cam girls . com - GoFuckYourself.com

Badmaash · 06-12-2016, 02:36 PM

So camgirls.com does not rank for "cam girls" - lol!

JesseQuinn · 06-12-2016, 02:46 PM

yeah, that happened a while back

think his site got hit during the general g00gle smack-down on sm whitelabels

j3rkules · 06-12-2016, 04:34 PM

It is owned by a guy that has been banned on here a while ago. I can not recall his nick.

Relic · 06-12-2016, 05:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jerkules

It is owned by a guy that has been banned on here a while ago. I can not recall his nick.

You mean that lunatic Graeme?

AdultKing · 06-12-2016, 11:23 PM

Graham Cooper. Complete nutjob.

Dick Smith food extortionist refused bail

https://gfy.com/members/cam_girls/

Seems he got himself banned again at some stage.

bns666 · 06-13-2016, 01:18 AM

nothing new...

Andreweb · 06-13-2016, 01:59 AM

That is definitely a premium cam domain .....

Denny · 06-13-2016, 03:31 AM

Duplicate content.

Badmaash · 06-17-2016, 08:27 AM

He spent 0.5mil on that domain hope he made his money back??

bns666 · 06-17-2016, 09:18 AM

as i remember, it was a $350k domain.

that domain was #1 or very high for various "cam girls" keywords and phrases for a long time so even if it's banned now i guess he returned the investment and made profit.

vending_machine · 06-17-2016, 09:21 AM

If any of you had any idea what revenue that site pulls in you would be talking a different story.. whatever

Speigelau · 06-17-2016, 10:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vending_machine

If any of you had any idea what revenue that site pulls in you would be talking a different story.. whatever

Yeah, he's more than tripled his 350k investment. Before streamate white labels got the duplicate content penalty, camgirls was pulling in hundreds of spenders from the serps and his advertising. I'm sure its cooled off now, but he had a really nice base of regular spenders. Wonder if the domain is still controlled by Rick Latona who made a sizable loan to Graham in the beginning.

bns666 · 06-17-2016, 11:58 AM

@vending_machine

btw, why is everyone forced to use streamate whois info on white label domains and camgirls.com has privacy turned on?

Speigelau · 06-17-2016, 12:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bns666

@vending_machine

btw, why is everyone forced to use streamate whois info on white label domains and camgirls.com has privacy turned on?

Probably a special situation because of the pawn loan on the domain where Latonas needed domain control as collateral.

bns666 · 06-17-2016, 12:20 PM

what difference does that make since anyone can own that domain either rick or graham, they require physical address and phone in whois info changed to them (streamate), even e-mail address doesn't have to be from streamate, but it can be from owner.

Barry-xlovecam · 06-17-2016, 12:24 PM

Court Won't Order Google To Lift Manual Block For "Thin Content" | ICF v. Google

Welcome to the past -- this affected all white labels -- not just Streamate's

ICF Technology, Inc. v. Google Inc., No. 2:2013cv02068 - Document 28 (W.D. Wash. 2013) :: Justia

Thin content was the issue -- UNIQUE content is king

bns666 · 06-17-2016, 12:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Barry-xlovecam

Court Won't Order Google To Lift Manual Block For "Thin Content" | ICF v. Google

Welcome to the past -- this affected all white labels -- not just Streamate's

ICF Technology, Inc. v. Google Inc., No. 2:2013cv02068 - Document 28 (W.D. Wash. 2013) :: Justia

Thin content was the issue -- UNIQUE content is king

didn't know they went this far with it

Speigelau · 06-17-2016, 01:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bns666

what difference does that make since anyone can own that domain either rick or graham, they require physical address and phone in whois info changed to them (streamate), even e-mail address doesn't have to be from streamate, but it can be from owner.

It makes all the difference because Latona isn't going to comply with the streamate white label stipulations, yet streamate definitely wanted their brand on this premium domain. Streamate doesn't want domain owners establishing a white label with them and then moving their spenders to another brand. If Latona had to seize the domain for non payment, he'd most likely move the domain elsewhere and he's going to want his info in the whois.

06-12-2016, 02:46 PM	#2
JesseQuinn feeding the wolves Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2012 Location: between sand and stars in Jamaica Posts: 6,224	yeah, that happened a while back think his site got hit during the general g00gle smack-down on sm whitelabels __________________ throwing molotav cocktails at the precinct

06-12-2016, 04:34 PM	#3
j3rkules VIP Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2013 Posts: 22,112	It is owned by a guy that has been banned on here a while ago. I can not recall his nick. __________________ How To Build A Porn Site And Make Money \| My Best $$$ Cam Sponsor \| New Webcam Script 3 Top Adult Hosting Providers

06-13-2016, 01:18 AM	#6
bns666 Confirmed Fetishist Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Fetishland Posts: 11,521	nothing new... __________________ ⭐ CAM SODA ⭐ STRIPCHAT ⭐ ⭐ CHATURBATE ⭐ X LOVE CAM ⭐

06-13-2016, 01:59 AM	#7
Andreweb Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2013 Location: Internet Posts: 2,425	That is definitely a premium cam domain ..... __________________ Make Money With: Chaturbate

06-13-2016, 03:31 AM	#8
Denny Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2005 Posts: 17,232	Duplicate content. __________________

06-12-2016, 02:36 PM	#1
Badmaash Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2007 Posts: 2,695	cam girls . com So camgirls.com does not rank for "cam girls" - lol! __________________ best cbd oil uk - Hit me up on ICQ 400607632

06-12-2016, 11:23 PM	#5
AdultKing Raise Your Weapon Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: Outback Australia Posts: 15,605	Graham Cooper. Complete nutjob. Dick Smith food extortionist refused bail https://gfy.com/members/cam_girls/ Seems he got himself banned again at some stage.

06-17-2016, 08:27 AM	#9
Badmaash Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2007 Posts: 2,695	He spent 0.5mil on that domain hope he made his money back?? __________________ best cbd oil uk - Hit me up on ICQ 400607632

06-17-2016, 09:18 AM	#10
bns666 Confirmed Fetishist Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Fetishland Posts: 11,521	as i remember, it was a $350k domain. that domain was #1 or very high for various "cam girls" keywords and phrases for a long time so even if it's banned now i guess he returned the investment and made profit. __________________ ⭐ CAM SODA ⭐ STRIPCHAT ⭐ ⭐ CHATURBATE ⭐ X LOVE CAM ⭐

06-17-2016, 09:21 AM	#11
vending_machine Confirmed User Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Seattle Posts: 1,062	If any of you had any idea what revenue that site pulls in you would be talking a different story.. whatever

06-17-2016, 11:58 AM	#13
bns666 Confirmed Fetishist Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Fetishland Posts: 11,521	@vending_machine btw, why is everyone forced to use streamate whois info on white label domains and camgirls.com has privacy turned on? __________________ ⭐ CAM SODA ⭐ STRIPCHAT ⭐ ⭐ CHATURBATE ⭐ X LOVE CAM ⭐

06-17-2016, 12:20 PM	#15
bns666 Confirmed Fetishist Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Fetishland Posts: 11,521	what difference does that make since anyone can own that domain either rick or graham, they require physical address and phone in whois info changed to them (streamate), even e-mail address doesn't have to be from streamate, but it can be from owner. __________________ ⭐ CAM SODA ⭐ STRIPCHAT ⭐ ⭐ CHATURBATE ⭐ X LOVE CAM ⭐

06-17-2016, 12:24 PM	#16
Barry-xlovecam It's 42 Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2010 Location: Global Posts: 18,083	Court Won't Order Google To Lift Manual Block For "Thin Content" \| ICF v. Google Welcome to the past -- this affected all white labels -- not just Streamate's ICF Technology, Inc. v. Google Inc., No. 2:2013cv02068 - Document 28 (W.D. Wash. 2013) :: Justia Thin content was the issue -- UNIQUE content is king