The BBC did a piece of porn addicted children

[Cherry7]

Porn addiction: 10% of 12-13 year olds worried about habits - BBC News

So I wrote to them;


A report on the dangers of porn to children, what could be simpler for a journalist to report on?

After all porn is by definition bad. Like drugs lots of people have tried them, but no one will defend drug dealing.

So in Sima Kotecha's report no surprise that no alternative voice was sought to challenge a report that had set out to find statistics to get upset about.

So did the reporter question the "shocking" statistics that 12-13 year olds watch porn? Seeing that 12-13 is when puberty is happening it maybe not unusual for them to be interested in sex, to be exploring their bodies and masturbating.

When children said they were worried about becoming addicted to sex, how was the question asked?
How many were worried what would happen if they were sexually repressed? Or was that question not asked?

Do the authors of the report think that masturbation is wrong? Or just porn?

Is masturbation ok as long as it done reading the bible?

What should children be looking at when they masturbate if not pornography?

If porn is so bad why does not the Church, State, schools, NSPCC produce erotic material that can get the kids "off" but in a way that they approve of?

After all these bodies have had a monopoly of the subject of sex for 2000 years why did they not produce that wholesome erotic material then instead of just banning everything?

Does the NSPCC think that it is OK that young people can have sex at 16 but if they film it is a crime and the go on the sex offenders register?

Does the reporter and the witnesses have a religious viewpoint? Are bringing their non rational hatred of sex to the table dressed up as pseudo science and medicine?

How has sexual repression worked out for the Catholic Church and Muslim countries throughout the world?

What damage to children has been proved in documented peer reviewed medical research? Not cherry picked anecdotes spoon fed to gullible journalists by organisations with an agenda.

So a pretty lazy shoddy piece of journalism - radio 4 is supposed to be intelligent radio - please challenge this puff reporting.