AOC tax robots 90% and no one has to work

[onwebcam]

The core of our problem is we aren't taxing robots enough

https://twitter.com/RealSaavedra/sta...15221217026049

[Bladewire]

Nobody said that you copy paste queen

[gorillaz_]

this woman is so ugly ...

[thommy]

Originally Posted by onwebcam

The core of our problem is we aren't taxing robots enough

https://twitter.com/RealSaavedra/sta...15221217026049

this is actually the one and only way to look into some kind of future where people will be replaced from robots.

the other alternative is that they OWN them and rent them.

it is kind of a social and accepted slavery - mankind just did not think about this part because humans are technically further than mentally.

somehow we're trying to force our way into a society we've technically overtaken for a long time.

[pimpmaster9000]

She is right...automation is taking away your customers jobs like nothing else...it is cutting the branch you are sitting on...

[Bladewire]

Originally Posted by thommy

this is actually the one and only way to look into some kind of future where people will be replaced from robots.

Yes but not 90%

He lied in his title when he said that AOC said to "tax robots 90% and no one has to work"

[imabro]

Originally Posted by Bladewire

Yes but not 90%

He lied in his title when he said that AOC said to "tax robots 90% and no one has to work"

Like you have any room to talk. You constantly lie.

[thommy]

Originally Posted by Bladewire

Yes but not 90%

He lied in his title when he said that AOC said to "tax robots 90% and no one has to work"

why not 90% ???

you have to imagine that a robot does not need money.
the "boss" of such a company should not make more on a robot as on a human.

a worker is actually not only a worker - he is mainly a consumer because without consumers you do not need producers and without producers you do not need workers
and the worker works to be able to be a consumer.

it have to go in this direction and there is still a reason that people open a company, produce something, market it in a smart way and make more at the end of the month as someone that does not go to work.

do you think the owner of a big company makes 10% from the paycheck of all his workers? I think he does not even make 3% - so this 90% tax would not really hurt him because it is used to give HIS CUSTOMERS the money to buy the products.

what most of you see completely wrong is that money can be wasted. but in fact in can not be wasted. not even food stamps are wasted money for the society because they bring someone revenue - and this someone pays people from this revenue - and this people are also consuming from this money and make someone else revenue.

the money circle lives from balance - it can´t go only in one direction - it must be giving and taking otherwise the circle stops.
if we talk here about human you will always have a winner and a loser. but if we are talking about machines that are made to be losers the situation is a completely other.

[onwebcam]

Originally Posted by thommy

why not 90% ???

you have to imagine that a robot does not need money.
the "boss" of such a company should not make more on a robot as on a human.

a worker is actually not only a worker - he is mainly a consumer because without consumers you do not need producers and without producers you do not need workers
and the worker works to be able to be a consumer.

it have to go in this direction and there is still a reason that people open a company, produce something, market it in a smart way and make more at the end of the month as someone that does not go to work.

do you think the owner of a big company makes 10% from the paycheck of all his workers? I think he does not even make 3% - so this 90% tax would not really hurt him because it is used to give HIS CUSTOMERS the money to buy the products.

what most of you see completely wrong is that money can be wasted. but in fact in can not be wasted. not even food stamps are wasted money for the society because they bring someone revenue - and this someone pays people from this revenue - and this people are also consuming from this money and make someone else revenue.

the money circle lives from balance - it can´t go only in one direction - it must be giving and taking otherwise the circle stops.
if we talk here about human you will always have a winner and a loser. but if we are talking about machines that are made to be losers the situation is a completely other.

I buy whatever tools necessary to make my job easier and to eliminate the need for help in turn saving me money.. Does that mean I should be taxed at a higher rate? (even more than I already am being self-employed)

[Bladewire]

Originally Posted by thommy

why not 90% ???

you have to imagine that a robot does not need money.
the "boss" of such a company should not make more on a robot as on a human.

a worker is actually not only a worker - he is mainly a consumer because without consumers you do not need producers and without producers you do not need workers
and the worker works to be able to be a consumer.

it have to go in this direction and there is still a reason that people open a company, produce something, market it in a smart way and make more at the end of the month as someone that does not go to work.

do you think the owner of a big company makes 10% from the paycheck of all his workers? I think he does not even make 3% - so this 90% tax would not really hurt him because it is used to give HIS CUSTOMERS the money to buy the products.

what most of you see completely wrong is that money can be wasted. but in fact in can not be wasted. not even food stamps are wasted money for the society because they bring someone revenue - and this someone pays people from this revenue - and this people are also consuming from this money and make someone else revenue.

the money circle lives from balance - it can´t go only in one direction - it must be giving and taking otherwise the circle stops.
if we talk here about human you will always have a winner and a loser. but if we are talking about machines that are made to be losers the situation is a completely other.

He falsely claimed that AOC was for taxing robots so "no one has to work". That was my point, he's lying about her saying that.

Literally every thread Wehateporn has posted is an easily disproved lie. His threads are trash on GFY.

Blocked alt-right hate fake nic reply in 3.. 2.. 1...

[tfto]

Originally Posted by Bladewire

He falsely claimed that AOC was for taxing robots so "no one has to work". That was my point, he's lying about her saying that.

Literally every thread Wehateporn has posted is an easily disproved lie. His threads are trash on GFY

You pretty much summed up your posting history.

Bladelier will come in, edit his post and then say some bullshit about a fake nic in 3...2...1...

[Bladewire]

↑↑↑ I was right again!

[Bladewire]

Originally Posted by crucifissio

She is right...automation is taking away your customers jobs like nothing else...it is cutting the branch you are sitting on...

They've been saying this for a hundred years

Blocked alt-right hate fake nic reply in 3.. 2.. 1...

No impulse control is part of it's disability

[tfto]

Will you look at that. Bladelier did come in, edit his posts and went with his fake nic bullshit once again. The loser is as predictable as yesterdays weather.

Don't be surprised if his fake nic's come in and post below. It's part of Bladelier Media's Standard Operation Procedure.

[thommy]

Originally Posted by onwebcam

I buy whatever tools necessary to make my job easier and to eliminate the need for help in turn saving me money.. Does that mean I should be taxed at a higher rate? (even more than I already am being self-employed)

i did really not expect that you understand the point.

ALL what you can do today was once impossible because people like you did not understand the vision behind.

everything you have you got through the ideas of visionaries. since you are not a visionary you can only be grateful that it exists and has always existed. the world will never get anything from people like you. with nuts like you we would still live in caves.

[Bladewire]

↑↑↑ Truth

[onwebcam]

Originally Posted by thommy

i did really not expect that you understand the point.

ALL what you can do today was once impossible because people like you did not understand the vision behind.

everything you have you got through the ideas of visionaries. since you are not a visionary you can only be grateful that it exists and has always existed. the world will never get anything from people like you. with nuts like you we would still live in caves.

Thats up there with one of the dumbest fucking things Ive ever read.. And pretty fucking amazing that you think it makes you look smart.

You would be crying like a little bitch after an hour working for me.. Thats why I invest in tools to make MY life and biz easier.. To replace bitches that cant handle it like you

[Idigmygirls]

I have written an economics paper titled, "The Economics of Post-Productive Economies."

In that paper, I basically conclude that there are two outcomes of automation's impact on advanced economies:

1) "Robots" are not taxed, and the rich-poor divide becomes so extreme that the poor must revolt or die; or

2) Those who are displaced by automation receive a basic income, which ultimately morphs into a universal basic income - allowing for consumers to remain consumers...

[thommy]

Originally Posted by Idigmygirls

I have written an economics paper titled, "The Economics of Post-Productive Economies."

In that paper, I basically conclude that there are two outcomes of automation's impact on advanced economies:

1) "Robots" are not taxed, and the rich-poor divide becomes so extreme that the poor must revolt or die; or

2) Those who are displaced by automation receive a basic income, which ultimately morphs into a universal basic income - allowing for consumers to remain consumers...

absolutely correct but don´t try to explain that to the brain bonsais.
they think that businesses will survive from sales made by higher credit card limits and not by income.

[thommy]

Originally Posted by onwebcam

You would be crying like a little bitch after an hour working for me..

I think you would be the one that would cry after find out that you have to work a month without break to pay ONE HOUR of my work.

i don´t know what you are doing and why you think you are the representative of the smart and successful but all what I can read from you shows me perfectly that you are eating your own fingernails for dinner.

[Paul Markham]

Originally Posted by onwebcam

Thats up there with one of the dumbest fucking things Ive ever read.. And pretty fucking amazing that you think it makes you look smart.

You would be crying like a little bitch after an hour working for me.. Thats why I invest in tools to make MY life and biz easier.. To replace bitches that cant handle it like you

Wage earners are not only consumers, they are also tax payers. They pay the most in taxes. So as robots take the jobs of consumers, who will pay the taxes that fund governments to pay for the thing you rely on to make your job possible?

[Paul Markham]

Originally Posted by Idigmygirls

I have written an economics paper titled, "The Economics of Post-Productive Economies."

In that paper, I basically conclude that there are two outcomes of automation's impact on advanced economies:

1) "Robots" are not taxed, and the rich-poor divide becomes so extreme that the poor must revolt or die; or

2) Those who are displaced by automation receive a basic income, which ultimately morphs into a universal basic income - allowing for consumers to remain consumers...

Add tax payers who pay for things like healthcare, unemployment, social programs, police, prisons, defence, roads, internet, etc.

People like onwebcam have a very blinkered outlook to what makes the world go around.

But it's nice to see Thommy change his attitude towards his vision of a future dominated by robots.