Judge rules State Dept and DOJ cut a deal or "discover" Hillary's emails

[onwebcam]

“Faced with one of the gravest modern offenses to government transparency, his (Obama’s) State & Justices Department fell short”

"At best, State’s attempt to pass-off its deficient search as legally adequate during settlement negotiations was negligence born out of incompetence. At worst, career employees in the State & Justice Dept colluded to scuttle public scrutiny of Clinton, skirt FOIA and hoodwink the court”

“To preserve the Department’s integrity, and to reassure the American people their government remains committed to transparency and the rule of law, this suspicion cannot be allowed to fester”

https://ecf.dcd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin...?2014cv1242-54

[Bladewire]

Day 9 of Russian alt-right hate fake nic troll onwebScam aka Fatt 26z aka imabroke aka AssPimple epic complete meltdown since Trump's fall from grace. I'm loving every moment of his mental disintegration

[crockett]

They are gonna lock her up anyday now..

[onwebcam]

Originally Posted by crockett

They are gonna lock her up anyday now..

They are going to have to admit "At best, State’s attempt to pass-off its deficient search as legally adequate during settlement negotiations was negligence born out of incompetence. At worst, career employees in the State & Justice Dept colluded to scuttle public scrutiny of Clinton, skirt FOIA and hoodwink the court”

As in admit they colluded with/for Hillary

[Bladewire]

Originally Posted by crockett

They are gonna lock her up anyday now..

He's so mentally ill

His mind is like a skipping record stuck on "any day now" for 2 years straight!

He'll reply in 3.. 2.. 1...

No impulse control is part of his mental illness

[onwebcam]

Originally Posted by Bladewire

He's so mentally ill

His mind is like a skipping record stuck on "any day now" for 2 years straight!

A judge just told you everything I've been saying all along is in fact true...

The State Dept AND the DOJ "colluded" with Hillary to "hide" > delete her emails..


THEN they "colluded" with Hillary to bury what they did by creating this "Russia collusion" fiasco. Trump wasn't suppose to win... In turn ALL of it would have gotten buried.

The only question now is.. Will Judicial Watch agree to accept admitting this as the win or will they go for the jugular?

[onwebcam]

LOL I just read the final pages... JW has the right to discover Anthony Weiner's laptop

How will they bury this shit?????

[Acepimp]

[onwebcam]

Originally Posted by Acepimp

As much as I'd like to think so.. I think JW will allow it to be buried.. Without some pressure from the public..

[Rochard]

Originally Posted by onwebcam

“Faced with one of the gravest modern offenses to government transparency, his (Obama’s) State & Justices Department fell short”

"At best, State’s attempt to pass-off its deficient search as legally adequate during settlement negotiations was negligence born out of incompetence. At worst, career employees in the State & Justice Dept colluded to scuttle public scrutiny of Clinton, skirt FOIA and hoodwink the court”

“To preserve the Department’s integrity, and to reassure the American people their government remains committed to transparency and the rule of law, this suspicion cannot be allowed to fester”

https://ecf.dcd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin...?2014cv1242-54

Sure sure. Let's have another investigation.

I mean... Twenty-first time is a charm right?

[Rochard]

I am going to write this up and put it on my Patriot Newsletter blog....

Patriot Newsletter – Making America Great Again!

[onwebcam]

Originally Posted by Rochard

Sure sure. Let's have another investigation.

I mean... Twenty-first time is a charm right?

I take it you didn't read the decision? It was all a cover-up...... How can there be a legitimate investigation when the investigators were HIDING and/or allowing to be deleted what they were suppose to be investigating? This also pertains to Benghazi as well...

[onwebcam]

Hope we get to see the court transcript from this.. Apparently the judge is pissed that Cheryl Mills got immunity because "she committed perjury" in his court.

[Rochard]

Originally Posted by onwebcam

I take it you didn't read the decision? It was all a cover-up...... How can there be a legitimate investigation when the investigators were HIDING and/or allowing to be deleted what they were suppose to be investigating? This also pertains to Benghazi as well...

How can it be an illegitimate investigation when the people doing the investigation was the Republicans? The Democrats didn't investigate Hillary, the Republicans did.

She hasn't committed a crime. At all. She wasn't even accused of a crime. It just is not illegal for the Secretary of State to run their email through a private email server. In fact, it was common. You understand if this is considered a crime, we'll start arresting Republicans for it right? Members of Congress were doing this too.

[onwebcam]

Originally Posted by Rochard

How can it be an illegitimate investigation when the people doing the investigation was the Republicans? The Democrats didn't investigate Hillary, the Republicans did.

She hasn't committed a crime. At all. She wasn't even accused of a crime. It just is not illegal for the Secretary of State to run their email through a private email server. In fact, it was common. You understand if this is considered a crime, we'll start arresting Republicans for it right? Members of Congress were doing this too.

Fitton says he's taking it to discovery with a pissed off judge behind him so I guess we will be finding out what crimes were committed

Apparently Weiners laptop had 5 FOLDERS marked as "child sex crimes" that was material FROM Hillary's server.. (This is on FBI inventory list) That's what NYPD wanted to expose back before the election... What Giuliani was referring to way back then when he said they had explosive material from his laptop... That whole ordeal is what MADE the FBI finally go and retrieve the laptop after they had already known about it for a month.. Then they "lost" the laptop for about a month.. McCabe hid it/sat on it until after the election..

[2MuchMark]

Originally Posted by onwebcam

“Faced with one of the gravest modern offenses to government transparency, his (Obama’s) State & Justices Department fell short”

"At best, State’s attempt to pass-off its deficient search as legally adequate during settlement negotiations was negligence born out of incompetence. At worst, career employees in the State & Justice Dept colluded to scuttle public scrutiny of Clinton, skirt FOIA and hoodwink the court”

“To preserve the Department’s integrity, and to reassure the American people their government remains committed to transparency and the rule of law, this suspicion cannot be allowed to fester”

https://ecf.dcd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin...?2014cv1242-54

LOL! Lawsuit was made by "Judicial Watch", American conservative activist group.

From https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/judicial-watch/

"Founded in 1994 by Larry Klayman, Judicial Watch (JW) is an American conservative activist group that files Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuits to investigate alleged misconduct by government officials. They primarily target Democrats such as the Clinton’s, Obama and climate scientists as they label climate science, “fraud science.” Judicial Watch has made numerous false and unsubstantiated claims, with a “vast majority” of their lawsuits dismissed. They describe themselves as “a conservative, non-partisan educational foundation, promotes transparency, accountability and integrity in government, politics and the law.” The current President of JW is Tom Fitton."

So in other words, they are complete bullshit.

There's more:

"Judicial Watch reports news on their website with the use of strong emotional language that is usually pro-right or anti-left. Common topics covered are anti-immigration, in which they highlight crimes committed by illegal immigrants such as this: Busy Month for Illegal Immigrants Committing Heinous Crimes or dedicating an entire website to exposing former President Obama’s alleged IRS scandal. They have also promoted debunked conspiracy theories such as this. Further, the founder of JW, Larry Klayman recently promoted the conspiracy that the Clinton’s were killing people. In general the majority of content and story selection is anti-left.

A factual search reveals a horrible track record with fact checking. Below is a small sample of their failed fact checks by IFCN fact checkers

DHS Quietly Moving, Releasing ‘Vanloads’ of ‘Illegal Aliens’ Away from Border – FALSE
Has Nancy Pelosi spent $100,000 on food, booze and “partying” during her air travel? – FALSE
Judicial Watch says ISIS operating a camp in Mexico–near El Paso – FALSE
‘Islamic Refugee’ with Gas Pipeline Plans Arrested in New Mexico Border County – FALSE
Did the IRS ‘Fast Track’ Tax-Exempt Status for ‘After School Satan’ Clubs? – FALSE"

So then um, good "reporting" there, onwebcam.

[onwebcam]

Originally Posted by 2MuchMark

LOL! Lawsuit was made by "Judicial Watch", American conservative activist group.

From https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/judicial-watch/

"Founded in 1994 by Larry Klayman, Judicial Watch (JW) is an American conservative activist group that files Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuits to investigate alleged misconduct by government officials. They primarily target Democrats such as the Clinton’s, Obama and climate scientists as they label climate science, “fraud science.” Judicial Watch has made numerous false and unsubstantiated claims, with a “vast majority” of their lawsuits dismissed. They describe themselves as “a conservative, non-partisan educational foundation, promotes transparency, accountability and integrity in government, politics and the law.” The current President of JW is Tom Fitton."

So in other words, they are complete bullshit.

There's more:

"Judicial Watch reports news on their website with the use of strong emotional language that is usually pro-right or anti-left. Common topics covered are anti-immigration, in which they highlight crimes committed by illegal immigrants such as this: Busy Month for Illegal Immigrants Committing Heinous Crimes or dedicating an entire website to exposing former President Obama’s alleged IRS scandal. They have also promoted debunked conspiracy theories such as this. Further, the founder of JW, Larry Klayman recently promoted the conspiracy that the Clinton’s were killing people. In general the majority of content and story selection is anti-left.

A factual search reveals a horrible track record with fact checking. Below is a small sample of their failed fact checks by IFCN fact checkers

DHS Quietly Moving, Releasing ‘Vanloads’ of ‘Illegal Aliens’ Away from Border – FALSE
Has Nancy Pelosi spent $100,000 on food, booze and “partying” during her air travel? – FALSE
Judicial Watch says ISIS operating a camp in Mexico–near El Paso – FALSE
‘Islamic Refugee’ with Gas Pipeline Plans Arrested in New Mexico Border County – FALSE
Did the IRS ‘Fast Track’ Tax-Exempt Status for ‘After School Satan’ Clubs? – FALSE"

So then um, good "reporting" there, onwebcam.

Not even bothering with whatever all that shit is.. WTF is a mediabiasfactcheck? Sounds like something mediamatters would do..

[Rochard]

Originally Posted by onwebcam

Not even bothering with whatever all that shit is.. WTF is a mediabiasfactcheck? Sounds like something mediamatters would do..

What he is saying is this is a bullshit a lawsuit from a heavily biased Republican group.

[King Mark]

Lmao....

[Diomed]

Originally Posted by Rochard

Sure sure. Let's have another investigation.

I mean... Twenty-first time is a charm right?

Isn't you who is constantly stating that "you want an investigation" on anything trump related?

[onwebcam]

Originally Posted by Rochard

What he is saying is this is a bullshit a lawsuit from a heavily biased Republican group.

This is the court's opinion. Not Judicial Watch's.. The Court does agree with them though.. If you want to attack something you have to attack the judge...

[AdultKing]

This is what the world sees when they look at American Politics.




Incidentally it's the same as what the world sees when they look at Australian or UK politics.

[King Mark]

Shout out to trump tho... Gave incels jobs (alt right blogs & shit)

[onwebcam]

Originally Posted by Diomed

Isn't you who is constantly stating that "you want an investigation" on anything trump related?

He does it because he has the misguided belief that Hillary was unfairly targeted and that the "investigations" into her were real investigations rather than cover-ups. So he believes that Trump should be unfairly targeted as well. I'm sure you are aware of this but I'm explaining it for people who "don't understand"

[Acepimp]

Originally Posted by onwebcam

Not even bothering with whatever all that shit is.. WTF is a mediabiasfactcheck? Sounds like something mediamatters would do..

^^ Mark has fallen for fake website MediaBiasFactCheck! LOL!

That site looks like a 12 year old built it. It was actually built by a friend of Hillary's in New York City. He runs a college where she likes to give speeches. His site is exactly like MediaMatters, it's democrat propaganda.

[onwebcam]

Originally Posted by Acepimp

^^ Mark has fallen for fake website MediaBiasFactCheck! LOL!

That site looks like a 12 year old built it. It was actually built by a friend of Hillary's in New York City. He runs a college where she likes to give speeches. His site is exactly like MediaMatters, it's democrat propaganda.

I didn't even visit the site and drew my conclusion just on the domain lol I guess it's the domainer in me.

[Paul Markham]

Originally Posted by Bladewire

Day 9 of Russian alt-right hate fake nic troll onwebScam aka Fatt 26z aka imabroke aka AssPimple epic complete meltdown since Trump's fall from grace. I'm loving every moment of his mental disintegration

Are you implying the Democrats or Clinton's are snow white clean?

[crockett]

Originally Posted by AdultKing

This is what the world sees when they look at American Politics.




Incidentally it's the same as what the world sees when they look at Australian or UK politics.

Umm have you looked at the UK or France lately? How about Russia.. well Russia there is no politics they all get shot..

[crockett]

Originally Posted by onwebcam

They are going to have to admit "At best, State’s attempt to pass-off its deficient search as legally adequate during settlement negotiations was negligence born out of incompetence. At worst, career employees in the State & Justice Dept colluded to scuttle public scrutiny of Clinton, skirt FOIA and hoodwink the court”

As in admit they colluded with/for Hillary

When will you ever admit Trump is a criminal as is the entire Republican party as well as the GOP.

[thommy]

Originally Posted by Paul Markham

Are you implying the Democrats or Clinton's are snow white clean?

you mean when someone who is NOT the president is not snow white clean it is argument enough to keep a deep dirty president in the oval office ?

i really can´t follow this logic.

[King Mark]

It's called denial and deflection.

[onwebcam]

Originally Posted by crockett

When will you ever admit Trump is a criminal as is the entire Republican party as well as the GOP.

What's the crime? Did a judge say one of Trumps people lied to the court and received immunity? BTW why did Cheryl Mills need immunity if no one did anything wrong?