Google continues to refine it's service. - GoFuckYourself.com

Paul Markham · 11-15-2016, 12:37 AM

Google and Facebook Take Aim at Fake-News Sites.

Quote:

Facebook Inc. and Alphabet Inc.?s Google announced steps to prevent fake-news websites from generating revenue through their ad-selling services, signs that technology companies are moving to address a growing controversy about misinformation on the internet.

Google got to the top and stayed there by giving the best deal they could to surfers.

Yow will this reflect your business?

Long term I suspect most bloggers relying on Google and webmastering will have to find a new job.

ContentBay · 11-15-2016, 01:23 AM

Thank God, those fuckers are causing so much confusion, my nephew thinks 2Pac is actually in Aruba...

MFCT · 11-15-2016, 01:42 AM

I guess that's bad news for CNN.

stoka · 11-15-2016, 01:43 AM

it's "its"

Paul Markham · 11-15-2016, 02:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stoka

it's "its"

DraX · 11-15-2016, 02:26 AM

Couldn't read the whole story...

but more interestingly to me how do they define a fake news site?

To me if a blog have readers and posts unique valuable views, then what is the problem...

MiamiBoyz · 11-15-2016, 03:24 AM

So are they blocking all government run websites then?

If they want real news and not just propaganda and lies they should.

Mediamix · 11-15-2016, 03:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ContentBay

Thank God, those fuckers are causing so much confusion, my nephew thinks 2Pac is actually in Aruba...

Tdash · 11-15-2016, 04:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DraX

but more interestingly to me how do they define a fake news site?

It's code word for marginalizing alternative news media.
They want the "sheeple" to get their news only from the mainstream media.

j3rkules · 11-15-2016, 04:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DraX

Couldn't read the whole story...

but more interestingly to me how do they define a fake news site?

Yes, that is an interesting point. I bet the sites with the poor backlink profiles...

Barry-xlovecam · 11-15-2016, 04:51 AM

Facebook, Google bar fake-news sites from their ad networks - MarketWatch

Facebook, Google To Crack Hard On Fake News Websites | Special Report News Journal,Stocks News

This is about barring deceptive Facebook ads for fake news -- clickbait for pages with Adsense on them. Intent to deceive for monetary gain.

It's not about banning CNN or Breitbart -- news media you don't agree with.

Define: False reports of facts -- not opinions.

If I advertise that "the DJI lost 3,000 points today" and then have a page selling prepper supplies with Adsense on it < this would be one outrageous example.

CarlosTheGaucho · 11-15-2016, 05:05 AM

Comes of as a very credible move since WikiLeaks proved Google was for example recently involved with "profiling" voters for the HRC camp while 94 pct. of MSM was in HRC's campaign pocket.

Where does one draw the line what is fake or what not?
Since we now know that "official" is no longer a viable information.

https://twitter.com/wikileaks

Perhaps it will at least help to initiate a discussion about what is even considered "journalism" today.

Barry-xlovecam · 11-15-2016, 05:28 AM

Ok Carlos -- wikileaks and infowars are factual news sources LMAO

If you put a pile of shit in a bag and tie it with a red ribbon -- it's still a bag of shit.

Nobody is banning political opinion. I gave an example above.

CarlosTheGaucho · 11-15-2016, 05:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Barry-xlovecam

Ok Carlos -- wikileaks and infowars are factual news sources LMAO

If you put a pile of shit in a bag and tie it with a red ribbon -- it's still a bag of shit.

Not sure what you're trying to accomplish by the InfoWars mention.

Is a news source that releases actual original documents a factual news? Or not even that?

I'm afraid your (non-)argumentation holds no ground.

Paul Markham · 11-15-2016, 05:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DraX

Couldn't read the whole story...

but more interestingly to me how do they define a fake news site?

To me if a blog have readers and posts unique valuable views, then what is the problem...

The problem is whether or not the surfers like it.

We've all searched for something and landed on useless sites. some because they don't do it quite as we want and others because they use keywords to get traffic to make people click on links that open ads.

Your blog posts might tick the boxes for Google, but Google is more interested in it ticking surfers boxes. This it might judge by how fast surfers return. The future is for those that satisfy surfers needs.

cocksucker mcgee · 11-15-2016, 12:39 PM

It's LOL

11-15-2016, 01:23 AM	#2
ContentBay Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2015 Location: Online Posts: 393	Thank God, those fuckers are causing so much confusion, my nephew thinks 2Pac is actually in Aruba... __________________ Skype: Contentbay Telegram: @Contentbay E-mail: [email protected] For Writing Services https://gfy.com/gfy-jobs-and-service...easy-step.html

11-15-2016, 01:42 AM	#3
MFCT Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2015 Posts: 1,489	I guess that's bad news for CNN. __________________ Keeping you abreast of the teens that get undressed. Girls By Location - Couples By Location - Guys By Location - Trans By Location

11-15-2016, 02:26 AM	#6
DraX Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: In wonderland.. Posts: 7,147	Couldn't read the whole story... but more interestingly to me how do they define a fake news site? To me if a blog have readers and posts unique valuable views, then what is the problem... __________________ Deposit Today With BTC - Play With Bitcoins

11-15-2016, 05:05 AM	#12
CarlosTheGaucho Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2005 Posts: 9,510	Comes of as a very credible move since WikiLeaks proved Google was for example recently involved with "profiling" voters for the HRC camp while 94 pct. of MSM was in HRC's campaign pocket. Where does one draw the line what is fake or what not? Since we now know that "official" is no longer a viable information. https://twitter.com/wikileaks Perhaps it will at least help to initiate a discussion about what is even considered "journalism" today. __________________ CTG Media \| skype: carlosprague \| cb \|at\| ctgmedia \|dot\| net \| Want to make more with your Dating Traffic? \| Read My Educational Series \| Read my Adult Biz Chronicles \| Did your ad revenue drop by 40 pct. or more last year?

11-15-2016, 01:43 AM	#4
stoka Confirmed User Join Date: Dec 2005 Posts: 956	it's "its"

11-15-2016, 03:24 AM	#7
MiamiBoyz fgfdftre6 Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2012 Location: In the closet with your dad! Posts: 6,690	So are they blocking all government run websites then? If they want real news and not just propaganda and lies they should.

11-15-2016, 04:51 AM	#11
Barry-xlovecam It's 42 Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2010 Location: Global Posts: 18,083	Facebook, Google bar fake-news sites from their ad networks - MarketWatch Facebook, Google To Crack Hard On Fake News Websites \| Special Report News Journal,Stocks News This is about barring deceptive Facebook ads for fake news -- clickbait for pages with Adsense on them. Intent to deceive for monetary gain. It's not about banning CNN or Breitbart -- news media you don't agree with. Define: False reports of facts -- not opinions. If I advertise that "the DJI lost 3,000 points today" and then have a page selling prepper supplies with Adsense on it < this would be one outrageous example.

11-15-2016, 05:28 AM	#13
Barry-xlovecam It's 42 Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2010 Location: Global Posts: 18,083	Ok Carlos -- wikileaks and infowars are factual news sources LMAO If you put a pile of shit in a bag and tie it with a red ribbon -- it's still a bag of shit. Nobody is banning political opinion. I gave an example above.

11-15-2016, 12:39 PM	#16
cocksucker mcgee Registered User Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2016 Posts: 92	It's LOL