Women Carry DNA of Casual Sex Partners for Life

[bagfull]

Women Carry DNA of Casual Sex Partners for Life


Women Carry DNA of Casual Sex Partners for Life
Women absorb and carry living DNA and cells from every male
they have sexual intercourse with. Originally it was assumed that all male Mc DNA found hosting in the female brain was from a male pregnancy, but, when they autopsied the brains of women who had never even been pregnant they still found male DNA prevalent in the female brain. CONCLUSIONS: Male microchimerism was not infrequent in women without sons. Besides known pregnancies, other possible sources of male microchimerism include unrecognized spontaneous abortion, vanished male twin, an older brother transferred by the maternal circulation, or SEXUAL INTERCOURSE.
This has very important ramifications for women. Especially
promiscuous women who practice unprotected sexual intercourse.
Every male you absorb spermatazoa from becomes a living part
of you for life. The women autopsied in this study were elderly.
Some had carried the living male DNA for well over 50 years. The DNA in the male sperm will go through the blood brain barrier and the woman with then be a host for that male DNA.

PubMed Mobile - NCBI...

[JesseQuinn]

how creepy, this is a wicked advertisement for condoms

if true I wonder if the same applies to anal sex? if so this wouldn't just be a 'horrors of the slutty women' field day for the RedPill crowd, lots of men would be 'carriers' as well

either way, creepy as hell concept. glad I did my part to keep the latex industry booming during my single years

[RummyBoy]

That's a grossification of copulation.....

It's a great way for Science to discover something that might reduce population.

[satyasol]

I'm still shocked by the "news"

[thecatwrites]

hmmm....

[just a punk]

Originally Posted by bagfull

Women Carry DNA of Casual Sex Partners for Life Women absorb and carry living DNA and cells from every male they have sexual intercourse with.

No she's not. This theory has never been proven. What about DNA of people we are kissing with? What about DNA of people who were a blood donors? What about DNA of animals that bite us? The reality is very simple: our immunity kills every non-native (external) DNA. That's why people with transplanted organs are on immunosuppressive drugs for life.

[RummyBoy]

I wonder if it will come out that its the reason why couples together over a long time are supposed to sometimes "start to look like each other"

[sumphatpimp]

don't swallow

[Phoenix]

As a guy I have to admit i sort of like this idea..lol
Although i think it is not true.

[killerbunny]

Originally Posted by sumphatpimp

don't swallow

simply...

[seeandsee]

this looks like fake, but maybe sperm have some special tool to get into brain

[Due]

Originally Posted by CyberSEO

No she's not. This theory has never been proven. What about DNA of people we are kissing with? What about DNA of people who were a blood donors? What about DNA of animals that bite us? The reality is very simple: our immunity kills every non-native (external) DNA. That's why people with transplanted organs are on immunosuppressive drugs for life.

Interesting. Maybe the body doesn't reject DNA absorbed through the uterus.
Wonder if your DNA could be passed on to someone else kid if you fucked the mom in the past.
It would explain all the sex orgies in Mensa Elite

[disinfected]

Super... there are now over a hundred of me running around in women's heads

[just a punk]

Originally Posted by Due

Interesting. Maybe the body doesn't reject DNA absorbed through the uterus.
Wonder if your DNA could be passed on to someone else kid if you fucked the mom in the past.

When I was born, I've got infected via umbilical cord in anti-sanitary Soviet hospital (a few of other kids got the same disease. There was an investigation and blah-blah but who cares?) I had a sepsis and got a 100's of blood transfusions from other people. Do you think I have their DNA's now?

[CaptainHowdy]

[Mutt]

Originally Posted by CyberSEO

No she's not. This theory has never been proven. What about DNA of people we are kissing with? What about DNA of people who were a blood donors? What about DNA of animals that bite us? The reality is very simple: our immunity kills every non-native (external) DNA. That's why people with transplanted organs are on immunosuppressive drugs for life.

I can't answer those questions but this wasn't some junk scientific study, it was done at a very well known cancer research center and in the conclusion of the study they did include 'sexual intercourse' as a *possible* source for the male DNA.
Of course the internet jumps on this and we end up with sensational stories that women carry the DNA of every loser they ever slept with.

My guess is that the only male DNA a woman might retain from a sex partner is coming from spontaneous abortions of pregancies they were never aware of. A sperm fertilizing an egg is obviously a very different process than blood transfusions, dog bites and organ transplants, and neither you or I have the knowledge to know that difference.

Male microchimerism in women without so... - PubMed Mobile - NCBI

CONCLUSIONS: Male microchimerism was not infrequent in women without sons. Besides known pregnancies, other possible sources of male microchimerism include unrecognized spontaneous abortion, vanished male twin, an older brother transferred by the maternal circulation, or sexual intercourse. Male microchimerism was significantly more frequent and levels were higher in women with induced abortion than in women with other pregnancy histories. Further studies are needed to determine specific origins of male microchimerism in women.

[MassMarketing]

Next thing you know there will be a "internet news" article about women growing men in their brains...

[shoot twice]

Yea well the women I date would be able to clone an army with the male DNA they've swallowed.

And frankly I don't care.

[pornmasta]

Originally Posted by CyberSEO

When I was born, I've got infected via umbilical cord in anti-sanitary Soviet hospital (a few of other kids got the same disease. There was an investigation and blah-blah but who cares?) I had a sepsis and got a 100's of blood transfusions from other people. Do you think I have their DNA's now?

there is not so much dna in blood (in white cells)

[pornmasta]

Originally Posted by MassMarketing

women growing men in their brains...

some people need help

[hadden]

Originally Posted by CaptainHowdy

That sperm was just waiting for its brothers.

[aka123]

Non-casual partners sperm is not absorbed as they don't get pussy? Or is this some promiscuity warning (beware hos)?

[blackmonsters]

Bullshit.
Them ho's were dumb before they started fucking.

[newB]

Originally Posted by CyberSEO

No she's not. This theory has never been proven. What about DNA of people we are kissing with? What about DNA of people who were a blood donors? What about DNA of animals that bite us? The reality is very simple: our immunity kills every non-native (external) DNA. That's why people with transplanted organs are on immunosuppressive drugs for life.

Your immune system responds to protein markers, not DNA. Granted, foreign DNA is typically wrapped up in foreign protein, such as the cell coat of a virus, but it's that cell coat your immune system recognizes and targets the cell for lysis and removal. Get that DNA into a cell, and as long as it does not interfere with the health of the cell, it is likely to remain. Scientists have been introducing non-native DNA into plant and animal cells for years. It's the basis of Gene Therapy.

On a related (no pun intended) note, lots of female insects store the viable sperm of their mates and can continue to have offspring from just that one union for the rest of their lives.

[just a punk]

Originally Posted by newB

Your immune system responds to protein markers, not DNA.

The DNA is always wrapped in protein (except some types of non-enveloped viruses) when we are talking about blood or sperm.

And once again: the immune system reacts to foreign DNA/RNA too (e.g. Herpes which has no protein coating).

[slapass]

Originally Posted by pornmasta

there is not so much dna in blood (in white cells)

There must be in red blood cells as that is how they caught the bicyclists that added red blood cells of other people to their blood. DNA test.

[VikingMan]

Even if the sperm idea is not valid just think about how many abortions the average woman has had. It is very common for women to have had at least 2 abortions. So that nice girl you are thinking about procreating with has DNA from those two losers.

[pornmasta]

Originally Posted by slapass

There must be in red blood cells as that is how they caught the bicyclists that added red blood cells of other people to their blood. DNA test.

Nuclear DNA - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Nuclear DNA is known as the molecule of life and contains the genetic instructions for the development of all living organisms. It is found in almost every cell in the human body, with exceptions such as red blood cells.

[pornmasta]

Originally Posted by VikingMan

It is very common for women to have had at least 2 abortions..

in the porn industry ?

[just a punk]

Originally Posted by VikingMan

So that nice girl you are thinking about procreating with has DNA from those two losers.

Still not. Even a mother of your kid will not get your DNA. Her own child is a semi-foreign organism for her own body. Both the woman and her child have different DNA (the child has DNA's of his mother and father, but mother has her own DNA only). They can even have two different non-compatible blood groups and Rh factors. Even non-enveloped viruses like HIV can't be transmitted from mother to her child during the pregnancy (in fact they can, but only during the birth process).

To sum it up: a woman won't get your DNA even if you make her pregnant. Your kid will have it, but not you woman and it can be easily proven by a simple DNA test that you can do almost in any clinic. So...

[VikingMan]

Originally Posted by pornmasta

in the porn industry ?

Dood, one girl in my high school had 5 abortions. I think a large amount of women have had at least one abortion. Or maybe I just have associated with too many whores.

[Mutt]

Originally Posted by CyberSEO

Still not. Even a mother of your kid will not get your DNA. Her own child is a semi-foreign organism for her own body. Both the woman and her child have different DNA (the child has DNA's of his mother and father, but mother has her own DNA only). They can even have two different non-compatible blood groups and Rh factors. Even non-enveloped viruses like HIV can't be transmitted from mother to her child during the pregnancy (in fact they can, but only during the birth process).

To sum it up: a woman won't get your DNA even if you make her pregnant. Your kid will have it, but not you woman and it can be easily proven by a simple DNA test that you can do almost in any clinic. So...

Why are you ignoring these studies which say otherwise?

Abstract

Bi-directional transplacental trafficking occurs routinely during the course of normal pregnancy, from fetus to mother and from mother to fetus. In addition to a variety of cell-free substances, it is now well recognized that some cells are also exchanged. Microchimerism refers to a small number of cells (or DNA) harbored by one individual that originated in a genetically different individual. While microchimerism can be the result of iatrogenic interventions such as transplantation or transfusion, by far the most common source is naturally acquired microchimerism from maternal-fetal trafficking during pregnancy. Microchimerism is a subject of much current interest for a number of reasons. During pregnancy, fetal microchimerism can be sought from the mothers blood for the purpose of prenatal diagnosis. Moreover, studies of fetal microchimerism during pregnancy may offer insight into complications of pregnancy, such as preeclampsia, as well as insights into the pathogenesis of autoimmune diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis which usually ameliorates during pregnancy. Furthermore, it is now known that microchimerism persists decades later, both fetal microchimerism in women who have been pregnant and maternal microchimerism in her progeny. Investigation of the long-term consequences of fetal and maternal microchimerism is another exciting frontier of active study, with initial results pointing both to adverse and beneficial effects. This review will provide an overview of microchimerism during pregnancy and of current knowledge regarding long-term effects of naturally acquired fetal and maternal microchimerism.

Naturally acquired microchimerism. - PubMed - NCBI

[Classy90]

Thanks CyberSEO for clearing this up.

[just a punk]

Originally Posted by Mutt

Why are you ignoring these studies which say otherwise?

Once again. Take your wife, go to the nearest clinic and do the simple DNA test. It's not so expensive and I believe you can afford it. If your DNA will be found in your wife's blood, please make sure to share with the results (sure it it will be a real bomb for our minds). Otherwise simple believe me - that's just a bullshit, which could be proven by anyone in anytime (but it never was). No "scientific studies" needed for that.

[CaptainHowdy]

Gotta love GFY scientists ...

[newB]

Originally Posted by CyberSEO

And once again: the immune system reacts to foreign DNA/RNA too (e.g. Herpes which has no protein coating).

And once you have herpes, you have it for life. If your body were mounting a constant immune response against that foreign DNA it would be like having lupus - a persistent load on your immune system that would eventually result in death.

Also, not sure where you are getting your info, but the herpes capsid is composed of proteins, and the nuclear envelope (the coat for the capsid outside of the host cell) is a lipid bilayer embedded with glycoproteins like that found in eukaryotic cells. As a virus, it is capable of changing those proteins in order to evade the immune response. When a person with herpes is shedding new enveloped viral cells is when you see the immunological response (ie the blister).

[just a punk]

Originally Posted by newB

And once you have herpes, you have it for life.

And will have have antibodies for it. These antibodies are generated by the immune system as a response to the virus DNA/RNA (70% of all adults have it).

[just a punk]

Originally Posted by newB

Also, not sure where you are getting your info, but the herpes capsid is composed of proteins, and the nuclear envelope (the coat for the capsid outside of the host cell) is a lipid bilayer embedded with glycoproteins like that found in eukaryotic cells.

Usually it's really enveloped but it can be non-enveloped too. Ok, let it be adenovirus. Does it change anything?

[newB]

Originally Posted by CyberSEO

And will have have antibodies for it. These antibodies are generated by the immune system as a response to the virus DNA/RNA (70% of all adults have it).

OK, you obviously aren't going to be dissuaded of your belief, so I'm just going to quit trying. The funny thing is, I think you know you're wrong, you just don't want to admit it.

[DamageX]

So wait... If women have male DNA in their brain, does that mean they're fucked in the head?

[just a punk]

Originally Posted by newB

OK, you obviously aren't going to be dissuaded of your belief, so I'm just going to quit trying. The funny thing is, I think you know you're wrong, you just don't want to admit it.

So you want to say that our immune system don't respond to non-enveloped viruses (the ones w/o protein markers, like adenoviruses)? For real?

P.S. To the believers. The human can have only one DNA. This is a simple explanation on why a female can not have a DNA of her male partners. Her DNA will be her for life.

[newB]

Originally Posted by CyberSEO

So you want to say that our immune system don't respond to non-enveloped viruses (the ones w/o protein markers, like adenoviruses)? For real?

P.S. To the believers. The human can have only one DNA. This is a simple explanation on why a female can not have a DNA of her male partners. Her DNA will be her for life.

I never said that, but since you really want to push it:

Adenoviruses don't have the lipid bilayer envelope, but their capsid is still comprised of proteins that make it recognizable to our immune system.
Adenoviridae - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Virus - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

As to just one DNA, that is also false. There is nuclear DNA (the DNA within the cells nucleus that make up our chromosomes, which is typically what we are referring to when we speak of DNA) and extrachromosomal DNA found outside of the nucleus which includes, but is not limited to, mDNA (mitochondrial DNA within the mitochondria, obviously). Nuclear DNA gets inherited reliably (ie each daughter cell gets one complete copy) but extracellular DNA is less exact and it is possible, but not likely, for one daughter cell to get all or none of the cytoplasmic materials.
Extrachromosomal DNA - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Take notice of the part where it says "In addition to DNA found outside of the nucleus in cells, infection of viral genomes also provides an example of extrachromosomal DNA."

As long as I'm dropping wikipedia links, here's one on gene therapy which is all about mediating the effects of defective genes by the in vivo introduction of functional genes. If the introduction of foreign DNA caused an automatic immune response targeting the host cell, there would be no such thing.

[newB]

Just thought of another example where blood cells would contain another person's DNA: Bone marrow transplants. The marrow produces the erythrocytes (white blood cells, which contain DNA) of the donor.

[pornmasta]

[MiamiBoyz]

Women are simply programmed to be sperm receptacles.

Those sluts have countless men's DNA inside them and then even take the time to tattoo the names of the same sperm donors on their well used(up) bodies! Pathetic

[DamageX]

Originally Posted by MiamiBoyz

Women are simply programmed to be sperm receptacles.

Those sluts have countless men's DNA inside them and then even take the time to tattoo the names of the same sperm donors on their well used(up) bodies! Pathetic

Misogynist much?

[Jel]

Originally Posted by DamageX

Misogynist much?

don't worry, he's a shit stabber. thank fuck he won't be passing his dna anywhere. like I've said before, he gives AIDS a good name.

[just a punk]

Originally Posted by newB

Just thought of another example where blood cells would contain another person's DNA: Bone marrow transplants. The marrow produces the erythrocytes (white blood cells, which contain DNA) of the donor.

All transplants have it. That's why people with transplanted organs have to take immunosuppressant drugs for life. Anyways, the foreign DNA will remain in that transplanted organ only and won't mix with yours. I mean if you do a blood test, there there will be your DNA only. Once again, it's something what can be easily proven in any clinic. There is 21th century and DNA tests are usual routine. Course if you don't live in caves

[aka123]

By the way, the link to the study isn't working.

Here, same stuff.. well, different conclusions from the origin, and without some "those damn whores" attitude. Especially regarding health, as that hasn't been yet mentioned.

"the harboring of genetic material and cells that were exchanged between fetus and mother during pregnancy -- have linked the phenomenon to autoimmune diseases and cancer, sometimes for better and other times for worse."

Male DNA commonly found in women’s brains, likely from prior pregnancy with a male fetus -- ScienceDaily

Here, link and quote from that pubmed study:

" CONCLUSIONS: Male microchimerism was not infrequent in women without sons. Besides known pregnancies, other possible sources of male microchimerism include unrecognized spontaneous abortion, vanished male twin, an older brother transferred by the maternal circulation, or sexual intercourse. Male microchimerism was significantly more frequent and levels were higher in women with induced abortion than in women with other pregnancy histories. Further studies are needed to determine specific origins of male microchimerism in women. "

"Or sexual in intercourse". It seems that some religious US folks (or something like that) picked up that and made an Youtube video about the dangers of promiscuous life style, especially regarding "casual" partners. Like I already pointed; what about the non-casual partners? Yeah, but that wont fit into their message, so it was left out.

[aka123]

I forgot the link to the study.

Male microchimerism in women without so... - PubMed Mobile - NCBI