Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Post New Thread Reply

Register GFY Rules Calendar
Go Back   GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum > >
Discuss what's fucking going on, and which programs are best and worst. One-time "program" announcements from "established" webmasters are allowed.

 
Thread Tools
Old 03-16-2015, 02:57 PM   #1
Diomed
Converting like it's 1999
 
Diomed's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: The South
Posts: 6,165
Non nude ADULT models..

Ok,

So I think non nude models where something is left up to the imagination is a lot more sexy than most of the hardcore shit out there these days so. I'm building a site around non nude adult models.

But even when I type in adult non nude model into the search engine, and even when including 18+.. Why am I still seeing the majority of photos these little girls in tight clothes and belly shirts with whole sites dedicated tgp style to these poor little bastards.

I know they are fully clothed in all, but how can shit like these even exist?

Does. It have something to do with free speech or some amendment like that?

It's one thing for those sites to be out there, but it's another for all of the search engines to pick up on them.

If there is a 17 year old non nude model.. Meh, no huge deal.. But some of the tags for these images are preteen and shit.

Am I crazy or how the fuck can shit like this even exist? It seems inanely wrong.

Don't get me wrong, as an adult webmaster I've seen some pretty terrible shit in my days, but I've been lucky never to come across anything illegal. I know this shit isn't illegal, but shouldn't it be at the least excluded from search engines?
__________________
10 years of experience in:

CHAT SALES - PAID TRAFFIC - CONVERSION - CREATIVES - CONSULTATION
Diomed is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2015, 03:21 PM   #2
PornDiscounts-V
Confirmed User
 
PornDiscounts-V's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: L.A.
Posts: 5,740
I have often wondered why the SE's don't ban searches for this kind of trash and remove the sites from their indexes. But then the whole policing the internets comes in. Which is something they don't want to do.
__________________
Blog Posts - Contextual Links - Hardlinks on 600+ Blog Network
* Handwritten * 180 C Class IPs * Permanent! * Many Niches! * Bulk Discounts! GFYPosts /at/ J2Media.net
PornDiscounts-V is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2015, 03:25 PM   #3
PornDiscounts-V
Confirmed User
 
PornDiscounts-V's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: L.A.
Posts: 5,740
Ohh... and if you thought Google was shitty about this, don't try Bing.

Not only does Bing contain some really shitty stuff, their keyword suggestion tools will suggest keywords that don't make any sense if they are trying to fight this sort of thing.
__________________
Blog Posts - Contextual Links - Hardlinks on 600+ Blog Network
* Handwritten * 180 C Class IPs * Permanent! * Many Niches! * Bulk Discounts! GFYPosts /at/ J2Media.net
PornDiscounts-V is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2015, 03:33 PM   #4
TeenCat
Too lazy to set a koala
 
TeenCat's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: CZ/EU forever!
Posts: 16,139
i am sorry, but there are those kind of models, as it is legal, and there is tons of those sites, now, how much sites are adult nonnude models? how many sites are there? five? so now do your counts, why do you see the non adult ones ... if there was tons of adult nn models, sure affiliates will be interested and will take over with serps, but now, why? there is nothing strange about it ... it is nonnude kids, same as on facebook ... it is sick, we know the purpose, but it is complete legit ... so, nevermind, move on ...
__________________

6bot
/ Coming again very soon!
Svit Zlin Radio 24/7!
TeenCat is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2015, 07:22 PM   #5
Diomed
Converting like it's 1999
 
Diomed's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: The South
Posts: 6,165
Quote:
Originally Posted by TeenCat View Post
i am sorry, but there are those kind of models, as it is legal, and there is tons of those sites, now, how much sites are adult nonnude models? how many sites are there? five? so now do your counts, why do you see the non adult ones ... if there was tons of adult nn models, sure affiliates will be interested and will take over with serps, but now, why? there is nothing strange about it ... it is nonnude kids, same as on facebook ... it is sick, we know the purpose, but it is complete legit ... so, nevermind, move on ...
I'm usually much better at picking up on your English.. but I guess today is not a good day to try and deduce whatever point your trying to make.

I guess I'm not supposed to complain about it?

It's legal, fine.. I understand that. My point was why the fuck are search engines actively putting that shit all in their searches and specifically image searches.

Especially when I'm searching: Adult Non Nude Models 18+

and I'm getting images of little girls in gross ass outfits with tags like "sexy preteen models in tight clothes".

Doesn't make sense.. and that was my point. Legal, or illegal.
__________________
10 years of experience in:

CHAT SALES - PAID TRAFFIC - CONVERSION - CREATIVES - CONSULTATION
Diomed is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2015, 07:57 PM   #6
TeenCat
Too lazy to set a koala
 
TeenCat's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: CZ/EU forever!
Posts: 16,139
Quote:
Originally Posted by Diomed View Post
I'm usually much better at picking up on your English.. but I guess today is not a good day to try and deduce whatever point your trying to make.

I guess I'm not supposed to complain about it?

It's legal, fine.. I understand that. My point was why the fuck are search engines actively putting that shit all in their searches and specifically image searches.

Especially when I'm searching: Adult Non Nude Models 18+

and I'm getting images of little girls in gross ass outfits with tags like "sexy preteen models in tight clothes".

Doesn't make sense.. and that was my point. Legal, or illegal.
those sites have almost no competition in serps, that is why it is there. and google cannot ban something that is legal
__________________

6bot
/ Coming again very soon!
Svit Zlin Radio 24/7!
TeenCat is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2015, 08:16 AM   #7
celandina
Too lazy to set a custom title
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 11,330
Quote:
Originally Posted by Diomed View Post
Ok,

So I think non nude models where something is left up to the imagination is a lot more sexy than most of the hardcore shit out there these days so. I'm building a site around non nude adult models.

But even when I type in adult non nude model into the search engine, and even when including 18+.. Why am I still seeing the majority of photos these little girls in tight clothes and belly shirts with whole sites dedicated tgp style to these poor little bastards.

I know they are fully clothed in all, but how can shit like these even exist?

Does. It have something to do with free speech or some amendment like that?

It's one thing for those sites to be out there, but it's another for all of the search engines to pick up on them.

If there is a 17 year old non nude model.. Meh, no huge deal.. But some of the tags for these images are preteen and shit.

Am I crazy or how the fuck can shit like this even exist? It seems inanely wrong.

Don't get me wrong, as an adult webmaster I've seen some pretty terrible shit in my days, but I've been lucky never to come across anything illegal. I know this shit isn't illegal, but shouldn't it be at the least excluded from search engines?

That is all what the fucking pedos have left... Just look at TLC "Toddlers and Tiaras" , the same fucks watch it...pedos and the moronic mothers who think that Honey Bo Bo is a star.... And do not forget the " slow motion replay of the junior gymnastic competitions"

.... You have picked a wrong content because you will NOT get the moronic mothers, ALL what you will get is the pedos and their Thailand travellers...
celandina is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2015, 08:25 AM   #8
Joshua G
dumb libs love censorship
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 8,198
dude. search engines are just algorithms. filtering out sites & trying to understand their context is impossible for global audience. in a sense you should be happy the government & ISPs & SEs do not censor the web like you suggest. they could just as easily ban non nude adult 18+. believe me, plenty of people would be happy to ban porn no matter how soft. only the constitution protects pornographers from politicians.

Joshua G is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2015, 09:01 AM   #9
MakeMeGrrrrowl
Grrrrrrrrr
 
MakeMeGrrrrowl's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Dreamland
Posts: 4,974
Quote:
Originally Posted by Diomed View Post
Ok,

So I think non nude models where something is left up to the imagination is a lot more sexy than most of the hardcore shit out there these days so. I'm building a site around non nude adult models.

I think that is SOOOOOOO super awesome. I think implied nude is hotter than a gaping pussy hole.

But I'm a girl so - I think by nature I will prefer the softer stuff.
MakeMeGrrrrowl is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Post New Thread Reply
Go Back   GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum > >

Bookmarks

Tags
shit, nude, adult, search, models, exist, wrong, model, engines, sites, illegal, days, meh, deal, huge, pick, tags, lucky, excluded, terrible, pretty, inanely, fuck, crazy, preteen



Advertising inquiries - marketing at gfy dot com

Contact Admin - Advertise - GFY Rules - Top

©2000-, AI Media Network Inc



Powered by vBulletin
Copyright © 2000- Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.