JuicyAds selling spots to piracy blogs?

[PMProducoes]

Unfourtanely, I got this email the other day...
Twistys, ATK, Babes, Suicide Girls, Playboy, Action Girls, Aziani and others are listed.

JuicyAds has just sold one of your advertisments:
MyDomain - daily updated free galleries
ZoneID: 696969
Price: $0.69 / 69 days

The ad has already been placed on your website:

http://fullpornsets.com

Hasn't JuicyAds a team to hunt and take this sites out of their network?
I can work for them.

[Markul]

This isn't really JuicyAds the support forum ya know, maybe send them an e-mail - they usually take that stuff down when they notice.

I don't think any ad network has the manpower to manually go over every website and then go over them the next day in case they choose to join the dark side and if they are ok the next day, then go over them the day after..... see where this is going?

Here: http://www.juicyads.com/contact.php

[PMProducoes]

I know that this isn't the JuicyAds support forum and that there is a contact form.
I understand your point of view.

A simple message to them, would, at the very best, take down fullpornsets.com from their network.
Making this public might improve their approving/crawl system to avoid this kind of blogs/boards/forums on their network.

According to web.archive, fullpornsets.com has been on the dark side for a long time.
http://web.archive.org/web/*/http://fullpornsets.com

It's not our job to make their job.

[Ace of Spades]

Originally Posted by PMProducoes

I know that this isn't the JuicyAds support forum and that there is a contact form.
I understand your point of view.

A simple message to them, would, at the very best, take down fullpornsets.com from their network.
Making this public might improve their approving/crawl system to avoid this kind of blogs/boards/forums on their network.

According to web.archive, fullpornsets.com has been on the dark side for a long time.
http://web.archive.org/web/*/http://fullpornsets.com

It's not our job to make their job.

That would be valid point if they weren't good about blocking stuff like this when notified, your just trying to make them look like shit for no reason.

So I'll do your job and send Jay a message and sure it will be handled quickly.

[PMProducoes]

Okay!

My bad then..

[brassmonkey]

Originally Posted by PMProducoes

Okay!

My bad then..

[faxxaff]

Originally Posted by Markul

I don't think any ad network has the manpower to manually go over every website and then go over them the next day in case they choose to join the dark side and if they are ok the next day, then go over them the day after..... see where this is going?

Here: http://www.juicyads.com/contact.php

Why wouldn't they be able to do due diligence on a recurring level? Back 15 years ago link lists and TGPs had some spiffy scripts to detect cheaters. Ad networks can have the same. Adsense figures out cheaters within a day.

Honestly, adult ad networks must be looking the other way and hope nobody finds out.

[Wizzo]

I just received a message about this thread and we will be removing it from our network and thanks to those that support us and help us in trying to keep the network clean.

[Markul]

Originally Posted by faxxaff

Why wouldn't they be able to do due diligence on a recurring level? Back 15 years ago link lists and TGPs had some spiffy scripts to detect cheaters. Ad networks can have the same. Adsense figures out cheaters within a day.

Honestly, adult ad networks must be looking the other way and hope nobody finds out.

I think the right question is how would they do this? I am sure that if they could, many would.

[Klen]

Originally Posted by Markul

I think the right question is how would they do this? I am sure that if they could, many would.

Yes this is something what cannot be done automated,as this isn't technical problem,this is legal problem and just by reading words you cant auto detect is it site legal or not.

[LeRoy]

Yep.. just email them and they're on it like white on rice

[chaze]

It's so hard to keep track in real time. That's awesome they take down sites like this. These sites are bad for everyone.

[Focus]

Originally Posted by Ace of Spades

That would be valid point if they weren't good about blocking stuff like this when notified, your just trying to make them look like shit for no reason.

So I'll do your job and send Jay a message and sure it will be handled quickly.

While at it don't forget to get your cut comedian.

[faxxaff]

Originally Posted by KlenTelaris

Yes this is something what cannot be done automated,as this isn't technical problem,this is legal problem and just by reading words you cant auto detect is it site legal or not.

I disagree, totally. Flagging sites with download links to 150 Mb or 400Mb files is pretty easy to automate.

[brassmonkey]

they still have the content tho

[ravo]

Anyone want to report the site to plugrush or trafficholder?...

[Klen]

Originally Posted by faxxaff

I disagree, totally. Flagging sites with download links to 150 Mb or 400Mb files is pretty easy to automate.

What if those files are legally bought ? One thing is sure,when you use automated scanning you cant have 100% accuracy - for example,look at pirate content removal companies which was sending dmca to legit affiliates.

[AdultKing]

Originally Posted by Wizzo

I just received a message about this thread and we will be removing it from our network and thanks to those that support us and help us in trying to keep the network clean.

I'd like to add that Juicy Ads are doing a pretty good job of keeping their network clean but with thousands of publishers websites, it is sometimes easy for the bad guys to slip under the radar.

That said, I occasionally get push back from Jay, sometimes it's not enough just to demonstrate that the piracy exists. I had a recent case where bestiality was on a particular website and by the time it was dealt with the publisher had removed Juicy Ads in any case.

However to anyone who thinks Juicy Ads is a bad network they are mistaken.

[faxxaff]

Originally Posted by KlenTelaris

What if those files are legally bought ? One thing is sure,when you use automated scanning you cant have 100% accuracy - for example,look at pirate content removal companies which was sending dmca to legit affiliates.

Of course automation is not 100% accurate, but it's a smart tool to flag fishy and dangerous content (i.e. malware, beastiality, cp, copyright infringments, etc.) and request review by fraud department. They should have staff in place to verify and protect the interest of their customers and their own once questionable content is found. They do have those resources. It's just a matter to deploy them in a smart way.