Muslim Schoolgirls Sing 'Insha Allah' Song at St. Pauls Cathedral

[Sarn]

Meanwhile in the UK

[BaldBastard]

It was a multi denominational memorial service for the victims of the Grenfell Tower fire..

what part of that don't you fucking get?

"The service reflected the multicultural character of the Grenfell community, with Christian and Muslim prayers and music from Middle Eastern, Caribbean and Western traditions."

Can you link us to the Caribbean communities songs they sung?

And of course you cant because that does not fit your agenda or at least the agenda of the numbfuks that trigger your propaganda drunk brain.


The actual story..


Grenfell Tower fire: Survivors, Royal family attend memorial service for victims - ABC News (Australian Broadcasting Corporation)

[MiamiBoyz]

[beerptrol]

Stick with what you do best. Gloryholing bums for dick cheese

Originally Posted by Sarn

Meanwhile in the UK

[pimpmaster9000]

and somebody wore a batman tshirt at a superman movie

there is nothing more important in the world today than what imaginary friends in the sky rituals you follow!

[NatalieK]

lovely to hear these Muslim girls find in their heart to sing in a cathedral for those whose died. I´m sure other religions also sung this day.

[mineistaken]

Originally Posted by MrBaldBastard

It was a multi denominational memorial service for the victims of the Grenfell Tower fire..

what part of that don't you fucking get?

"The service reflected the multicultural character of the Grenfell community, with Christian and Muslim prayers and music from Middle Eastern, Caribbean and Western traditions."

Can you link us to the Caribbean communities songs they sung?

And of course you cant because that does not fit your agenda or at least the agenda of the numbfuks that trigger your propaganda drunk brain.


The actual story..


Grenfell Tower fire: Survivors, Royal family attend memorial service for victims - ABC News (Australian Broadcasting Corporation)

If bigger part of the building was occupied by enrichers, why not hold it in mosque and invite Christian girls to sing there?

Could it be because muslims are not so "accepting" (in terms of Christian songs in mosque)?

[dillfly2000]

Originally Posted by Sarn

Meanwhile in the UK

all I see are dead eyes

[mineistaken]

Originally Posted by dillfly2000

all I see are dead eyes

dass waciss

[BaldBastard]

Originally Posted by mineistaken

If bigger part of the building was occupied by enrichers, why not hold it in mosque and invite Christian girls to sing there?

Could it be because muslims are not so "accepting" (in terms of Christian songs in mosque)?

Mosque's around London held multi denominational services, the one you linked was just the biggest as it was organised by the British Government, with Royal family in attendance. Grenfell Tower National Memorial Service

So.. just to prove you have not been played by the propaganda merchants, produce a link to the Caribbean choir that sang.

setup.. clucked and triggered. write that on your forehead ok.

[just a punk]

Originally Posted by Sarn

Meanwhile in the UK

And what's wrong with that? Muslims and Christians believe in the same god... the Jewish one: Abrahamic religion - Simple English Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[CarlosTheGaucho]

Originally Posted by CyberSEO

And what's wrong with that? Muslims and Christians believe in the same god... the Jewish one: Abrahamic religion - Simple English Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This may sound technically true, since the early, Meccan part of the Qu'ran is widely plagiarized from the Old Testament, and even mentions several characters present in the Judeo-Christian theology. So a follower of Islam can claim this and it will be in accordance with the Qu'ran, however, there is more to it.

The "People of the book" is the term used in the Islamic doctrine for the Jews and Christians. These indeed have a special status in the doctrine of Islam, they can live under Islamic rule, as long as they accept Islam as the final, universal, true word of god and Mohammad to be the final prophet. The Qu'ran even goes as far as to claim that the Jesus was a Muslim.

These can, according to the Islamic doctrine, either 1) convert 2) become a dhimmi - a second class citizen with very limited rights, that is supposed to pay Jizyah (special tax for "protection") 3) die.

Polytheists or pagans have, according to the doctrine, only two options - to convert or to die.

Actually there was, historically, yet another option - a frequent practice of slavery, following the example of the prophet Muhammad who was a slave trader himself. This has been widespread, on a massive scale, in Africa and Meditteranean.

