Tump supporters say there is no proof of collusion or no proof of this or that.

[Steve Rupe]

Trump haters say there is proof of collusion or proof of this or that.

What there is proof of is there is an ongoing investigation and until that investigation ends no one knows what proof there is or lack thereof about anything.

Until the Special Prosecutor ends his investigation all any one, including the media, can do is speculate.

[Acepimp]

There's also proof that Hillary paid for the dossier of false info to smear Trump, get a warrant to spy on him under false pretenses, and attempt to influence the election.

[Steve Rupe]

Originally Posted by Acepimp

There's also proof that Hillary paid for the dossier of false info to smear Trump, get a warrant to spy on him under false pretenses, and attempt to influence the election.

Hillary is past history and a wantna be. I do not give two cents about Hillary. If she committed crimes I am assuming she will be charged and appear in a court of law and have to pay the consequences. If not then she won't. She is not a player so I for one do not give a fuck what happens or does not happen to Hillary.

[kane]

Originally Posted by Steve Rupe

Trump haters say there is proof of collusion or proof of this or that.

What there is proof of is there is an ongoing investigation and until that investigation ends no one knows what proof there is or lack thereof about anything.

Until the Special Prosecutor ends his investigation all any one, including the media, can do is speculate.

Last night (or maybe the night before) Tucker Carlson on Fox News came back from break, looked right at the camera and said something like, "With zero evidence of Russian collusion, Mueller's investigation should be winding down."

That's fake news. Nobody knows what Mueller may or may not have. All we know is what has been leaked, released, or assumed and that isn't much. Until Mueller releases his findings we won't know for sure what he has and what he doesn't. Arguing about it is worthless.

[Acepimp]

Originally Posted by kane

Last night (or maybe the night before) Tucker Carlson on Fox News came back from break, looked right at the camera and said something like, "With zero evidence of Russian collusion, Mueller's investigation should be winding down."

That's fake news. Nobody knows what Mueller may or may not have. All we know is what has been leaked, released, or assumed and that isn't much. Until Mueller releases his findings we won't know for sure what he has and what he doesn't. Arguing about it is worthless.

Except that there's zero evidence of Russian collusion, and Mueller's investigation is based on the fake dossier of bogus info paid for by Hillary and the dems. Not fake news.

[Steve Rupe]

Originally Posted by kane

Last night (or maybe the night before) Tucker Carlson on Fox News came back from break, looked right at the camera and said something like, "With zero evidence of Russian collusion, Mueller's investigation should be winding down."

That's fake news. Nobody knows what Mueller may or may not have. All we know is what has been leaked, released, or assumed and that isn't much. Until Mueller releases his findings we won't know for sure what he has and what he doesn't. Arguing about it is worthless.

As you can deduce from my post I 100% concur.

[Steve Rupe]

Originally Posted by Acepimp

Except that there's zero evidence of Russian collusion, and Mueller's investigation is based on the fake dossier of bogus info paid for by Hillary and the dems. Not fake news.

You do not know what evidence or lack of there is nor do you know what the basis of Mueller's investigation is. I suspect that the dossier is part of the investigation but I do not know. No one will know shit until Mueller tells us at the end of his investigation. Especially not you.

[NewNick]

Originally Posted by Acepimp

There's also proof that Hillary paid for the dossier of false info to smear Trump, get a warrant to spy on him under false pretenses, and attempt to influence the election.

Actually dear, Republicans paid for the dossier.

So.......

[Steve Rupe]

Originally Posted by NewNick

Actually dear, Republicans paid for the dossier.

So.......

In addition it was Republicans that initiated the investigation as well as appointed the Special Prosecutor, Mueller.

[Acepimp]

Originally Posted by Steve Rupe

You do not know what evidence or lack of there is nor do you know what the basis of Mueller's investigation is. I suspect that the dossier is part of the investigation but I do not know. No one will know shit until Mueller tells us at the end of his investigation. Especially not you.

More leaks than any other administration in history, yet no evidence of anything has leaked to the media. Gimme a break.

Originally Posted by NewNick

Actually dear, Republicans paid for the dossier.

So.......

Hello BladeLiar's fake nic. What you stated was done by Jeb Bush before the primary. We're talking about the general election, where Hillary spent $12 million adding more fake info to the fake dossier. Keep lying by omission tho, so I can keep clowning you with the truth.

[Rochard]

Originally Posted by Steve Rupe

Trump haters say there is proof of collusion or proof of this or that.

What there is proof of is there is an ongoing investigation and until that investigation ends no one knows what proof there is or lack thereof about anything.

Until the Special Prosecutor ends his investigation all any one, including the media, can do is speculate.

Well, Carter Page was being investigated as a spy for the Russians before Trump ran for office. So there is that.

Then we have George Papadopoulos who was in London bragging about how the Russians had hacked the DNC and had "dirt" on Hillary.

I am guessing the FBI has a lot more too.

[Vendzilla]

Lol, the democrats are the ones that used the dossier to illegally get a fisa warrant to spy on the trump campaign. This is after Obama tried to get a warrant and was refused.

[Acepimp]

Originally Posted by Vendzilla

Lol, the democrats are the ones that used the dossier to illegally get a fisa warrant to spy on the trump campaign. This is after Obama tried to get a warrant and was refused.

Rochard and the rest of these loons are impervious to unbiased facts.

[onwebcam]

Originally Posted by NewNick

Actually dear, Republicans paid for the dossier.

So.......

Actually dear, we now know..

"WASHINGTON (AP) ? In a story Feb. 2 about a Republican memo on the Russia investigation, The Associated Press erroneously reported that a former British spy?s work on an opposition research project was initially funded by the conservative Washington Free Beacon. Though the former spy, Christopher Steele, was hired by a firm that was initially funded by the Washington Free Beacon, he did not begin work on the project until after Democratic groups had begun funding it.

A corrected version of the story is below:"

https://apnews.com/63c883156e314b68b86209d3b63890f5

[Paul Markham]

Clinton received 2.1% more votes then Trump. And Trump won. Because he campaigned to the lower 50% of America and they loved him. If the rules had been different he would have campaigned differently.

The decision the Democrats have to make is will they drop their policies that are making most Americans poorer?

[NewNick]

Originally Posted by Acepimp

There's also proof that Hillary paid for the dossier of false info to smear Trump, get a warrant to spy on him under false pretenses, and attempt to influence the election.

That really is quite silly.

You are such a nob.

[NewNick]

Originally Posted by Vendzilla

Lol, the democrats are the ones that used the dossier to illegally get a fisa warrant to spy on the trump campaign. This is after Obama tried to get a warrant and was refused.

Another halfwit making shit up.

The FBI applied for a FISA warrant based on ALL of the information they had to hand. Not just the dossier.

The same FBI that virtually installed Trumpo in The White House.

Idiot.

[bronco67]

Doesn't proof come AFTER an investigation? Trump supporters need to stop saying there's no proof of collusion. To the average observer there's a lot of things to be concerned about where Trump and Russia is concerned. I'm sure that when the Muller team went poking about all of the Trump data for the investigation, a bomb of red flags exploded and injured several of the investigators.

[Steve Rupe]

Originally Posted by Paul Markham

Clinton received 2.1% more votes then Trump. And Trump won. Because he campaigned to the lower 50% of America and they loved him. If the rules had been different he would have campaigned differently.

The decision the Democrats have to make is will they drop their policies that are making most Americans poorer?

Historically the opposite party takes control during midterm elections. There is not any reason to expect history not to repeat itself.

[Busty2]

Originally Posted by Steve Rupe

Trump haters say there is proof of collusion or proof of this or that.

What there is proof of is there is an ongoing investigation and until that investigation ends no one knows what proof there is or lack thereof about anything.

Until the Special Prosecutor ends his investigation all any one, including the media, can do is speculate.

True its all speculation so far

[beerptrol]

Chump supporters are a bunch of brainwashed cultist who believe only what the liar in chief tells them to believe in. Facts have to place in their world. They love their conman