![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||
Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. |
![]() ![]() |
|
Discuss what's fucking going on, and which programs are best and worst. One-time "program" announcements from "established" webmasters are allowed. |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Promoting Debate on GFY
Industry Role:
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 27,173
|
Brzezinski to Putin: Stop hitting OUR al-Qaeda or it?s World War III
![]() Former US national security adviser Zbigniew Brzezinski?s assertion that Washington should retaliate against Moscow for Russian airstrikes against US assets in Syria is a ?stunning admission? of the role America has played in the Syrian crisis, an American scholar in Wisconsin says. Dr. Kevin Barrett, a founding member of the Muslim-Jewish-Christian Alliance, made the remarks in a phone interview with Press TV on Tuesday while commenting on Brzezinski?s latest article about Russia in the Financial Times. Brzezinski advised President Barack Obama to attempt to disarm the Russians if they keep attacking the CIA-trained militants in Syria. ?The Russian naval and air presences in Syria are vulnerable, isolated geographically from their homeland,? Brzezinski wrote on Sunday. ?They could be ?disarmed? if they persist in provoking the US.? Dr. Barrett said that it is ?a stunning admission from a senior high-level policy advisor here in the US that the US in fact using al-Qaeda, or perhaps the Islamic State [the Daesh/ISIL terrorist group] as well, as assets.? ?This is not something that is normally admitted by officials from Washington, DC, that is that al-Qaeda in Syria, the al-Nusra Front, is actually a US ally,? he added. Brzezinski wrote that Moscow?s apparent decision to strike CIA?s militants ?at best? reflects ?Russian military incompetence,? and worst, ?evidence of a dangerous desire to highlight American political impotence.? He added that if Moscow continues to target these people, then Washington should retaliate against Russians. Continued Brzezinski to Putin: Stop hitting OUR al-Qaeda or it?s World War III | Veterans Today
__________________
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Confirmed User
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,157
|
The funny thing is Putin looks good because he's attacking ISIS - something US isn't really bothered about. The US went into Syria on the purpose of attacking ISIS but with the real agenda of removing Assad. So now Russia looks good by saying they're attacking ISIS when they knew all along they were in ISIS to defend Assad from the US/rebels.
Putin has way out manoeuvred Washington so this is why the US is now pissed off. They could never admit they were going for another bout of regime change - the Wolfowitz doctrine. This short speech from Wesley Clark on US foreign policy is very telling: "Wolfowitz and Cheney and Rumsfeld. They wanted us to de-stabilize the middle east. Turn it upside down. Make it under our control." "They could hardly wait to finish Iraq, so they could move into Syria." |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
I'm a great bowler.
Industry Role:
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Right Outside of Normal.
Posts: 13,309
|
Almost every terrorist group in the history of the Middle East has ties to the United States and CIA. It's widely known that the U.S. engages heavily in wars by proxy. Once the groups are no longer needed, they are declared "terrorists". That's pretty much what we're witnessing in Syria, and most of that area of the world.
![]() A little bit of research will show you exactly where the U.S. and CIA have had their hand in the Middle East, and why they hate America so much. Iran - The U.S. backed the ruthless Shah, and when Ayatollah Khomeini took over, he was demonized by the west. The U.S. was protecting the Shah when Iran wanted him back to stand trial for crimes against the people of Iran - which there were plenty. The U.S. then aided Iraq in a war which brought Saddam Hussein into power. Iraq - Saddam Hussein didn't want to play ball after the U.S. helped him against Iraq, so he had to be removed, turning Iraq into a battlefield since the 90's. Syria - The U.S. backed the rebels now known as ISIS - which turned out to be a much larger threat than Assad. Afghanistan - No Afghan citizen knew the U.S. fought a proxy war against the Soviets in Afghanistan. The U.S. supplied the Mujaheddin with weapons and support. They turned into Al-Qaeda and the Taliban. The U.S. is now in direct conflict with both groups. Name a terrorist group, and I'm pretty sure you can tie U.S. money to it in the past. Pretty fucked up if you ask me. The U.S. and her allies create the boogeymen the world fears so much. From freedom fighter backed by the CIA to world's most wanted terrorist. I couldn't imagine what happened. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
So Fucking Banned
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Tokyo Red Light District
Posts: 2,145
|
The CIA's involvement in Central and South America was so bad (assassinations and coups) the Senate tried to make laws against it but each law was deemed illegal until they had to "officially" ban the practice. Remember, Iran-Contra? Argentina? Chile? Ecuador? Gautemala? El Salvador?
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Confirmed User
Industry Role:
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 5,175
|
Quote:
Reminder: The Yugoslav authorities, under Slobodan Milo?ević, regarded the KLA as a terrorist group. In February 1998, U.S. President Bill Clinton's special envoy to the Balkans, Robert Gelbard, condemned both the actions of the Serb government and of the KLA, and described the KLA as "without any questions, a terrorist group".[64][65][66] UN resolution 1160 took a similar stance.[67][68] But the 1997 US Department's terrorist list hadn't included the KLA.[69] In March 1998, just one month later Gerbald had to modify his statements to say that KLA had not been classified legally by the U.S. government as a terrorist group,[68] and the US government approached the KLA leaders to make them interlocutors with the Serbs.[70][71][unreliable source?] A Wall Street Journal article claimed later that the US government had in February 1998 removed the KLA from the list of terrorist organisations,[70][72][73] a removal that has never been confirmed.[68] France didn't delist the KLA until late 1998, after strong US and UK lobbying.[74] KLA is still present in the MIPT Terrorism Knowledge Base list of terrorist groups,[39] and is listed as an inactive terrorist organisation by the National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism.[75] During the war, the KLA troops collaborated with the NATO troops, and they were qualified by NATO as "freedom fighters". In late 1999 the KLA was disbanded and its members entered the Kosovo Protection Corps.[70]
__________________
Femdom Destiny -------------------------------------------- ICQ: 463-630-426 email: webmaster(at)femdomdestiny.com |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
So fuckin' bored
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 32,384
|
Brzezinski is officially a terrorist who is directly responsible for raising of Taliban and Al Qaeda. I wonder how came he is not in prison yet? Are American taxpayers ok with that?
__________________
Obey the Cowgod |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
BACON BACON BACON
Industry Role:
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Poems everybody, the laddie fancies himself a poet
Posts: 35,457
|
looks half dead no wonder he wants to take the world with him
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Confirmed User
Industry Role:
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Canada
Posts: 9,058
|
they didn't 'raise' them they supplied them with arms to fight against your bullshit attack at the time. seemed to work well in that battle last i checked...
__________________
webmaster at pimproll dot com |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
So fuckin' bored
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 32,384
|
Quote:
Indeed, I do remember 9/11 too. 2977 killed in just one day - the most effective operation performed by CIA pets ever (for the money of the US taxpayers of course).
__________________
Obey the Cowgod |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |