List of Republican Neo Nazis and White Nationalist running for office..

[crockett]

https://www.haaretz.com/us-news/reco...medium=twitter


This is now the Republican party.. Thanks Robbie, Thanks Baddog and everyone of you who voted for Trump knowing he was promoting racism, bigotry and Nazism..

[$5 submissions]

But aren't leftists convinced that everyone who doesn't agree with them are either a) idiots b) rubes who need 'enlightenment' or c) evil nazis?

Trump is a special case because apparently the Left thinks he's all three

[crockett]

Originally Posted by $5 submissions

But aren't leftists convinced that everyone who doesn't agree with them are either a) idiots b) rubes who need 'enlightenment' or c) evil nazis?

Trump is a special case because apparently the Left thinks he's all three

No.. I have no issues if people just disagree with me. I do have issues with people who are mentally insane though.. Which is most of the Republican party at this point..

You can't find many examples of Republicans who are "sane" I can't think of any elected Republican who isn't bat shit crazy. If they happen to not be bat shit crazy, they still party line vote on the bat shit crazy bills which makes them worse than the bat shit crazy ones because they at least know better but do it anyway.

Show me a single elected Republican who has gone against Trump with more than just "oh that's bad he shouldn't say that".. Not a single Republican has stood up to take action when Trump said white supremacist were "good people" or when he called Mexicans rapist & criminals.. Not one stood up to do anything..

It's because they are all ok with it as long as they get the policies they want..

[MindWaste]

"White power" in Power.. Who would have thought...

[OneHungLo]

Originally Posted by crockett

No.. I have no issues if people just disagree with me. I do have issues with people who are mentally insane though.. Which is most of the Republican party at this point..

Haha no. Everyone that disagrees with you is a racist nazi (according to you.)

[onwebcam]

“[…] My view on identity politics is that it can be justified only if everyone of any ethnicity is entitled to participate, in which case it is necessary for all (because failing to assert it, as when White people of European ancestry fail to assert it lest they be branded as “racists”, means leaving oneself and one’s group defenseless against competition for resources and opportunity). Alternatively, lest any group be denied its identity while others assert their own, group identity must be equitably denied to everyone.

Human identity is stratified, and thus has both individual and group levels. Accordingly, we can (and sometimes must) reason in terms of group identity. But when group self-identification is officially granted to some groups yet denied to others against which they compete, this can only result in imbalance and injustice. For example, when some overpopulating groups which have overtaxed their own resources by reproductive incontinence and homegrown oligarchy are allowed to migrate into the sovereign territories of worldwide ethnic minorities - e.g., people of European descent - and enjoy special “oppressed” status whereby they reap special benefits such as free food, free housing, free education, free healthcare, affirmative action, reproductive subsidies, and special treatment under the law, and are even credited with moral superiority due to their alleged “oppression”, this can result in the destruction of the national, cultural, and ethnic identity of the hosts, leading ultimately to their extinction. Incoming groups which assert their own collective identities while denying their hosts any reciprocal right of political group cohesion thus amount to noxious, invasive, and ultimately lethal socioeconomic parasites. Obviously, any governmental authority which enforces or encourages such asymmetry - e.g., the European Union - is illegitimate.

Bear in mind that once we cease to treat individuals as individuals per se, thus allowing members of their respective groups to assert their ethnic, cultural, or religious (etc.) identities against their “oppressors”, their group properties and statistics are automatically opened to scrutiny and comparative analysis. For example, if after several generations of special treatment in the educational sphere (compulsory school integration, special programs, modifications of educational procedure, racially defined college admission preferences, etc.), a particular “oppressed” group fails as a whole to outgrow these measures, its members are no longer entitled to exemption from objective characterization in terms of associated group statistics; if one wants to enjoy the social benefits attending ethically loaded group-defined properties like “belonging to an oppressed group”, one must submit to rational policies formed on the basis of not just individual assessment, but empirically confirmed group-defined properties such as “belonging to a group exhibiting a relatively low mean IQ and a tendency to violently disrupt the educational environment”. Continuing to pursue racially parameterized measures of human worth and achievement can only lead to personal injustice, social degradation, and biological degeneration (because such measures inevitably supplant any rational form of social, economic, and reproductive selection).

In short, identity politics should either be shut down immediately, or the majority populations of Europe and North America should be encouraged to assert their own ethnic and cultural identities and group interests with full force. Any governmental, academic, religious, or media authority which tries to prevent it is clearly unworthy of respect and obedience.”

