If hilary wasnt even more rotten than trump, tonight supreme court would have gone democrat

[Joshua G]

must be quite a painful moment, watching the supreme court stay conservative.

but it didnt have to be, dumb libs. If hilary just spent a day in wisconson instead of dozens of days in hollywood, tonight the supreme court would have gone democrat.

too bad so sad, libs.

[kane]

Or if the Republican party hadn't been a bunch of whining little assholes it would have gone Democrat almost a year ago when Obama nominated Garland.

[mineistaken]

God forbid any country from libbies in charge. US was saved.

[mineistaken]

Originally Posted by kane

Or if the Republican party hadn't been a bunch of whining little assholes it would have gone Democrat almost a year ago when Obama nominated Garland.

As if majority democrat would have confirmed conservative choice.

Double standard much?

[Joshua G]

Originally Posted by kane

Or if the Republican party hadn't been a bunch of whining little assholes it would have gone Democrat almost a year ago when Obama nominated Garland.

in what world would the GOP senate have confirmed garland? who specifically on the GOP senate do you think woulda supported him.

[mineistaken]

Most transparent judicial selection process in history



Full video of MAGA action:

[kane]

Originally Posted by mineistaken

As if majority democrat would have confirmed conservative choice.

Double standard much?

We can "what if" until we are blue in the face. The fact is a vacancy came up on the Supreme Court, the President put forth a nominee and the opposition party refused to even hold hearings and discuss it.

As an aside, during G.W. Bush's presidency, he nominated two different Supreme Court justices. Roberts got 78 votes while the Republicans only held a 51-48 majority in the Senate. Alito got 58 votes while the Republicans held a 55-44 majority. So Democrats have voted to confirm Conservative nominees in the very recent past.

[onwebcam]

A man was murdered for nothing.

[mineistaken]

Originally Posted by kane

So Democrats have voted to confirm Conservative nominees in the very recent past.

In both cases republicans had the majority anyway.
Completely different thing.

[kane]

Originally Posted by Joshua G

in what world would the GOP senate have confirmed garland? who specifically on the GOP senate do you think woulda supported him.

I don't know that they would have confirmed him. Maybe they would have, maybe not. The fact is they refused to even hold hearings or have a vote.

[kane]

Originally Posted by mineistaken

In both cases republicans had the majority anyway.
Completely different thing.

If the Senate had been controlled by Democrats they may or may not have confirmed him. In the end 22 of the 44 Democrats voted to confirm Roberts. To me, that shows they were willing to listen and vote for someone they felt was qualified. The Republicans didn't even give Garland the opportunity to speak for himself or face a vote.

[Bladewire]

Originally Posted by mineistaken

Most transparent judicial selection process in history

Full video of MAGA action

What are you doing to make Slovakia great again? Just curious. We appreciate your effort in supporting America's #1 place as world superpower

[Joshua G]

Originally Posted by kane

I don't know that they would have confirmed him. Maybe they would have, maybe not. The fact is they refused to even hold hearings or have a vote.

yep. politics is very polarized today.

i didnt know this until he resigned, but obama installed a border patrol director that had no experience at the job. WTF was that?

nobody has any high roads in our politics today. the sides dont even attempt to meet. im simply happy we will have a working government again. one that makes hard leftists squirm in pain as their taker infrastructure gets torn down.

no more flooding illegal immigrants to turn red states blue. Libs whine about gerrymandering & say nothing about mexicanizing our southern states to tilt power to liberals. too bad there were no illegals in wisconsin. too cold for latinos.

[mineistaken]

Originally Posted by kane

If the Senate had been controlled by Democrats they may or may not have confirmed him. In the end 22 of the 44 Democrats voted to confirm Roberts. To me, that shows they were willing to listen and vote for someone they felt was qualified. The Republicans didn't even give Garland the opportunity to speak for himself or face a vote.

Not the same situations at all!

They voted in the case where republicans already had it in the bag as they had the majority in any case!

In that case it would be even calculatedly smart decision for some democrats to vote YES, so that they could get some brownie points and claim they were supportive of republicans and maybe expect to get the favor back etc.
Or at least get people like you praising that and not seeing the COMPLETE different situation between voting opposition when they have majority ANYWAY and voting opposition when you are the majority.

I mean seriously, how is that I need to explain this obvious major major diference?

[mineistaken]

Originally Posted by Bladewire

What are you doing to make Slovakia great again? Just curious. We appreciate your support in supporting America's #1 place as world superpower

I am starting with creating few jobs in my small business. And you are welcome.

[kane]

Originally Posted by mineistaken

Not the same situations at all!

They voted in the case where republicans already had it in the bag as they had the majority in any case!

In that case it would be even calculatedly smart decision for some democrats to vote YES, so that they could get some brownie points and claim they were supportive of republicans and maybe expect to get the favor back etc.
Or at least get people like you praising that and not seeing the COMPLETE different situation between voting opposition when they have majority ANYWAY and voting opposition when you are the majority.

I mean seriously, how is that I need to explain this obvious major major diference?

None of this changes the fact that the Republicans didn't even give Garland the courtesy of having a hearing and a vote.

We can speculate all day what the Democrats may or may not have done if they were in power, but it doesn't change what happened.

[Bladewire]

Originally Posted by mineistaken

I am starting with creating few jobs in my small business. And you are welcome.

I like this! We are both businessmen. What kind of business? (not political talk no attacks)

[beerptrol]

If the republicans weren't so corrupt and anti american they would have allowed Obama to select the judge like he was entitled to do

[beerptrol]

Originally Posted by mineistaken

I am starting with creating few jobs in my small business. And you are welcome.

Swinging off of Trump's nuts and being a paid russian anti american troll classifies as a small business?

[Bladewire]

Originally Posted by beerptrol

If the republicans weren't so corrupt and anti american they would have allowed Obama to select the judge like he was entitled to do

Obama did select a judge, a judge Republicans previously approved, but because it was a black man resubmitting a previously approved judge, they refused to hold confirmation hearings for a year, until the black man was out of office. Dirty Republicans

[JohnnyClips - BANNED FOR LIFE]

I wonder if Cuck Schumer will shed some fake tears tonight LOL