The original business of slavery was conducted by Islamic slave traders, and the only way for a slave to free himself was to convert. Ever wondered about the origins of Islam in Sub Saharan Africa? These are, in the vast majority the descendants of slaves that converted. Slavery was a powerful tool in order to spread Islam.

There is always plenty of buzzwords that are spread by those who are not familiar with the doctrine, or by the apologists for Islam, and are widely accepted and recited, since it makes people feel good. But there's usually also a second side to the story.

[MiamiBoyz]

[TheDynasty]

hahahahah

[2MuchMark]

Originally Posted by GspotProductions

lovely to hear these Muslim girls find in their heart to sing in a cathedral for those whose died. I´m sure other religions also sung this day.

[PR_Glen]

Originally Posted by CarlosTheGaucho

This may sound technically true, since the early, Meccan part of the Qu'ran is widely plagiarized from the Old Testament, and even mentions several characters present in the Judeo-Christian theology. So a follower of Islam can claim this and it will be in accordance with the Qu'ran, however, there is more to it.

The "People of the book" is the term used in the Islamic doctrine for the Jews and Christians. These indeed have a special status in the doctrine of Islam, they can live under Islamic rule, as long as they accept Islam as the final, universal, true word of god and Mohammad to be the final prophet. The Qu'ran even goes as far as to claim that the Jesus was a Muslim.

These can, according to the Islamic doctrine, either 1) convert 2) become a dhimmi - a second class citizen with very limited rights, that is supposed to pay Jizyah (special tax for "protection") 3) die.

Polytheists or pagans have, according to the doctrine, only two options - to convert or to die.

Actually there was, historically, yet another option - a frequent practice of slavery, following the example of the prophet Muhammad who was a slave trader himself. This has been widespread, on a massive scale, in Africa and Meditteranean.

The original business of slavery was conducted by Islamic slave traders, and the only way for a slave to free himself was to convert. Ever wondered about the origins of Islam in Sub Saharan Africa? These are, in the vast majority the descendants of slaves that converted. Slavery was a powerful tool in order to spread Islam.

There is always plenty of buzzwords that are spread by those who are not familiar with the doctrine, or by the apologists for Islam, and are widely accepted and recited, since it makes people feel good. But there's usually also a second side to the story.

So there isn't acts of intolerance, isolation and violence in the old testament and torah by comparison? is that what you are implying? Because that would be blatantly false.

The truth is all forms of religions are written in absolutes and are removed of tolerance for a reason, they are trying to recruit by division to obtain more followers. The stupid part is the fact that people today, even the ones who follow no religion, can use others beliefs for reason to hate them by cherry picking their texts and in the process form their own form of religion of non believers instead. All your missing is a book and a hang out every sunday.

I instead choose to let people be who they are and my only enemy are those whom attack me--which, so far, has yet to happen.

[JesseQuinn]

Originally Posted by dillfly2000

all I see are dead eyes

is that a pumpkins or wifi ref? both are such good tracks

whatever, I see a bunch of young, vibrant girls and if I could I would hug them so hard and reinforce that they already possess everything needed to be amazing. being real their music was beautiful. as are they, and their eyes.

Brown girls who scare adult white males confuses me, also makes me feel like something is happening. in a good way.

resist

and love to everyone who loves people

[Sarn]

Originally Posted by MiamiBoyz

[2MuchMark]

Originally Posted by JesseQuinn

is that a pumpkins or wifi ref? both are such good tracks

whatever, I see a bunch of young, vibrant girls and if I could I would hug them so hard and reinforce that they already possess everything needed to be amazing. being real their music was beautiful. as are they, and their eyes.

Brown girls who scare adult white males confuses me, also makes me feel like something is happening. in a good way.

resist

and love to everyone who loves people

[Paul Markham]

Originally Posted by MrBaldBastard

It was a multi denominational memorial service for the victims of the Grenfell Tower fire..

what part of that don't you fucking get?

"The service reflected the multicultural character of the Grenfell community, with Christian and Muslim prayers and music from Middle Eastern, Caribbean and Western traditions."

Can you link us to the Caribbean communities songs they sung?

