ROXY shot at f/22

[ezgirl]

Another amateur girl in amateur setting shot at f/22. You can click on the image for full size. Just a regular girl being naked for you and me (and the world). We love real girls.
[IMG][/IMG]
[IMG][/IMG]
[IMG][/IMG]
[IMG][/IMG]
[IMG][/IMG]
[IMG][/IMG]

[dyna mo]

f/22 = yes

roxy = no

[MrTrollkien]

Can I have a review copy?

[MrBottomTooth]

Great photography. For some reason it looks like the model was one of the cavewomen from quest for fire that someone unfroze from a solid block of ice and cleaned up. Now they're going to introduce her to their friends at high school and hijinxs ensue.

[ezgirl]

Yeah, they all wear wigs, of course it is hard to blame them, black girl hair is often unforgiving. Think of it as sex-hair.

[djroof]

nice....

[pornguy]

How about shooting her at 9mm or .45?

[Jim_Gunn]

Originally Posted by pornguy

How about shooting her at 9mm or .45?

Too funny!

[2MuchMark]

Originally Posted by pornguy

How about shooting her at 9mm or .45?

Ok. I LOL'ed.

[xXXtesy10]

that dude is cool

[romeo22]

what a lovely smile she has

[PaperstreetWinston]

her face has some good angles that have potential, nice bod def

[bns666]

why emphasize on f22?

f2.2 or 2.0 would look much more stylish

[DAMNMAN]

Originally Posted by dyna mo

f/22 = yes

roxy = no

This!!!!

[CaptainHowdy]

Love her, I'm a great "Quest for Fire" fan...

[Spunky]

I'm not feeling this one

[ottopottomouse]

Originally Posted by pornguy

How about shooting her at 9mm or .45?

lolololololol

for some reason she has ended up looking like she needs a good wash.

[johnny o]

f22 is to allow everyone to see your sub par location in crystal clear detail. this is fabulous

[Jim_Gunn]

Originally Posted by johnny o

f22 is to allow everyone to see your sub par location in crystal clear detail. this is fabulous

The location is much nicer looking than the model in this case.

[Captain Kawaii]

I see a new niche, hairybubblebutts - ok bod, face is a trainwreck.

[Markul]

I like her, cute, looks friendly, would fuck

[shoot twice]

Personally I find the girl attractive. She has a very warm smile and her body is inviting.

As for the photos well I've seen worse and I've seen better. But this isn't a competition and they more than hold their own against pretty much anything currently being produced.

My only comment is that I think the girl has some great potential and it's a shame that this isn't the 70s. A good makeup artist and shot on film would really make her look like a million bucks. But I suppose it's because I'll never appreciate the way digital photos can make shaved pussy look like the lunar surface because of the razor burn.

[EngineCash]

She looks so hot... Great job...

[seeandsee]

This girl is very exotic

[ezgirl]

Originally Posted by bns666

why emphasize on f22?

f2.2 or 2.0 would look much more stylish

Because of criticism made on another thread about Grapesoda shooting amateur content at f/22. Thus this post showing typical pro-am content shot at high f/stop so viewer can see the background in focus thus lending to the realism sought in amateur. A n interesting conversation resulted regarding the merits of low vs high f/stop with the post of a photo of a girl stranded in the desert taken at low f/stop so the background was blurred. Those of us in the pro-am camp use high f/stop to bring the background into sharp focus.

https://gfy.com/fucking-around-and-pr...help-newb.html

[John-ACWM]

Originally Posted by pornguy

How about shooting her at 9mm or .45?

[ezgirl]

Originally Posted by shoot twice

Personally I find the girl attractive. She has a very warm smile and her body is inviting.

As for the photos well I've seen worse and I've seen better. But this isn't a competition and they more than hold their own against pretty much anything currently being produced.

My only comment is that I think the girl has some great potential and it's a shame that this isn't the 70s. A good makeup artist and shot on film would really make her look like a million bucks. But I suppose it's because I'll never appreciate the way digital photos can make shaved pussy look like the lunar surface because of the razor burn.

Most pussies look smooth from a distance, I shoot in close - inches. I am amazed at how many girls show up with a week's growth so it looks like a man's 5 O'clock shadow. I began shaving them myself and got very tired of it very fast. My shoot instructions to the girls are two pages, type-written single spaced, including a good section on "HOW TO MAKE YOUR PUSSY BALD". Waxing is best, but I only get one or two a year, so I tell them to shave with a shaving cream, not soap, use a fresh razor and not the one they shaved their legs with, and do it just before their call date. I have had really good results with that. But, pussies were not meant to be shaved, and you do get razor burn and little bump scars that never go away and that always get irritated with each shave. Black girls are really bad, the scars are large and very visible and seem to get worse with time. White girls can be bad too, they get very red and ugly razor burn. I have given a lot of thought to having a waxer here and filming the wax job as part of the shoot, but most girls are terrified of it, some have very sensitive skin and get bad results which means we have to cancel, and all of them get a red inflammation which is very visible all day. It really needs 24hrs to calm down before skin color returns to normal. So I just move along doing the best I can with what we have. Bad razor burn, don't go in close.

[shoot twice]

Originally Posted by ezgirl

Most pussies look smooth from a distance, I shoot in close - inches. I am amazed at how many girls show up with a week's growth so it looks like a man's 5 O'clock shadow. I began shaving them myself and got very tired of it very fast. My shoot instructions to the girls are two pages, type-written single spaced, including a good section on "HOW TO MAKE YOUR PUSSY BALD". Waxing is best, but I only get one or two a year, so I tell them to shave with a shaving cream, not soap, use a fresh razor and not the one they shaved their legs with, and do it just before their call date. I have had really good results with that. But, pussies were not meant to be shaved, and you do get razor burn and little bump scars that never go away and that always get irritated with each shave. Black girls are really bad, the scars are large and very visible and seem to get worse with time. White girls can be bad too, they get very red and ugly razor burn. I have given a lot of thought to having a waxer here and filming the wax job as part of the shoot, but most girls are terrified of it, some have very sensitive skin and get bad results which means we have to cancel, and all of them get a red inflammation which is very visible all day. It really needs 24hrs to calm down before skin color returns to normal. So I just move along doing the best I can with what we have. Bad razor burn, don't go in close.

I guess I'm about to show my age here but personally I never really understood the entire "bald" trend. In my personal life the vagina I like the best is the one that's being offered in front of me. Hairy or shaved is a stupid debate (It's not a competition ). A woman should do with her vagina what she feels makes her happy. And when a woman is happy she's sexy and good photographer can capture that.

As a shooter I find that in the digital medium that regardless of how you set up the shot, any kind of skin blemish jumps out the picture. For example the lovely lady you shot has a some facial acne and a pimple slowly growing on her chin. Now photographer can play with lighting, filters and call in a good make-up artist and all that will help a lot. But is anyone really willing to pay for this amount of work?

And if someone was going to go the extra mile then obviously it would be necessary to chose a more experienced model. I'm not ridiculing or condemning by any means the lovely lady in your photos. But it's obvious she's has got to get a few more good quality scenes under her belt to in order to learn how to pose.

Yes, F/22 puts the realism in the photo that today's porn consumer craves. Not just the background but whole sha-bang...including clogged pores.

[SekobA]

she is fuckable

[CourtneyR]

no no no no.

[jaYMan]

Originally Posted by pornguy

How about shooting her at 9mm or .45?

pffffffhh! rflmao almost spit out my coffee pg

[ezgirl]

Originally Posted by shoot twice

I guess I'm about to show my age here but personally I never really understood the entire "bald" trend. In my personal life the vagina I like the best is the one that's being offered in front of me. Hairy or shaved is a stupid debate (It's not a competition ). A woman should do with her vagina what she feels makes her happy. And when a woman is happy she's sexy and good photographer can capture that.

As a shooter I find that in the digital medium that regardless of how you set up the shot, any kind of skin blemish jumps out the picture. For example the lovely lady you shot has a some facial acne and a pimple slowly growing on her chin. Now photographer can play with lighting, filters and call in a good make-up artist and all that will help a lot. But is anyone really willing to pay for this amount of work?

And if someone was going to go the extra mile then obviously it would be necessary to chose a more experienced model. I'm not ridiculing or condemning by any means the lovely lady in your photos. But it's obvious she's has got to get a few more good quality scenes under her belt to in order to learn how to pose.

Yes, F/22 puts the realism in the photo that today's porn consumer craves. Not just the background but whole sha-bang...including clogged pores.

We pretty much think alike. I especially like your comment: ".. the vagina I like the best is the one that's being offered in front of me."

I shoot with settings on sharp and sharpen just a little post. Yes, you can see blemishes, but this is what you would see if you were sitting across from her at Starbucks. If you look just about everywhere else in the porn world they have a very, very soft focus. With the popularity of X-art style you see a soft focus that borders on no focus, as though the lens was dirty or there is fog in the room. Then with depth of field shots you have one side of the face in focus and the other out of focus. Obviously people love that or they wouldn't be buying it, and it clearly satisfies the fantasy element and even the art side. But I like realism and try to find buyers who like that as well. It fits well with your notion of being satisfied with the vagina in front of you.