Christopher Langan

[ghjghj]

Originally Posted by onwebcam

“[…] My view on identity politics is that it can be justified only if everyone of any ethnicity is entitled to participate, in which case it is necessary for all (because failing to assert it, as when White people of European ancestry fail to assert it lest they be branded as “racists”, means leaving oneself and one’s group defenseless against competition for resources and opportunity). Alternatively, lest any group be denied its identity while others assert their own, group identity must be equitably denied to everyone.

Human identity is stratified, and thus has both individual and group levels. Accordingly, we can (and sometimes must) reason in terms of group identity. But when group self-identification is officially granted to some groups yet denied to others against which they compete, this can only result in imbalance and injustice. For example, when some overpopulating groups which have overtaxed their own resources by reproductive incontinence and homegrown oligarchy are allowed to migrate into the sovereign territories of worldwide ethnic minorities - e.g., people of European descent - and enjoy special “oppressed” status whereby they reap special benefits such as free food, free housing, free education, free healthcare, affirmative action, reproductive subsidies, and special treatment under the law, and are even credited with moral superiority due to their alleged “oppression”, this can result in the destruction of the national, cultural, and ethnic identity of the hosts, leading ultimately to their extinction. Incoming groups which assert their own collective identities while denying their hosts any reciprocal right of political group cohesion thus amount to noxious, invasive, and ultimately lethal socioeconomic parasites. Obviously, any governmental authority which enforces or encourages such asymmetry - e.g., the European Union - is illegitimate.

Bear in mind that once we cease to treat individuals as individuals per se, thus allowing members of their respective groups to assert their ethnic, cultural, or religious (etc.) identities against their “oppressors”, their group properties and statistics are automatically opened to scrutiny and comparative analysis. For example, if after several generations of special treatment in the educational sphere (compulsory school integration, special programs, modifications of educational procedure, racially defined college admission preferences, etc.), a particular “oppressed” group fails as a whole to outgrow these measures, its members are no longer entitled to exemption from objective characterization in terms of associated group statistics; if one wants to enjoy the social benefits attending ethically loaded group-defined properties like “belonging to an oppressed group”, one must submit to rational policies formed on the basis of not just individual assessment, but empirically confirmed group-defined properties such as “belonging to a group exhibiting a relatively low mean IQ and a tendency to violently disrupt the educational environment”. Continuing to pursue racially parameterized measures of human worth and achievement can only lead to personal injustice, social degradation, and biological degeneration (because such measures inevitably supplant any rational form of social, economic, and reproductive selection).

In short, identity politics should either be shut down immediately, or the majority populations of Europe and North America should be encouraged to assert their own ethnic and cultural identities and group interests with full force. Any governmental, academic, religious, or media authority which tries to prevent it is clearly unworthy of respect and obedience.”

Christopher Langan

[bronco67]

Not all conservatives are white supremacists. But all white supremacists are conservatives.

There are three underlying qualities which make someone a conservative:

1. Being an asshole

2. Being ignorant

3. Being racist.

There's a percentage of conservatives who are at least two of these things. And the other 99% are all three.

[Bladewire]

↑↑↑ Truth

[Bladewire]

Originally Posted by OneHungLo

Haha no. Everyone that disagrees with you is a racist nazi (according to you.)

Not true alt-wrong hate troll

Lots of us disagree and are happy to talk/work/love/live together. Your mental defect creates a disability that can only warrant one thing, the extermination of your kind via cutting off your government benefits foreigner. #ThanksTrump

[OneHungLo]

Originally Posted by Bladewire

Not true alt-wrong hate troll

Lots of us disagree and are happy to talk/work/love/live together. Your mental defect creates a disability that can only warrant one thing, the extermination of your kind via cutting off your government benefits foreigner. #ThanksTrump

Dude you can't even string a coherent sentence together

Put the meth pipe down.

[TheSquealer]

idiots on a far left, biased mission for page views (huffpo) search 1000s of potential candidates and found 9 douchebags.

seems like someone in the party of slavery, Jim Crowe and the KKK needs to learn basic math.

[mlmleads]

Originally Posted by bronco67

Not all conservatives are white supremacists. But all white supremacists are conservatives.

There are three underlying qualities which make someone a conservative:

1. Being an asshole

2. Being ignorant

3. Being racist.

There's a percentage of conservatives who are at least two of these things. And the other 99% are all three.

Yeah except the KKK was founded by southern democrats. So let's just be honest, "all" is always wrong. By the way your list of three makes you at least number two, if not number one and number two.