Editor of Lancet "scientific literature, perhaps half, may simply be untrue."

[wehateporn]

"The case against science is straightforward: much of the scientific literature, perhaps half, may simply be untrue. Afflicted by studies with small sample sizes, tiny effects, invalid exploratory analyses, and flagrant conflicts of interest, together with an obsession for pursuing fashionable trends of dubious importance, science has taken a turn towards darkness. As one participant put it, ?poor methods get results?."

http://www.thelancet.com/journals/la...696-1/fulltext

[MaDalton]

lol - says the one that says vaccination is bad based on one guy that fucked up because he got money for it.

you are a very amusing person

[wehateporn]

Originally Posted by MaDalton

lol - says the one that says vaccination is bad based on one guy that fucked up because he got money for it.

you are a very amusing person

You obviously haven't checked out any of the extensive sources I've been providing, I won't give up on you just yet though

Oh, by the way a CDC whistleblower has come forward and confirmed that the Autism link is being covered up, he was part of that cover-up, so Wakefield was right all along.

[CaptainHowdy]

Scientificism is a religion too ...

[MaDalton]

i look at billions of people that did not die thanks to vaccination over the last 100 years vs. a couple of weirdos with Youtube video proof and decide that listening to you would be like listening to an eunuch about his group sex experiences

[takethebluepill]

Originally Posted by MaDalton

i look at billions of people that did not die thanks to vaccination over the last 100 years vs. a couple of weirdos with Youtube video proof and decide that listening to you would be like listening to an eunuch about his group sex experiences

This sums it up quite nicely.

Nothing else to see here. Move along...

[wehateporn]

Originally Posted by MaDalton

i look at billions of people that did not die thanks to vaccination over the last 100 years vs. a couple of weirdos with Youtube video proof and decide that listening to you would be like listening to an eunuch about his group sex experiences

You assume vaccines save lives, you assume people didn't die or become disabled from vaccines, you also assume it's a couple of weirdos on YouTube. For you this is a religion, not a science

[wehateporn]

Originally Posted by CaptainHowdy

Scientificism is a religion too ...

Spot on!

[wehateporn]

Originally Posted by takethebluepill

This sums it up quite nicely.

Nothing else to see here. Move along...

Only to those of the pro-vaccine religion

[takethebluepill]

If pro vaccine means being happy that I did not die of some hedious disease thanks to a vaccination, then yep....pro vaccine I am.

[wehateporn]

Originally Posted by takethebluepill

If pro vaccine means being happy that I did not die of some hedious diesese thanks to a vaccination, then yep....pro vaccine I am.

Which diseases do you fear?

[dyna mo]

hey, thanks for the heads-up that the federal government recently ended its flouride conspiracy

US lowers fluoride levels in drinking water for first time in over 50 years | Environment | The Guardian

[wehateporn]

Originally Posted by dyna mo

hey, thanks for the heads-up that the federal government recently ended its flouride conspiracy

US lowers fluoride levels in drinking water for first time in over 50 years | Environment | The Guardian

They need to remove it completely

[wehateporn]

[dyna mo]

Originally Posted by wehateporn

They need to remove it completely

[wehateporn]

Originally Posted by dyna mo

Yes, some progress, they knew they were losing so they offered a compromise, hoping that the public wouldn't still demand for the complete removal of the toxin

[MiamiBoyz]

Originally Posted by wehateporn

"The case against science is straightforward: much of the scientific literature, perhaps half, may simply be untrue. Afflicted by studies with small sample sizes, tiny effects, invalid exploratory analyses, and flagrant conflicts of interest, together with an obsession for pursuing fashionable trends of dubious importance, science has taken a turn towards darkness. As one participant put it, ?poor methods get results?."

http://www.thelancet.com/journals/la...696-1/fulltext

FUCK HIM

[Barry-xlovecam]

97% of YouTube CT videos are total horseshit.

If you don't want fluoride in your water get an under the kitchen sink reverse-osmosis unit -- $300 -$500 -- that will remove 97% of the fluorides in the water.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qr2bSL5VQgM

[PR_Glen]

Originally Posted by Barry-xlovecam

97% of YouTube CT videos are total horseshit.

If you don't want fluoride in your water get an under the kitchen sink reverse-osmosis unit -- $300 -$500 -- that will remove 97% of the fluorides in the water.

why bother? its in just about every single product we consume regardless...

harmless

[wehateporn]

Originally Posted by PR_Glen

why bother? its in just about every single product we consume regardless...

Depends where you live, in the Europe most drinking water is not Fluoridated.

Even in your situation you should be thinking about the future generations, your children and grandchildren, just because you have been poisoned doesn't mean they should be too.

[Barry-xlovecam]

Originally Posted by PR_Glen

why bother? its in just about every single product we consume regardless...

harmless

I have my own water well so it's to remove trace elements and sodium from the water softer. It's used for making coffee, tea, cooking and drinking water.

I am more concerned about trace arsenic and other heavy elements.

There probably is trace fluoride in most processed foods.