Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Post New Thread Reply

Register GFY Rules Calendar
Go Back   GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum > >
Discuss what's fucking going on, and which programs are best and worst. One-time "program" announcements from "established" webmasters are allowed.

 
Thread Tools
Old 07-02-2016, 02:14 AM   #1
wehateporn
Promoting Debate on GFY
 
wehateporn's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 27,173
The Dangers of Sunscreen

Sunscreens Exposed: 9 Surprising Truths


Sunscreens prevent sunburns, but beyond that simple fact surprisingly little is known about the safety and efficacy of these ubiquitous creams and sprays. EWG?s review of the latest research unearthed troubling facts that might tempt you to give up on sunscreens altogether. That?s not the right answer. Despite the unknowns about sunscreens? efficacy, public health agencies still recommend using them, just not as your first line of defense against the sun. At EWG we use sunscreens, but we look for shade, wear protective clothing and avoid the noontime sun before we smear on the cream. Here are the surprising facts:

1. There?s no consensus that sunscreens prevent skin cancer.

The FDA?s 2011 sunscreen rules allow sunscreen makers to advertise that using their products can decrease the risk of skin cancer and sun-related skin aging. But a wide range of public health agencies ? including the FDA ? have found very little evidence that sunscreen prevents most types of skin cancer. In reviewing the evidence, the FDA said that the available clinical studies ?do not demonstrate that even [broad spectrum products with SPF greater than 15] alone reduce the risk There?s no consensus that sunscreens prevent skin cancerof skin cancer and early skin aging.? The agency also said that it is ?not aware of any studies examining the effect of sunscreen use on the development of melanoma.? The International Agency for Research on Cancer recommends clothing, hats and shade as primary barriers to UV radiation. It says that ?sunscreens should not be the first choice for skin cancer prevention and should not be used as the sole agent for protection against the sun? (IARC 2001a).

2. There?s some evidence that sunscreens might increase the risk of the deadliest form of skin cancer for some people.

Some researchers have detected an increased risk of melanoma among sunscreen users. No one knows the cause, but scientists speculate that sunscreen users stay out in the sun longer and absorb more radiation overall, or that free radicals released as sunscreen chemicals break down in sunlight may play a role. One other hunch: Inferior sunscreens with poor UVA protection that have dominated the market for 30 years may have led to this surprising outcome. All major public health agencies still advise using sunscreens, but they also stress the importance of shade, clothing and timing.

3. There are dozens of high-SPF products ? but no proof they?re better.

The FDA has proposed prohibiting the sale of sunscreens with SPF values higher than ?50+.? The There are dozens of high-SPF products ? but no proof they?re betteragency has written that values higher than 50 would be ?misleading to the consumer,? given that there is an ?absence of data demonstrating additional clinical benefit? (FDA 2011a), and that ?there is no assurance that the specific values themselves are in fact truthful?? (FDA 2007). Scientists are also worried that high-SPF products may tempt people to stay in the sun too long, suppressing sunburns (a late, key warning of overexposure) while upping the risks of other kinds of skin damage.

Flouting the FDA?s proposed regulation, companies continue to sell high-SPF offerings in 2012. More than 1 in 7 products now lists SPF values higher than 50+, compared to only 1 in 8 in 2009, according to EWG?s analysis of more than 800 beach and sport sunscreens. Among the worst offenders are Walgreens and Aveeno brands. These manufacturers boast SPF values greater than 50+ on more than 40 percent of their sunscreens

4. Too little sun might be harmful, reducing the body?s vitamin D levels.

Sunshine serves a critical function in the body that sunscreen appears to inhibit ? producing vitamin The main source of vitamin D in the body is sunshine, and the compound is enormously important to health ? it strengthens bones and the immune system, reduces the risk of various cancers (including breast, colon, kidney and ovarian cancers) and regulates at least a thousand different genes governing virtually every tissue in the bodyD. The main source of vitamin D in the body is sunshine, and the compound is enormously important to health ? it strengthens bones and the immune system, reduces the risk of various cancers (including breast, colon, kidney and ovarian cancers) and regulates at least a thousand different genes governing virtually every tissue in the body (Mead 2008). About one-fourth of Americans have borderline low levels of vitamin D, and 8 percent have a serious deficiency (CDC 2012). Particular groups are at the highest risk ? breast-fed infants, people with darker skin and people who have limited sun exposure (NIH 2012).

Some people can make enough vitamin D from 10 to 15 minutes of unprotected sun exposure several times a week. But many others cannot. The right amount depends on the individual?s age, skin tone, the intensity of sunlight, time outdoors and skin cancer risk. Check with your doctor to see if you should get a vitamin D test or if you should take seasonal or year-round supplements.

5. The common sunscreen ingredient vitamin A may speed development of cancer.

Recently available data from an FDA study indicate that a form of vitamin A, retinyl palmitate, may speed the development of skin tumors and lesions when applied to skin in the presence of sunlight (NTP 2009). This evidence is troubling, because the sunscreen industry adds vitamin A to 25 percent of all sunscreens.

Quote:
According to a report by AOL News, about half of the sunscreens tested contained vitamin A ingredients and derivatives like retinol and retinyl palmitate, which FDA?s own studies have shown are photocarcinogenic, meaning they become toxic when exposed to sunlight. In fact, an older FDA report explains that sunscreens containing vitamin A ingredients cause tumors and lesions to develop and spread 21 percent faster than sunscreens that do not contain vitamin A ingredients.
The industry puts vitamin A in its formulations because it is an anti-oxidant that slows skin aging. That may be true for lotions and night creams used indoors, but the FDA recently conducted a the FDA recently conducted a study of vitamin A?s photocarcinogenic properties ? the possibility that it can promote cancerous tumors when used on skin exposed to sunlight. study of vitamin A?s photocarcinogenic properties ? the possibility that it can promote cancerous tumors when used on skin exposed to sunlight. Scientists have known for some time that vitamin A can spur excess skin growth (hyperplasia) and that in sunlight it can form free radicals that damage DNA.

In the FDA?s one-year study, tumors and lesions developed sooner in lab animals coated in a vitamin A-laced cream than animals treated with a vitamin-free cream. Both groups were exposed to the equivalent of just nine minutes of maximum intensity sunlight each day.

It?s an ironic twist for an industry already battling studies that have questioned whether their products protect against skin cancer. The FDA data are preliminary, but if they hold up in the final assessment, sunscreen makers have a big problem. In the meantime, EWG recommends that consumers avoid sunscreens with vitamin A (look for ?retinyl palmitate? or ?retinol? on the label).

Continued Sunscreens Exposed: 9 Surprising Truths : In5D Esoteric, Metaphysical, and Spiritual Database
__________________
wehateporn is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2016, 02:22 AM   #2
MiamiBoyz
fgfdftre6
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: In the closet with your dad!
Posts: 6,690
MiamiBoyz is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2016, 03:09 AM   #3
pimpmaster9000
Too lazy to set a custom title
 
pimpmaster9000's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 26,732
and water does not cure thirst
__________________
Report a suspicious cracker: Click Here
pimpmaster9000 is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2016, 03:20 AM   #4
CurrentlySober
Too lazy to wipe my ass
 
CurrentlySober's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: A Public Bathroom
Posts: 38,536
Yup, they are pretty dangerous. I drank 3 bottles in little under half an hour one time, I sure felt sick afterwards. Ban Tasty Sunscreen !!!
__________________


👁️ 👍️ 💩
CurrentlySober is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2016, 03:45 AM   #5
AdultKing
Raise Your Weapon
 
AdultKing's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Outback Australia
Posts: 15,601
AdultKing is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2016, 01:52 PM   #6
JamesM83
Confirmed User
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Montreal, Canada
Posts: 334
That's about as accurate as saying "take Advil, it'll cure your headache!" but for some it won't. Different results on different people!
JamesM83 is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2016, 01:56 PM   #7
arock10
Confirmed User
 
arock10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,218
Thanks for this useless public disservice announcement
__________________
Sup
arock10 is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2016, 02:05 PM   #8
Hannes
Confirmed User
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 1,594
they're stealing my money, its fine am a zillionaire
__________________
Skype: gallag97
Email: [U]comingsoon/U]
Hannes is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2016, 07:37 PM   #9
Scott McD
Too lazy to set a custom title
 
Scott McD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Posts: 67,795
I think i need to use it somehow...
__________________


I Buy My High Quality Traffic Here, You Should Too!

Scott McD is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2016, 09:48 PM   #10
Harambe
So Fucking Banned
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: The Zoo
Posts: 557
rough on fur
Harambe is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Post New Thread Reply
Go Back   GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum > >

Bookmarks

Tags
skin, vitamin, sunscreens, sunscreen, fda, cancer, risk, sunlight, sun, exposed, products, people, health, values, tumors, high-spf, surprising, body, studies, study, fda?s, percent, cancers, evidence, industry



Advertising inquiries - marketing at gfy dot com

Contact Admin - Advertise - GFY Rules - Top

©2000-, AI Media Network Inc



Powered by vBulletin
Copyright © 2000- Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.