Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Post New Thread Reply

Register GFY Rules Calendar
Go Back   GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum > >
Discuss what's fucking going on, and which programs are best and worst. One-time "program" announcements from "established" webmasters are allowed.

 
Thread Tools
Old 02-22-2015, 09:06 AM   #1
dickventure
Registered User
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 26
2257 Question

I have been researching all morning about 2257 for a website I am designing for a couple to promote their clips4sale site (not yet up).

I found a lot of info here and also I found a great article on 2257 here:
gregpiccionelli.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=202:t en-frequently-asked-questions-about-the-2257-regulations&catid=87:published&Itemid=1258#top

But I am still unclear something.

If on their website for promoting their C4S site they are only showing clips and pics that only contain ass & tits (cut down and screen shot so no sex, pussy or dicks), do they need a 2257 page? From the page above "Depictions that include lascivious exhibitions of the genitals or pubic area" ... are just asses and tits considered genitals?

Trust me, it is clear they are well over 18 ... but trying to make sure the right thing is done.

Thanks
DV
dickventure is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2015, 10:06 AM   #2
Barry-xlovecam
It's 42
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Global
Posts: 18,083
Notwithstanding USC 18 §2257A: see the definition of 'lascivious'.

Not legal advice. Offered for topical conversation only.
Barry-xlovecam is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2015, 10:18 AM   #3
pornlaw
Confirmed User
 
pornlaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 1,849
Also read the Dost case.

Dost test - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
__________________
Michael

www.AdultBizLaw.com
pornlaw is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2015, 11:15 AM   #4
dickventure
Registered User
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 26
Thanks for the feedback guys
dickventure is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2015, 11:39 AM   #5
myleene
Confirmed User
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Canada
Posts: 866
Just put one. You're better safe than sorry.
myleene is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2015, 12:27 PM   #6
Joshua G
dumb libs love censorship
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 8,198
get 2257. not cause of federal raid.

but because adult billers require, clips4sale prolly requires regardless of the nuance.

having it gives the producer the option of making future material that is more laviscious. only takes 1 2257 act to make the whole site 2257 rquired.

& its best to have the records if the owner should decide to sell. would be harder to market anything adult without 2257 records even if content is rated R.

Joshua G is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2015, 01:06 PM   #7
dickventure
Registered User
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 26
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joshua G View Post
having it gives the producer the option of making future material that is more laviscious. only takes 1 2257 act to make the whole site 2257 rquired.
This is a good point because maybe 1 act or photo may be received like that even if I or them don't think so.

But now when I tell them they will need to keep records (and which it is only the 2 of them) AND put the address of where the records are kept on the website, I don't think they are going to want to put their home address on the site. Are there other companies that can keep those records? Perhaps transfer files and documents? I'm sure as hell not keeping them for them (they have already been somewhat of a pain in the ass).
dickventure is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2015, 07:28 PM   #8
ManPuppy
Confirmed User
 
ManPuppy's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Tampa Bay, Florida, USA
Posts: 407
I'm glad this question was posted. I ran across a Twitter account that made me a little uncomfortable, tweeting selfies in undies, clearly underaged but not necessarily sexual themselves - unless you put them all together with that intent, as they are. I think the only Good Karma thing to do is report it to Twitter.
ManPuppy is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Post New Thread Reply
Go Back   GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum > >

Bookmarks

Tags
tits, found, genitals, page, website, site, dicks, pussy, depictions, lascivious, sex, considered, trust, asses, exhibitions, pubic, include, pics, clips4sale, promote, info, lot, couple, designing, question



Advertising inquiries - marketing at gfy dot com

Contact Admin - Advertise - GFY Rules - Top

©2000-, AI Media Network Inc



Powered by vBulletin
Copyright © 2000- Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.