![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||
Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. |
![]() ![]() |
|
Discuss what's fucking going on, and which programs are best and worst. One-time "program" announcements from "established" webmasters are allowed. |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Promoting Debate on GFY
Industry Role:
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 27,173
|
New law blocks anti-GMO scientists from advising EPA
House Republicans just passed a bill forbidding scientists from advising the EPA on their own research
![]() Congressional climate wars were dominated Tuesday by the U.S. Senate, which spent the day debating, and ultimately failing to pass, a bill approving the construction of the Keystone XL pipeline. While all that was happening, and largely unnoticed, the House was busy doing what it does best: attacking science. H.R. 1422, which passed 229-191, would shake up the EPA?s Scientific Advisory Board, placing restrictions on those pesky scientists and creating room for experts with overt financial ties to the industries affected by EPA regulations. The bill is being framed as a play for transparency: Rep. Michael Burgess, R-Texas, argued that the board?s current structure is problematic because it ?excludes industry experts, but not officials for environmental advocacy groups.? The inclusion of industry experts, he said, would right this injustice. But the White House, which threatened to veto the bill, said it would ?negatively affect the appointment of experts and would weaken the scientific independence and integrity of the SAB.? In what might be the most ridiculous aspect of the whole thing, the bill forbids scientific experts from participating in ?advisory activities? that either directly or indirectly involve their own work. In case that wasn?t clear: experts would be forbidden from sharing their expertise in their own research ? the bizarre assumption, apparently, being that having conducted peer-reviewed studies on a topic would constitute a conflict of interest. ?In other words,? wrote Union of Concerned Scientists director Andrew A. Rosenberg in an editorial for RollCall, ?academic scientists who know the most about a subject can?t weigh in, but experts paid by corporations who want to block regulations can.? House Republicans just passed a bill forbidding scientists from advising the EPA on their own research - Salon.com
__________________
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
So Fucking Banned
Industry Role:
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: N.Y. -Long Island --
Posts: 122,992
|
yesssssssssssssss
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |