DNC and Hillary's Folder of Shame

[Jigster715]

Guccifer 2.0 seems to have delivered.
Trump may be Trump but Hillary certainly is Hillary Inc.

https://guccifer2.wordpress.com/2016...llary-clinton/

[Helix]

The DNC is backing what is without doubt the most corrupt politician I have seen in my lifetime. Even more fascinating is the willingness of the liberal leaders/voters to put the blinders on and ignore the data. Stunning.

[Joshua G]

Some of them even lurk here, claiming theres no evidence of anything, ever.

[Bladewire]

A hacker says he hacked it, it must be authentic. It takes a special kind of stupid to believe a thief, let alone a thief with an agenda.

[Jigster715]

Originally Posted by Bladewire

A hacker says he hacked it, it must be authentic. It takes a special kind of stupid to believe a thief, let alone a thief with an agenda.

That goes for Hillary as well.

I'd like to see Hillary's and the DNC mails and phone calls right about. No denying the hack so far. She must be ready to burst a vessel.

[Bladewire]

Originally Posted by Jigster715

That goes for Hillary as well.

I'd like to see Hillary's and the DNC mails and phone calls right about. No denying the hack so far. She must be ready to burst a vessel.

2 candidates for president. 1 is retarded, the other isn't. Much less, if anything, is expected from the retarded. People laugh and say "how cute! He's trying so hard!", while grilling the non retard and turning them inside out. Bush got elected that way.

Think about why a hacker wouldn't want Clinton president, because Trump will be WWIII and give them the anarchy they want. Bye bye making money online

[dyna mo]

yes, a hacker spent months and months creating fake official documents then did in fact, as recognized by the DNC, hack their shit, then published the fake docs claiming they were from the real hack.

that's some fancy hacker.

[ilnjscb]

Originally Posted by Helix

The DNC is backing what is without doubt the most corrupt politician I have seen in my lifetime. Even more fascinating is the willingness of the liberal leaders/voters to put the blinders on and ignore the data. Stunning.

How old are you? 10? Do you remember Iran Contra? The fact that there were NO WMD in Iraq?

You're surprised the DNC wants to back a winner? I have a pamphlet around here for you called "basic human nature" it will explain some things you'll need to know.

[Bladewire]

Originally Posted by ilnjscb

How old are you? 10? Do you remember Iran Contra? The fact that there were NO WMD in Iraq?

You're surprised the DNC wants to back a winner? I have a pamphlet around here for you called "basic human nature" it will explain some things you'll need to know.

All they do is pay Judicial Watch millions to file dozens of erroneous lawsuits then twist any new motion or lack of evidence they can as being corrupt.

Its telling when your platform us to do nothing in congress, delay, delay, delay and file fake lawsuits instead of making America the best it can be.

What is more disturbing is Americas enemies, and hackers, are supporting the GOP and Trump. People who want America to fail are helping the GOP and Trump.

Think about that, let it sink in.

[Hannes]

she's gone take this now, Trump fell off the bus

[ilnjscb]

Originally Posted by Bladewire

All they do is pay Judicial Watch millions to file dozens of erroneous lawsuits then twist any new motion or lack of evidence they can as being corrupt.

Its telling when your platform us to do nothing in congress, delay, delay, delay and file fake lawsuits instead of making America the best it can be.

What is more disturbing is Americas enemies, and hackers, are supporting the GOP and Trump. People who want America to fail are helping the GOP and Trump.

Think about that, let it sink in.

Not sure who the post above is denigrating? Who pays judicial watch?

[Joshua G]

Originally Posted by Bladewire

A hacker says he hacked it, it must be authentic. It takes a special kind of stupid to believe a thief, let alone a thief with an agenda.

Originally Posted by Bladewire

What is more disturbing is Americas enemies, and hackers, are supporting the GOP and Trump.

so in 1 breath you say the hacking story is bullshit, in the next you say the hackers support trump. sounds like the logic of a liberal who claims not to be one.

maybe you should make up your mind as to whats reality before posting. think about it, let it sink in.

[Joshua G]

Originally Posted by ilnjscb

How old are you? 10? Do you remember Iran Contra? The fact that there were NO WMD in Iraq?

You're surprised the DNC wants to back a winner? I have a pamphlet around here for you called "basic human nature" it will explain some things you'll need to know.

if helix is under 40, he has no memory of iran contra...& no WMD in Iraq was not corruption, it was incompetence by the president himself, stupidity, stubornness. his perceived motives were not in any way corrupt, just abysmally mis-guided. jesus freak. daddy issues. OK?

had you pointed out paul bremers rule in iraq...then you have a strong case for unbelievable corruption. but thats not what helix was talking about, as he was talking about a candidate in the running, & on that note, he's right, who has been more corrupt coming into the convention, since JFK?

[Joshua G]

upon more thinking, yes, the most corrupt presidential candidate since hilary, was bill 1996. hands down.

[Jigster715]

Originally Posted by Joshua G

upon more thinking, yes, the most corrupt presidential candidate since hilary, was bill 1996. hands down.

I'd like to take this moment to thank Slick Willy for:
NAFTA
Removal of Glass-Spiegel
and for putting the economy into a tail spin before handing the reigns over to Dumya which was like giving a boulder to a drowning man.

[Bladewire]

Originally Posted by ilnjscb

Not sure who the post above is denigrating? Who pays judicial watch?

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judicial_Watch

Far right wing conservative group, funded by the like, using abusive redundant litigation as a source of false propaganda etc.

[dyna mo]

it's impressive how you've uncovered that judicial watch has the FBI in their back pocket.

[Helix]

Hillary will stroke out again and drop.

[Speigelau]

[ilnjscb]

Yeah the presidency is worth hundreds of billions of dollars. And the supreme court ... It is worth the fight.

[crockett]

Originally Posted by dyna mo

yes, a hacker spent months and months creating fake official documents then did in fact, as recognized by the DNC, hack their shit, then published the fake docs claiming they were from the real hack.

that's some fancy hacker.

Actually the irony is in overload.. I remember quite well how many of the conservabros claimed the Snowden leaks were faked by the Russians.. They also vilified him for being a hacker but soon as a hacker comes along and hacks someone they hate it's suddenly different.

Guess it's ok to hack US govt files as long as the target is a Democrat.. Hillary is a bitch and a liar but the GFY conservabros are pretty fucking hypercritical.

I also find is funny the same conservabros will act all uppity when Hillary lies but wont bat an eye at the daily Trump lies.. Again dats different..

[Jigster715]

Originally Posted by crockett

Actually the irony is in overload.. I remember quite well how many of the conservabros claimed the Snowden leaks were faked by the Russians.. They also vilified him for being a hacker but soon as a hacker comes along and hacks someone they hate it's suddenly different.

Guess it's ok to hack US govt files as long as the target is a Democrat.. Hillary is a bitch and a liar but the GFY conservabros are pretty fucking hypercritical.

I also find is funny the same conservabros will act all uppity when Hillary lies but wont bat an eye at the daily Trump lies.. Again dats different..

Her lies are cool because her party provides welfare to you and all your chillins?
DNC is a political party. Not really .gov is it?
Both parties suck. Only sheep pick one.

[Jigster715]

Clinton?s email server ran without security software, new records reveal
https://www.rt.com/usa/347861-clinto...ware-security/

Hillary Clinton?s private server was temporarily unprotected by security features in December 2010, when the then-secretary of state had technical problems with her email. In 2011, Clinton?s server was hacked multiple times, newly-disclosed papers show.

On Wednesday, the legal advocacy group Judicial Watch published a batch of back-and-forth emails between high-level State Department technical support and Clinton staffers as they tried to fix a serious problem with the secretary?s private home email server.

According to December 2010 emails, one of Clinton's closest aides, Huma Abedin, reported that some people within the State Department, using the state.gov domain, were not receiving emails sent from the Clintons? private clintonemail.com server.

?There are many messages and responses not received,? one of the officials, Cindy Almodovar, wrote to S/ES-IRM staff, delivering Huma?s complaint.

Just a month before the email issue arose, in November 2010, Abedin and Clinton discussed that department employees were not receiving emails sent by then-secretary, the newly-released emails indicate.

?We should talk about putting you on state email or releasing your email address to the department so you are not going to spam,? Abedin wrote to Clinton on November 13, 2010.

In response, the secretary wrote: ?Let?s get separate address or device but I don?t want any risk of the personal being accessible.?

Another email shows that John Bentel, then the technical support director, warned Clinton that if she opted to use the official email box, ?any email would go through the Department?s infrastructure and subject to FOIA searches.?

After Abedin reported the technical problem, the State Department technical staff suggested that ?turning off the anti-spam filter? would resolve the problem.

However, after the Trend Micro Inc. security software installed on Clinton?s server was turned off, a senior State Department official, Thomas W. Lawrence, wrote: "We view this as a Band-Aid and fear it's not 100 percent fully effective. We are eager for TrendMicro to fully resolve, quickly.?

A screenshot of TrendMicro?s ?ScanMail for Exchange? in one of the emails showed the anti-spam disabled.

As shutting down the security software didn?t appear to be helpful, one email recommended turning off two of the three anti-phishing filters that protect personal data from identity thieves and cybercriminals ?in order to eliminate the categorizer.?

However, in his response, Lawrence did not support the idea, saying that both ?content-filtering and anti-virus checking? has blocked malicious content in the recent past.?

Another set of emails from January 2011, just mere weeks after attempts to fix Clinton?s email server, reveal that someone tried to compromise it.

?Someone was trying to hack us and while they did not get in i didnt [sic] want to let them have the chance to,? the non-departmental advisor to President Bill Clinton, who provided technical support, told the State Department?s deputy chief of staff for operations on January 9, 2011.

?We were attacked again so I shut [the server] down for a few min,? he wrote later that day.

More in link above...

[Paul Markham]

Originally Posted by Helix

The DNC is backing what is without doubt the most corrupt politician I have seen in my lifetime. Even more fascinating is the willingness of the liberal leaders/voters to put the blinders on and ignore the data. Stunning.

It comes as no surprise to anyone that Clinton is corrupt. Is she's less corrupt than Trump given the difference in power levels?

The US electoral system is corrupt. Delegate, super delegates, electoral colleges, and the money paid to buy the system. By a tiny few. An election should be on straight voter counts.

There should be a maximum a candidate can spend. A maximum of advertising, a maximum an individual or company can donate. Or it will get worse.

Will enough Americans vote for people who deliver the changes the country needs?

Today the UK has the biggest vote in 40 years. 95% of the establishment want the UK to Remain and have been preaching the benefits of Remaining. I predict 90% of the electorate will vote on what they experience. Which will lead to close 50% voting OUT.

The % may be out by a bit, but not that much. Do enough Americans have the guts to bust the system? Or just say your man is more corrupt than my man. Which is the situation for both of them.

No one can buy your vote, even though they think so.

[ilnjscb]

We all know the purpose of a political party is to create the appearance of supporting a cause while enriching the party elites by fleecing and manipulating the loyalists. The questions still remains, what are you going to do about it?