News Cops cant look at your phone without a warrant - GoFuckYourself.com

Seth Manson · 06-25-2014, 06:55 PM

...or unless you are stupid enough to waive your rights. Or if your name is Rochard.

Quote:

After years of legal debate, the Supreme Court has told the cops to keep their hands off Americans? cell phones?at least until they get a search warrant.

The court released a landmark decision Wednesday morning in the case of Riley vs. California, forbidding warrantless police searches of the contents of arrestees? cell phones. The ruling opinion notes that cell phones have in fact become tiny computers in Americans? pockets teeming with highly private data, and that gaining access to them is now fundamentally different from rifling through someone?s pockets or purse. ?A decade ago officers might have occasionally stumbled across a highly personal item such as a diary, but today many of the more than 90% of American adults who own cell phones keep on their person a digital record of nearly every aspect of their lives,? the opinion reads.

http://www.wired.com/2014/06/supreme...out-a-warrant/

brassmonkey · 06-25-2014, 07:00 PM

nothing it my phone is illegal

you worried about something??

Captain Kawaii · 06-25-2014, 07:02 PM

Its good they put an end to this. There have been an increasing number of incidents where police confiscate phones at "crime" scenes.

Due · 06-25-2014, 07:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by brassmonkey

nothing it my phone is illegal

you worried about something??

I would be worried. They may treat you very differently if they saw 20 different porn sites on your phone or some post by Ahmed wanting to trade his missiles and grenades for room upgrades or western women.
When working in adult it's very easy to piss off some people. Think Polk county....

glowlite · 06-25-2014, 08:11 PM

That's true, effective at today's hearing cell/smartphone accounts are "off limits".

Rochard · 06-25-2014, 09:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Seth Manson

...or unless you are stupid enough to waive your rights. Or if your name is Rochard.
[/url]

I find it amusing that people believe they can speak on my behalf.

I agree with this ruling. While I myself can care less if anyone reads my texts or what not, I believe that our cell phone is our private property - much like our car or our wallet. Police should not be able to search this at will.

Seth Manson · 06-25-2014, 10:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard

I find it amusing that people believe they can speak on my behalf.

I agree with this ruling. While I myself can care less if anyone reads my texts or what not, I believe that our cell phone is our private property - much like our car or our wallet. Police should not be able to search this at will.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard

I really believe that if you have nothing to hide, you have no worries. Police can search my phone at will. All they'll find is text messages from my wife asking me what kind of fast food she wants me to bring home.

Seriously, STFU

Barry-xlovecam · 06-25-2014, 11:20 PM

https://ssd.eff.org/your-computer/govt/sita

This is an exception to SITA (Search Incident to Arrest)

Your cell phone may require a warrant but a search of your wallet in your back pocket does not, when your are arrested, with or without a warrant as the circumstances dictate (in the USA).

Quote:

?That is like saying a ride on horseback is materially indistinguishable from a flight to the moon,? the Supreme Court?s ruling reads. ?Modern cell phones, as a category, implicate privacy concerns far beyond those implicated by a cigarette pack, a wallet or a purse.?

http://www.wired.com/2014/06/supreme...out-a-warrant/

Interesting that they would make that distinction. But then the police or the Feds need a warrant to search any computer if they want the evidence allowed in court ... So, the ruling makes sense in that light. Of course, they can arrest you and get a warrant by wire easily enough -- so the ruling just creates a waiting period or an obstacle -- like 20 minutes ...

AsianDivaGirlsWebDude · 06-26-2014, 12:34 AM

Good to see the Supreme Court get one right every once in awhile...

ADG

Seth Manson · 06-26-2014, 06:39 PM

Rochard? Rochard? Where did you go?

06-25-2014, 07:00 PM	#2
brassmonkey Pay It Forward Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Yo Mama House Posts: 77,307	nothing it my phone is illegal you worried about something?? __________________ TRUMP 2025 KEKAW!!! - The Laken Riley Act Is Law! DACA ENDED - SUPPORT AZ HCR 2060 52R - email: brassballz-at-techie.com

06-26-2014, 12:34 AM	#9
AsianDivaGirlsWebDude Purveyor, Fine Asian Porn Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: San Francisco Bay Area Posts: 38,323	Good to see the Supreme Court get one right every once in awhile... ADG __________________ Asian Diva Girls - Exclusive Photos and Videos Asian Diva Girls Affiliate Program (50% ccBill Revshare)

06-25-2014, 07:02 PM	#3
Captain Kawaii So Fucking Banned Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2007 Posts: 6,748	Its good they put an end to this. There have been an increasing number of incidents where police confiscate phones at "crime" scenes.

06-25-2014, 08:11 PM	#5
glowlite Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: Arizona/Indiana Posts: 366	That's true, effective at today's hearing cell/smartphone accounts are "off limits".

06-26-2014, 06:39 PM	#10
Seth Manson Please dont fuck animals Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2010 Location: Henderson, NV Posts: 3,988	Rochard? Rochard? Where did you go?