Scientific Paper: Human Hand Designed by a ?Creator? - GoFuckYourself.com

wehateporn · 03-04-2016, 05:57 PM

A recent scientific paper on the movement of the human hand has faced strong criticism for referring to a 'Creator' throughout.

The paper, titled: 'Biomechanical characteristics of hand coordination in grasping activities of daily living' was written by a team of four researchers, three from Huazhong University in China, and one from Worcester Polytechnic Institute in Massachusetts.

Published in the PLOS ONE journal, the fairly conventional study looked at the mechanics of how we grasp things, and involved the measurement of the hand movements of 30 participants.

Continued Scientific paper which says the human hand was designed by a 'Creator' sparks controversy | Science | News | The Independent

MiamiBoyz · 03-04-2016, 06:51 PM

Who cares?

There will always be small minded fools who can't grasp the concept of gradual change over millions of years. It is simply too much for their tiny minds to grasp.

"There is grandeur in this view of life, with its several powers, having been originally breathed into a few forms or into one; and that whilst this planet has gone cycling on according to the fixed law of gravity, from so simple a beginning endless forms most beautiful and most wonderful have been, and are being, evolved." - Charles Darwin

"Biology is the study of complicated things that have the appearance of having been designed with a purpose." - Richard Dawkins

The Porn Nerd · 03-04-2016, 08:01 PM

JJust watch Ancient Aliens and believe every word Giorgio says. You will sleep better at night knowing what is really going on.

Until you get abducted by The Greys, of course.

MFCT · 03-05-2016, 12:44 AM

The Bell test experiments and the double-slit experiment proves that matter and consciousness are entangled. That's interesting. Well, I know all matter was created in the Big Bang, and all its scientific properties were set at that instant. Sure, matter has undergone many countless changes in form for untold billions of years. But its all still the same matter that was created in the Big Bang.

There obviously were no humans, or anything alive, at the time of the Big Bang. Yet, matter and consciousness are entangled. Therefore, I have no choice but to just accept that there had to be a consciousness when the Big Bang occurred.

But this opens up a can of worms. Can it be that consciousness doesn't require a host made of matter to exist? Can this mean life can go on after death? Can this mean that things we would consider "ghosts" or "spirits" are actually real? So God is real?

As an atheist, I've always taken so much pride in how I require scientific proof for everything. It makes me come across as so intelligent.

So how do I come across as atheist/intelligent, without spouting off about how I require scientific proof for everything? Is it OK for an atheist to cherry-pick scientific proof for only things I want to believe in, yet still come across as intelligent? When science begins proving things I don't want to believe, I think it indicates the time has come for science to be banned. All atheists need to sign some kind of a petition, if we want to preserve our culture and our way of life.

We atheists have always put so much faith in science. And for what? It turns around and bites us in the ass.

dillfly2000 · 03-05-2016, 01:02 AM

So much better thinking for myself and not living under religious rule.

wehateporn · 03-05-2016, 04:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MiamiBoyz

There will always be small minded fools who can't grasp the concept of gradual change over millions of years. It is simply too much for their tiny minds to grasp.

True, but there seem to be even more who can't grasp the concept that once one species is sufficiently evolved it will fly around the Universe playing creator on other planets

CurrentlySober · 03-05-2016, 04:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MFCT

the double-slit experiment proves...

????

CaptainHowdy · 03-05-2016, 06:14 AM

Can't explain = God. That's the oldest trick in the book.

MiamiBoyz · 03-05-2016, 06:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wehateporn

True, but there seem to be even more who can't grasp the concept that once one species is sufficiently evolved it will fly around the Universe playing creator on other planets

Thanks for that is fantasy and I will stick to just the facts.

Look Chang · 03-05-2016, 06:36 AM

Monotheism was invented by dictators who needed an exta "sublminal" power to better exploit uneducated masses

Paul Markham · 03-05-2016, 07:48 AM

If there is a creator. He's nothing to do with any religion. Their books are too wrong for any link.

wehateporn · 03-05-2016, 07:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MiamiBoyz

Thanks for that is fantasy and I will stick to just the facts.

When we think of science, we have to be careful not to assume that current human science is the maximum which any species could reach, in theory there will be others far in advance of us

CaptainHowdy · 03-05-2016, 08:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wehateporn

When we think of science, we have to be careful not to assume that current human science is the maximum which any species could reach, in theory there will be others far in advance of us

celandina · 03-05-2016, 08:30 AM

Must have been Ted Cruz University study

brassmonkey · 03-05-2016, 09:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham

If there is a creator. He's nothing to do with any religion. Their books are too wrong for any link.

we don't know that

420 · 03-05-2016, 10:27 AM

300+ million years ago the creator decided 5 would be the maximum number of digits for the hands and feet of all species

ruff · 03-05-2016, 10:44 AM

Well, besides monkeys, we are the only animals that can jerk off so there must be a god.

CurrentlySober · 03-05-2016, 10:48 AM

03-04-2016, 05:57 PM	#1
wehateporn Promoting Debate on GFY Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2007 Posts: 27,173	Scientific Paper: Human Hand Designed by a ?Creator? A recent scientific paper on the movement of the human hand has faced strong criticism for referring to a 'Creator' throughout. The paper, titled: 'Biomechanical characteristics of hand coordination in grasping activities of daily living' was written by a team of four researchers, three from Huazhong University in China, and one from Worcester Polytechnic Institute in Massachusetts. Published in the PLOS ONE journal, the fairly conventional study looked at the mechanics of how we grasp things, and involved the measurement of the hand movements of 30 participants. Continued Scientific paper which says the human hand was designed by a 'Creator' sparks controversy \| Science \| News \| The Independent __________________ Sexy Girls Teasing

03-04-2016, 08:01 PM	#3
The Porn Nerd Living The Dream Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: Inside a Monitor Posts: 19,491	JJust watch Ancient Aliens and believe every word Giorgio says. You will sleep better at night knowing what is really going on. Until you get abducted by The Greys, of course. __________________ My Affiliate Programs: Porn Nerd Cash \| Porn Showcase \| Aggressive Gold Over 90 paysites to promote! Skype: peabodymedia

03-05-2016, 12:44 AM	#4
MFCT Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2015 Posts: 1,489	The Bell test experiments and the double-slit experiment proves that matter and consciousness are entangled. That's interesting. Well, I know all matter was created in the Big Bang, and all its scientific properties were set at that instant. Sure, matter has undergone many countless changes in form for untold billions of years. But its all still the same matter that was created in the Big Bang. There obviously were no humans, or anything alive, at the time of the Big Bang. Yet, matter and consciousness are entangled. Therefore, I have no choice but to just accept that there had to be a consciousness when the Big Bang occurred. But this opens up a can of worms. Can it be that consciousness doesn't require a host made of matter to exist? Can this mean life can go on after death? Can this mean that things we would consider "ghosts" or "spirits" are actually real? So God is real? As an atheist, I've always taken so much pride in how I require scientific proof for everything. It makes me come across as so intelligent. So how do I come across as atheist/intelligent, without spouting off about how I require scientific proof for everything? Is it OK for an atheist to cherry-pick scientific proof for only things I want to believe in, yet still come across as intelligent? When science begins proving things I don't want to believe, I think it indicates the time has come for science to be banned. All atheists need to sign some kind of a petition, if we want to preserve our culture and our way of life. We atheists have always put so much faith in science. And for what? It turns around and bites us in the ass. __________________ Keeping you abreast of the teens that get undressed. Girls By Location - Couples By Location - Guys By Location - Trans By Location

03-05-2016, 01:02 AM	#5
dillfly2000 hey Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2012 Location: with you Posts: 2,209	So much better thinking for myself and not living under religious rule. __________________ Chaturbate Affiliate

03-05-2016, 06:14 AM	#8
CaptainHowdy Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Happy in the dark. Posts: 92,989	Can't explain = God. That's the oldest trick in the book. __________________ FLASH SALE INSANITY! deal with a 100% Trusted Seller Buy Traffic Spots on a High-Quality Network 1 Year or Lifetime — That’s Right, Until the Internet Explodes!

03-04-2016, 06:51 PM	#2
MiamiBoyz fgfdftre6 Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2012 Location: In the closet with your dad! Posts: 6,690	Who cares? There will always be small minded fools who can't grasp the concept of gradual change over millions of years. It is simply too much for their tiny minds to grasp. "There is grandeur in this view of life, with its several powers, having been originally breathed into a few forms or into one; and that whilst this planet has gone cycling on according to the fixed law of gravity, from so simple a beginning endless forms most beautiful and most wonderful have been, and are being, evolved." - Charles Darwin "Biology is the study of complicated things that have the appearance of having been designed with a purpose." - Richard Dawkins

03-05-2016, 06:36 AM	#10
Look Chang Sexpat Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2010 Posts: 16,485	Monotheism was invented by dictators who needed an exta "sublminal" power to better exploit uneducated masses __________________ Bests Hot & Juicy Asian Girls Sex Sites : SEDUCTION -> FELLATIO -> CONCLUSION

03-05-2016, 07:48 AM	#11
Paul Markham Too old to care Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2001 Location: On the sofa, watching TV or doing my jigsaws. Posts: 52,943	If there is a creator. He's nothing to do with any religion. Their books are too wrong for any link. __________________ Blowout deal. 880 videos, 2,400 image sets, plus many RAW videos. $500. PM me for a deal. Skype Paulmarkham70

03-05-2016, 08:30 AM	#14
celandina Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2006 Posts: 11,343	Must have been Ted Cruz University study

03-05-2016, 10:27 AM	#16
420 cuck Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2003 Posts: 11,571	300+ million years ago the creator decided 5 would be the maximum number of digits for the hands and feet of all species

03-05-2016, 10:44 AM	#17
ruff I have a plan B Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: Seattle - Miami - St Kitts Posts: 5,501	Well, besides monkeys, we are the only animals that can jerk off so there must be a god. __________________ CryptoFeeds

03-05-2016, 10:48 AM	#18
CurrentlySober Too lazy to wipe my ass Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: A Public Bathroom Posts: 38,488	__________________ My AI Handywork... My Dream Gal... XXX 👁️ 👍️ 💩