, 11:24 AM

something had to replace snake oil!

the government has no shame.

DWB · 10-10-2013, 12:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Manfap

Should have asked manwin to build it.

They did.

baddog · 10-10-2013, 12:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by L-Pink

I'll bet it's heated. That's one of the 3 requirements to make him happy.

(let's see how many get that Earl Butz reference)

I did.

Quote:

Originally Posted by epitome

Thanks, Rick Perry, Rick Scott and other Republican governors!

How so?

dyna mo · 10-10-2013, 12:14 PM

fox news claims it's a much more reasonable $93million

http://www.foxnews.com/tech/2013/10/...-experts-warn/

Rochard · 10-10-2013, 12:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by L-Pink

Nope ??...

So you are saying that 114 contracts and 379 sub contracts were awarded by the Department of Health and Human Services over the past five years and ALL of them are to put up a single website?

According this website, in 2009 $63 million was spent in 2009. Obamacare didn't become a law until 2010.

This data is about hundreds of contacts over a five year period for the Health and Human Services department, not one project to build one website.

seeandsee · 10-10-2013, 12:21 PM

super duper site, wtf is cost so much money??? lollllllllll

crockett · 10-10-2013, 01:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gracesfall

Think of how many people could have been insured for what it cost to build that clusterfuck of a website.

Think of how many could have been insured with the 300 million a day that our country is losing due to the shutdown. At 2 weeks that's roughly 2.4 billion pissed down the drain.. Where oh where are the so called fiscal republicans whom should be pissed off about govt waste?

At least once they get the website working properly it will be a benefit to Americans.. Meanwhile the 300 mil a day is just pissed down the drain due to a needless shutdown.

Rochard · 10-10-2013, 01:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo

fox news claims it's a much more reasonable $93million

http://www.foxnews.com/tech/2013/10/...-experts-warn/

Possible.... But still a fucking huge amount of money to spend.

But if you think about it, what exactly did that money buy? A website? Or a website backed up by a secure data facility networked in directly to the IRS and every hospital and doctor in the country that is accessable to everyone in the US?

I'm not trying to justify the cost.... But it's a little bit more than a website hooked up to a database.

epitome · 10-10-2013, 01:17 PM

You do realize that the site was only needed in the first place because of states such as your rejecting the law of the land? So you only wasted your own money. Oh wait, no you didn't, because your state takes out way more federal dollars than it puts in.

epitome · 10-10-2013, 01:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard

Possible.... But still a fucking huge amount of money to spend.

But if you think about it, what exactly did that money buy? A website? Or a website backed up by a secure data facility networked in directly to the IRS and every hospital and doctor in the country that is accessable to everyone in the US?

I'm not trying to justify the cost.... But it's a little bit more than a website hooked up to a database.

This. It's not a website, but instead a system. People like the OP will never admit that though. Nor will they check the very links that they use as proof to see that the contracts they're citing to add up to that number go back before Obama was even President. They'll also never admit that their sources don't actually specify which contract was for what.

dyna mo · 10-10-2013, 01:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard

Possible.... But still a fucking huge amount of money to spend.

But if you think about it, what exactly did that money buy? A website? Or a website backed up by a secure data facility networked in directly to the IRS and every hospital and doctor in the country that is accessable to everyone in the US?

I'm not trying to justify the cost.... But it's a little bit more than a website hooked up to a database.

there is no where near that level of functionality in the site/operation. it's not linked to a single hospital or doctor and requires a 3rd party background check via credit reports.

there are extremely sophisticated websites in the private sector that involve massive functionality, i would be shocked if those sites cost even $10m, let alone $90m, $600m is silly.

even if the backend systems were not built, 10s of millions of $ for a website is insane.

mineistaken · 10-10-2013, 01:46 PM

nice money laundry

epitome · 10-10-2013, 01:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo

there is no where near that level of functionality in the site/operation. it's not linked to a single hospital or doctor and requires a 3rd party background check via credit reports.

there are extremely sophisticated websites in the private sector that involve massive functionality, i would be shocked if those sites cost even $10m, let alone $90m, $600m is silly.

even if the backend systems were not built, 10s of millions of $ for a website is insane.

I doubt the real number has been put out anywhere. The only people (including media outlets) citing it have a clear agenda against ObamaCare and will try to make it look bad at any cost.

Those that are for it aren't trying to discredit it and therefore aren't looking for trivial things. It's weird how reckless spending happens every day and nobody cares, but I can't turn a corner on the Internet in the last 24 hours without seeing a new thing about the cost of this website. All with different numbers, mind you.

I hope the people adding up the number aren't relying on the link cited in the article from the OP. That link only specifies dollars amount and agencies and not the actual RFPs. Plus the contracts go back to before Obama was even President -- and ObamaCare existed -- but still somehow ended up in the total.

Juicy D. Links · 10-10-2013, 02:02 PM

fitzmulti · 10-10-2013, 02:10 PM

Vendzilla · 10-10-2013, 02:55 PM

How many people would that 634 million insure?
At $500 a month, that's $6,000 a year
or over 105,000 people for a year.

Rochard · 10-10-2013, 03:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo

there is no where near that level of functionality in the site/operation. it's not linked to a single hospital or doctor and requires a 3rd party background check via credit reports.

there are extremely sophisticated websites in the private sector that involve massive functionality, i would be shocked if those sites cost even $10m, let alone $90m, $600m is silly.

even if the backend systems were not built, 10s of millions of $ for a website is insane.

You keep looking at it like it's a website. It's not.

The health department was tasked with coming up with an entirely new system based on a new law which had to be compatible with multiple US government systems, every healthcare provider in the US, every hospital and every doctor's office, AND every citizen in the US. (Don't tell me it doesn't; Every doctor has to talk to every hospital and every healthcare provide who has to talk to the US government... My wife's office not only had to upgrade all of their computers, as did their healthcare provider.)

But before they wrote a single piece of html code, before they even had a discussion about protocols, they had to have a long legal discussion... Every state has strict laws about how to handle healthcare information, and all of them are different - so before anything was done they had to figure out how to legally work it. And everyone involved that discussion had to have background checks (you already how that shit works), hundreds or even thousands of people flying around to meetings with different state attorney's offices, healthcare providers, flights, meals, hotels... All before a single bit code was written.

Yeah, I can see $90 million in a heartbeat.

dyna mo · 10-10-2013, 03:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by epitome

I doubt the real number has been put out anywhere. The only people (including media outlets) citing it have a clear agenda against ObamaCare and will try to make it look bad at any cost.

Those that are for it aren't trying to discredit it and therefore aren't looking for trivial things. It's weird how reckless spending happens every day and nobody cares, but I can't turn a corner on the Internet in the last 24 hours without seeing a new thing about the cost of this website. All with different numbers, mind you.

I hope the people adding up the number aren't relying on the link cited in the article from the OP. That link only specifies dollars amount and agencies and not the actual RFPs. Plus the contracts go back to before Obama was even President -- and ObamaCare existed -- but still somehow ended up in the total.

i would wager that the real # is still obscene. has nothgin to do with obama. it's too bad the news sources choose to overstate/guestimate the #s for a story on the # rather than actually try and find the fucking #.

nevertheless, could you imagine if for-profit/private business had to pay whatever it cost the government to create that site for their own/our own sites? fuuuuuuuuck. right.

dyna mo · 10-10-2013, 03:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard

You keep looking at it like it's a website. It's not.

The health department was tasked with coming up with an entirely new system based on a new law which had to be compatible with multiple US government systems, every healthcare provider in the US, every hospital and every doctor's office, AND every citizen in the US. (Don't tell me it doesn't; Every doctor has to talk to every hospital and every healthcare provide who has to talk to the US government... My wife's office not only had to upgrade all of their computers, as did their healthcare provider.)

But before they wrote a single piece of html code, before they even had a discussion about protocols, they had to have a long legal discussion... Every state has strict laws about how to handle healthcare information, and all of them are different - so before anything was done they had to figure out how to legally work it. And everyone involved that discussion had to have background checks (you already how that shit works), hundreds or even thousands of people flying around to meetings with different state attorney's offices, healthcare providers, flights, meals, hotels... All before a single bit code was written.

Yeah, I can see $90 million in a heartbeat.

no i'm not. i'm looking at it like it provides a function.

and now you're just making shit up like you were in the room.

dyna mo · 10-10-2013, 03:50 PM

if you want to see very similar functionality- state based search of health insurance based on individual profiles, just surf www.ehealthinsurance.com

i've stepped-through the cal state exchange, and i've bought at the site above, they're similar. the gov site does more by validitating yrou identity via your credit report( calling a 3rd party is no biggie to code) and also determining your eligibility based on the income you input, again, no biggie, many gov sites do that already.

wehi allow focused geo-based searches and also doctor's searches, i.e, I can input my doctor's name and see all of the plans available he accepts.

i doubt ehi paid 10s of millions for their operation

epitome · 10-10-2013, 03:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo

i would wager that the real # is still obscene. has nothgin to do with obama. it's too bad the news sources choose to overstate/guestimate the #s for a story on the # rather than actually try and find the fucking #.

nevertheless, could you imagine if for-profit/private business had to pay whatever it cost the government to create that site for their own/our own sites? fuuuuuuuuck. right.

I bet it is obscene, too. All government contracts are loaded with wasted dollars.

We're also a little jaded though. I have a friend that owns a web development firm and ten years ago it was ridiculous what he'd get paid $20k for. For $20k he'd be expected to do the same site that someone in adult could have done for $2k. These days he's struggling because people can get the same with a $60 modded WordPress template.

Edit: a fully and tightly integrated solution, even tied into the old mainframe legacy systems the government still uses shouldn't cost more than $500k to a million, I'd think. And at that price the contractor should still be able to turn a nice profit.

Rochard · 10-10-2013, 03:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo

no i'm not. i'm looking at it like it provides a function.

and now you're just making shit up like you were in the room.

But you keep saying "it's a website". But you fail to look at the road to get there.

Just giving thought to how to legally handle this data multiplied times laws in fifty states is a logistical nightmare, no less how to make it all work with ALL of the healthcare providers.

I once worked on a year long IT project that only had to talk to one DB. It was two months of just planning it out on a white board.

epitome · 10-10-2013, 03:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard

You keep looking at it like it's a website. It's not.

The health department was tasked with coming up with an entirely new system based on a new law which had to be compatible with multiple US government systems, every healthcare provider in the US, every hospital and every doctor's office, AND every citizen in the US. (Don't tell me it doesn't; Every doctor has to talk to every hospital and every healthcare provide who has to talk to the US government... My wife's office not only had to upgrade all of their computers, as did their healthcare provider.)

But before they wrote a single piece of html code, before they even had a discussion about protocols, they had to have a long legal discussion... Every state has strict laws about how to handle healthcare information, and all of them are different - so before anything was done they had to figure out how to legally work it. And everyone involved that discussion had to have background checks (you already how that shit works), hundreds or even thousands of people flying around to meetings with different state attorney's offices, healthcare providers, flights, meals, hotels... All before a single bit code was written.

Yeah, I can see $90 million in a heartbeat.

What are you even talking about here? No doctors have had to upgrade their software. Doctors were, however, offered up to $40k when switching to a EMR/PMS if they attested to passing all of the stages of meaningful use, which most solution providers guarantee as a part of your purchase.

Edit: And HL7 is what allows medical applications to talk to each other. That has already existed for years.

Double Edit: HIPAA already covers all privacy laws and is also already as strict as it gets, so nobody was flying around for meetings with SAOs.

adendreams · 10-10-2013, 04:03 PM

are any of you whiners going to apologize or feel any shame when the ACA is just as entrenched and popular as social security and medicaid in a few years...

no you'll probably just move on to bitching and talking shit about something else thats positive for society.

fucking cry babies

dyna mo · 10-10-2013, 04:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard

But you keep saying "it's a website". But you fail to look at the road to get there.

Just giving thought to how to legally handle this data multiplied times laws in fifty states is a logistical nightmare, no less how to make it all work with ALL of the healthcare providers.

I once worked on a year long IT project that only had to talk to one DB. It was two months of just planning it out on a white board.

it is a website rochard. just because it provides a service via functionality doesn't make it not a website.

but i couldn't care less what you want us all to call it, fill me in though, what do you want us to call it? an operation?

legal schmegal, ehealthinsurance does all that nonsense.

it's neat you worked on a year long it project, that has nothing to do with anything, else i would post a partial resume and we would have this very cleared up.

10-10-2013, 08:29 AM	#1
onwebcam Fake Nick 1.0 Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Rent free, your head Posts: 27,670	$634 million to build the Obamacare website. We paid $634 million for the Obamacare sites and all we got was this lousy 404 http://www.digitaltrends.com/opinion...-website-cost/ __________________ PLEASE WAIT WHILE BIDEN ADMIN UNINSTALLS ITSELF..... ██████████████████▒ 99.5% complete.

10-10-2013, 08:40 AM	#5
gracesfall Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2013 Location: Florida Posts: 252	Holy FUCK! What's it supposed to do? Give you a blowjob while you fill out the forms? Man, I am working in the WRONG sector. __________________ -= gracesfall =- FreeLesbianPornBlog.com Follow me on Twitter: https://twitter.com/gracesfall Like me on Facebook: Free Lesbian Porn Blog Hit me up on ICQ: 663050376 Domains for Sale: DaddyWhoreBucks.com \| YoungAndFuckable.com \| KnobGobblers.com

10-10-2013, 08:41 AM	#7
freecartoonporn Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2012 Location: NC Posts: 7,683	just wow.... __________________ SSD Cloud Server, VPS Server, Simple Cloud Hosting \| DigitalOcean

10-10-2013, 09:13 AM	#9
Rochard Jägermeister Test Pilot Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: NORCAL Posts: 73,967	Amazing. Seems it went up $134 million dollars.... Over night. Yesterday it was only $500 million dollars. __________________ “The choice is no longer between right or left. The choice is between normal and crazy.” - Sarah Huckabee Sanders YNOT MAIL \| THE BEST ADULT MAILING SOLUTION

10-10-2013, 09:17 AM	#10
NinjaSteve Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2003 Posts: 11,089	They should give some insurance away. Damn! __________________ ...

10-10-2013, 08:31 AM	#2
Harmon ( ͡ʘ╭͜ʖ╮͡ʘ) Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2004 Posts: 20,010	Seems like a bargain considering a soft toilet seat cover for the president's ashy ass is right around a billion (no TP included)

10-10-2013, 08:37 AM	#4
Manfap Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2013 Posts: 2,623	Should have asked manwin to build it.

10-10-2013, 08:40 AM	#6
epitome So Fucking Lame Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: St. Petersburg, FL Posts: 12,156	Thanks, Rick Perry, Rick Scott and other Republican governors!

10-10-2013, 08:46 AM	#8
Fat Panda Porn is Dead. Move along. Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2006 Posts: 13,295	just another radical right wing fascist redistribution of wealth from the people and future generations to plutocrats and corporations happens everyday. no news here

10-10-2013, 09:53 AM	#12
Creatine Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2013 Posts: 1,060	Looks like they just set up wordpress. The developer must be getting paid 100 million an hour.

10-10-2013, 10:10 AM	#13
Barry-xlovecam It's 42 Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2010 Location: Global Posts: 18,083	Just think -- you could of gotten a government contract and made bank ...

10-10-2013, 10:28 AM	#14
gracesfall Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2013 Location: Florida Posts: 252	Think of how many people could have been insured for what it cost to build that clusterfuck of a website. __________________ -= gracesfall =- FreeLesbianPornBlog.com Follow me on Twitter: https://twitter.com/gracesfall Like me on Facebook: Free Lesbian Porn Blog Hit me up on ICQ: 663050376 Domains for Sale: DaddyWhoreBucks.com \| YoungAndFuckable.com \| KnobGobblers.com

10-10-2013, 10:35 AM	#16
Rochard Jägermeister Test Pilot Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: NORCAL Posts: 73,967	here's the kicker..... Go to http://usaspending.gov/trends and take a look at how many departments the US government has then take a spin around and see what they spend. Fucking staggering. __________________ “The choice is no longer between right or left. The choice is between normal and crazy.” - Sarah Huckabee Sanders YNOT MAIL \| THE BEST ADULT MAILING SOLUTION

10-10-2013, 10:55 AM	#18
iSpyCams Amateur Gynecologist Industry Role: Join Date: May 2009 Location: Medellin Posts: 4,436	They shoulda talked to me, I could easily have gotten them a 5% discount. __________________ - As soon as I think up a good sig it's going here.

10-10-2013, 11:05 AM	#20
SuckOnThis So Fucking Banned Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: In my head Posts: 6,844	Geocities, a day late and a dollar short.

10-10-2013, 11:19 AM	#23
Colmike9 (>^_^)b Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2011 Posts: 7,224	Which GFYer scammed the government?.. __________________ Join the BEST cam affiliate program on the internet! I've referred over $1.7mil in spending this past year, you should join in. I make a lot more money in the medical field in a lab now, fuck you guys. Don't ask me to come back, but do join Chaturbate in my sig, it still makes bank without me touching shit for years..

10-10-2013, 11:24 AM	#26
brassmonkey Pay It Forward Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Yo Mama House Posts: 77,229	something had to replace snake oil! the government has no shame. __________________ TRUMP 2025 KEKAW!!! - The Laken Riley Act Is Law! DACA ENDED - SUPPORT AZ HCR 2060 52R - email: brassballz-at-techie.com

10-10-2013, 12:14 PM	#29
dyna mo The People's Post Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: invisible 7-11 Posts: 65,347	fox news claims it's a much more reasonable $93million http://www.foxnews.com/tech/2013/10/...-experts-warn/

10-10-2013, 12:21 PM	#31
seeandsee Check SIG! Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Europe (Skype: gojkoas) Posts: 50,945	super duper site, wtf is cost so much money??? lollllllllll __________________ BUY MY SIG - 50$/Year Contact here

10-10-2013, 01:17 PM	#34
epitome So Fucking Lame Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: St. Petersburg, FL Posts: 12,156	You do realize that the site was only needed in the first place because of states such as your rejecting the law of the land? So you only wasted your own money. Oh wait, no you didn't, because your state takes out way more federal dollars than it puts in.

10-10-2013, 01:46 PM	#37
mineistaken See signature :) Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: ICQ 363 097 773 Posts: 29,656	nice money laundry

10-10-2013, 02:02 PM	#39
Juicy D. Links So Fucking Banned Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: N.Y. -Long Island -- Posts: 122,992

10-10-2013, 02:10 PM	#40
fitzmulti I Like Depth Of Field! Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: Las Vegas, NV, USA: 36.12318 N, 115.090219 W Posts: 14,861	__________________ www.SexyGirlsCash.com CONTACT // FITZMULTI AT GMAIL.COM // {Please include a message so I know you are from GFY! I get too many spam "add requests"!}

10-10-2013, 02:55 PM	#41
Vendzilla Biker Gnome Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: cell#324 Posts: 23,200	How many people would that 634 million insure? At $500 a month, that's $6,000 a year or over 105,000 people for a year. __________________ Webair died? Carbon is not the problem, it makes up 0.041% of our atmosphere , 95% of that is from Volcanos and decomposing plants and stuff. So people in the US are responsible for 13% of the carbon in the atmosphere which 95% is not from Humans, like cars and trucks and stuff and they want to spend trillions to fix it while Solar Panel plants are powered by coal plants think about that

10-10-2013, 03:50 PM	#45
dyna mo The People's Post Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: invisible 7-11 Posts: 65,347	if you want to see very similar functionality- state based search of health insurance based on individual profiles, just surf www.ehealthinsurance.com i've stepped-through the cal state exchange, and i've bought at the site above, they're similar. the gov site does more by validitating yrou identity via your credit report( calling a 3rd party is no biggie to code) and also determining your eligibility based on the income you input, again, no biggie, many gov sites do that already. wehi allow focused geo-based searches and also doctor's searches, i.e, I can input my doctor's name and see all of the plans available he accepts. i doubt ehi paid 10s of millions for their operation

10-10-2013, 04:03 PM	#49
adendreams Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: LA and Florida Posts: 1,887	are any of you whiners going to apologize or feel any shame when the ACA is just as entrenched and popular as social security and medicaid in a few years... no you'll probably just move on to bitching and talking shit about something else thats positive for society. fucking cry babies __________________ Aden - Your Content Shooter Superfreak ADEN CONTENT · HD Video · Ex-GF · Am Content · Pro Content · PHP Programming · Package Deals • Skype or ICQ available on request •