And of course you cant because that does not fit your agenda or at least the agenda of the numbfuks that trigger your propaganda drunk brain.


The actual story..


Grenfell Tower fire: Survivors, Royal family attend memorial service for victims - ABC News (Australian Broadcasting Corporation)

When was there a referendum by the British people asking for multi-culturalism?

[Paul Markham]

Originally Posted by CarlosTheGaucho

This may sound technically true, since the early, Meccan part of the Qu'ran is widely plagiarized from the Old Testament, and even mentions several characters present in the Judeo-Christian theology. So a follower of Islam can claim this and it will be in accordance with the Qu'ran, however, there is more to it.

The "People of the book" is the term used in the Islamic doctrine for the Jews and Christians. These indeed have a special status in the doctrine of Islam, they can live under Islamic rule, as long as they accept Islam as the final, universal, true word of god and Mohammad to be the final prophet. The Qu'ran even goes as far as to claim that the Jesus was a Muslim.

These can, according to the Islamic doctrine, either 1) convert 2) become a dhimmi - a second class citizen with very limited rights, that is supposed to pay Jizyah (special tax for "protection") 3) die.

Polytheists or pagans have, according to the doctrine, only two options - to convert or to die.

Actually there was, historically, yet another option - a frequent practice of slavery, following the example of the prophet Muhammad who was a slave trader himself. This has been widespread, on a massive scale, in Africa and Meditteranean.

The original business of slavery was conducted by Islamic slave traders, and the only way for a slave to free himself was to convert. Ever wondered about the origins of Islam in Sub Saharan Africa? These are, in the vast majority the descendants of slaves that converted. Slavery was a powerful tool in order to spread Islam.

There is always plenty of buzzwords that are spread by those who are not familiar with the doctrine, or by the apologists for Islam, and are widely accepted and recited, since it makes people feel good. But there's usually also a second side to the story.

No need to look at historical evidence of how Islam conducts itself. One only has to read the news.

[Paul Markham]

Originally Posted by PR_Glen

So there isn't acts of intolerance, isolation and violence in the old testament and torah by comparison? is that what you are implying? Because that would be blatantly false.

The truth is all forms of religions are written in absolutes and are removed of tolerance for a reason, they are trying to recruit by division to obtain more followers. The stupid part is the fact that people today, even the ones who follow no religion, can use others beliefs for reason to hate them by cherry picking their texts and in the process form their own form of religion of non believers instead. All your missing is a book and a hang out every sunday.

I instead choose to let people be who they are and my only enemy are those whom attack me--which, so far, has yet to happen.

So because we had religious wars 500 years ago. Should we accept them today?

Your logic is flawed.

[Paul Markham]

Originally Posted by JesseQuinn

is that a pumpkins or wifi ref? both are such good tracks

whatever, I see a bunch of young, vibrant girls and if I could I would hug them so hard and reinforce that they already possess everything needed to be amazing. being real their music was beautiful. as are they, and their eyes.

Brown girls who scare adult white males confuses me, also makes me feel like something is happening. in a good way.

resist

and love to everyone who loves people

I'm not scared of brown girls. It's the males who dominate the religion. Hug those girls and you might upset the Fathers, Brothers, Cousins.

[CarlosTheGaucho]

Originally Posted by PR_Glen

So there isn't acts of intolerance, isolation and violence in the old testament and torah by comparison? is that what you are implying? Because that would be blatantly false.

The truth is all forms of religions are written in absolutes and are removed of tolerance for a reason, they are trying to recruit by division to obtain more followers. The stupid part is the fact that people today, even the ones who follow no religion, can use others beliefs for reason to hate them by cherry picking their texts and in the process form their own form of religion of non believers instead. All your missing is a book and a hang out every sunday.

I instead choose to let people be who they are and my only enemy are those whom attack me--which, so far, has yet to happen.

It's perhaps safe to say that the Old Testament may as well be the worst book ever produced, on so many levels. I am sure none of us would be glad if the world would run based on the Old Testament, or if there were organized groups that live according to it and put it into practice.

It also includes a great deal of violence, however, there are two important points from the doctrinal point of view:

1) the violence included in the Old Testament is not prescriptive (aka it's not explicitly codified as something you should do and emulate in your regular life)
2) more importantly, The old testament has been abrogated by the New Testament

One can have all the objections in the world towards The Church, they are an incredibly hypocritical, destructive and thieving force throughout the history. However, from the doctrinal point of view - one would probably find it hard to object to the core content of the New Testament, to something like ten commandments. It is actually the core of what we in the western civilization understand as morality, many may have never realized that.

A great deal of the world, however, at this stage, 1400 years since its inception, runs based on an entirely different moral and belief system - the Islamic doctrine.

If I understand well, the other part of your reply refers to people who use someone else's religion as a point of division. I completely agree that this is not right, after all one of the essential liberal values is freedom of conscience and religion, everybody can practice anything as long as it doesn't threaten the freedom of others.

However, if you tried to apply this liberal value to the doctrine of Islam, you will find one crucial and essential issue.

What we understand as a definition of religion would be say a certain belief and set of rules that extends to its followers. Christianity deals with how to he a good Christian, Hinduism how to be a good Hindu etc. So it's logical that a person that is not familiar with the Islamic doctrine may ask - why should the doctrine of Islam be of any interest to us, if we are not a part of it?

The reason why is since we are in fact a part of the doctrine of Islam. That is the one, crucial difference, its doctrine extends to you, to me, to everybody outside of it. A great deal of the doctrine of Islam, in fact about a half of it, is concerned with not how to be a follower of Islam, but how to deal with the Kuffir aka the unbeliever and how to spread Islam.

The Kaffir can be treated well (especially if he is of value for Islam or if Islam is too weak to rule over him) or he can be treated very, very badly. According to the doctrine of Islam, a Kuffir can be relegated towards the second class citizen status with little to no rights (dhimmi), he can be deceived and lied to, he can be enslaved, raped, tortured, killed.

The Kuffir (unbelievers) are seen as "the worst of creatures", Allah "hates the Kaffir", and the world that is not ruled by Islam (Dar al Harb - "The house of war") is seen as a world ruled by dissent and as an opposition.

How does one call a system that plots on how to deal with its opposition and achieve power and dominance? That is a political system.

So the doctrine of Islam is different to any other religion. Because it is not a religion, it is also a political system, and it is the political part that that has made Islam successful.

In fact it's only those outside of Islam who define Islam as a "religion" - if you'd go to the Middle East, and asked on the street, and if you received a honest answer, it is likely it would be that Islam is a complete way of life.

"I instead choose to let people be who they are and my only enemy are those whom attack me--which, so far, has yet to happen."

This is again you seeing this through a western prisma, do onto others as you wish they would do upon you - The Golden Rule. This is the morality a westerner applies to the world, he treats all humanity the same.

No such thing exists in Islam though, there is pluralistic ethics - different moral rules apply to different groups - there are different morals applied to the believers (Ummah), and different moral rules on how to treat those outside of Islam (Kuffir).

[bronco67]

At least they were allowed to go to school...you know, because they're not in the middle east.

[CarlosTheGaucho]

Originally Posted by bronco67

At least they were allowed to go to school...you know, because they're not in the middle east.

Unfortunately, it is not that unlikely that they are about to attend, even here in the West, an Islamic school.

Here's a 9 minute excerpt from a documentary where Richard Dawkins visits an Islamic school in Leicester only to discover that all of 100 pct. of its pupils believe that the Qu'Ran is the evidence of science and a good source of scientific information, incl. the shape of Earth (The Earth is flat in the Qu'Ran) or that the salt water won't mix with fresh water.

[Paul Markham]

This is an example of what liberals call "integration".

They sang an Islamic song in a Christian icon, wore head scarves and full dresses, some will be forced to marry men on their parents choosing, no Christians were in the choir, they don't mix with other children.

This has always been the way of liberal integration. Whites accepting the standards of migrants and migrants never bending their standards.

[klinton]

Originally Posted by Sarn

COMRADES ! let the spirit of Yurij Andropov will be with you. my dear western friends

MEANWHILE IN RUSSIA: SARN COMMUTING TO WORK, LIKE EVERY MORNING: